ΚΑΙ ΦΩΤΙΖΕΙ ΤΟ ΤΕΛΙΚΟ ΠΑΙΓΝΙΔΙ ΠΟΥ ΠΑΙΖΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΟ ΚΟΣΟΒΟ.
ΣΕ ΠΡΟΣΦΑΤΟ ΑΡΘΡΟ ΤΟΥ ΜΕ ΤΙΤΛΟ «ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙ ΤΟ ΚΟΣΟΒΟ ΤΟ ΤΕΛΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΗΣ» Ο ASH NARAIN ROY ΤΟΥ ΙΝΣΤΙΤΟΥΤΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΩΝ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΩΝ ΤΟΥ ΝΕΟΥ ΔΕΛΧΙ ΠΡΟΕΙΔΟΠΟΙΟΥΣΕ ΟΤΙ » Η ΑΝΕΞΑΡΤΗΣΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΣΟΒΟΥ ΕΧΕΙ ΝΑ ΚΑΝΕΙ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΔΙΑΛΥΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ-ΕΘΝΟΥΣ.»
ΤΟ ΚΟΣΟΒΟ ΕΧΕΙ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΗΣΕΙ ΝΕΑ ΔΕΔΟΜΕΝΑ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΑΤΡΟΠΗ ΤΟΥ ΔΙΕΘΝΟΥΣ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥ ΣΕ ΣΧΕΣΗ ΜΕ ΤΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΩΜΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΔΑΦΙΚΗΣ ΚΥΡΙΑΡΧΙΑΣ ΧΩΡΩΝ ΜΕ ΜΕΙΟΝΟΤΙΚΟΥΣ ΠΛΗΘΥΣΜΟΥΣ.
ΟΙ ΑΥΤΟΝΟΜΙΣΤΕΣ ΣΕ ΟΛΟ ΤΟΝ ΚΟΣΜΟ ΘΑ ΧΡΗΣΙΜΟΠΟΙΗΣΟΥΝ ΑΥΤΟ ΤΟ ΠΑΡΑΔΕΙΓΜΑ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΠΡΟΩΘΗΣΟΥΝ ΤΑ ΣΧΕΔΙΑ ΤΟΥΣ.
ΗΔΗ ΟΙ ΒΑΣΚΟΙ ΚΑΙ ΟΙ ΚΑΤΑΛΩΝΟΙ ΑΥΤΟΝΟΜΙΣΤΕΣ ΥΠΟΔΕΧΤΗΚΑΝ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΕΞΑΡΤΗΣΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΣΟΒΟΥ ΜΕ ΤΟ ΣΥΝΘΗΜΑ «ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΤΟ ΚΟΣΟΒΟ, ΑΥΡΙΟ Η ΚΑΤΑΛΩΝΙΑ».
ΟΙ ΑΥΤΟΝΟΜΙΣΤΕΣ ΑΛΒΑΝΟΙ ΤΩΝ ΣΚΟΠΙΩΝ ΕΝΤΕΙΝΟΥΝ ΤΙΣ ΑΥΤΟΝΟΜΙΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΠΑΙΤΗΣΕΙΣ, ΤΟΝ ΠΡΟΦΑΝΗ ΔΡΟΜΟ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΕΞΑΡΤΗΣΙΑ.
ΤΟ ΚΟΣΟΒΟ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙ ΕΝΑ ΠΕΙΡΑΜΑ ΕΞΟΙΚΙΩΣΗΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΝ ΕΠΑΝΑΠΡΟΣΔΙΟΡΙΣΜΟ ΤΩΝ ΣΥΝΟΡΩΝ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΑΣΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΜΕΣΗ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗ.
ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΝΕΑ ΒΑΛΚΑΝΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ, ΜΕΡΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟ-ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΚΟΥ ΓΕΩΣΤΡΑΤΗΓΙΚΟΥ ΣΧΕΔΙΟΥ, ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΔΑΜΑΣΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΡΩΣΙΑ.
Ο ΣΤΟΧΟΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΝΑ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΗΣΟΥΝ ΜΙΑ ΣΦΗΝΑ ΣΤΑ ΒΑΛΚΑΝΙΑ ΜΕ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΣΧΗΜΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΙΚΗΣ ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΩΣΗΣ.
Η ΠΡΩΗΝ ΓΙΟΥΓΚΟΣΛΑΒΙΑ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΟΥΣΕ ΕΝΑ ΑΓΚΑΘΙ ΣΤΟ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟ-ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΚΟ ΣΧΕΔΙΟ ΚΑΙ ΓΙ΄ΑΥΤΟ ΤΟ ΛΟΓΟ ΕΙΧΕ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΣΤΟΧΕΥΣΗ.
ΟΙ ΒΟΒΜΑΡΔΙΣΜΟΙ ΤΟΥ ΝΑΤΟ ΕΝΑΝΤΙΟΝ ΤΗΣ ΓΙΟΥΓΚΟΣΛΑΒΙΑΣ ΤΟ 1999 ΑΠΟΤΕΛΟΥΣΕ ΕΝΑ ΚΑΛΑ ΕΠΕΞΕΡΓΑΣΜΕΝΟ ΣΧΕΔΙΟ.
ΘΑ ΓΙΝΟΥΝ ΤΩΡΑ ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΕΙΕΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΜΕΓΑΛΗΣ ΑΛΒΑΝΙΑΣ Η ΟΠΟΙΑ ΘΑ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙΤΑΙ-ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙΤΑΙ ΗΔΗ-ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΑΛΒΑΝΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΚΟΣΟΒΟ ΚΑΘΩΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΠΑΡΑΚΕΙΜΕΝΕΣ ΠΕΡΙΟΧΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΕΡΒΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥ ΜΑΥΡΟΒΟΥΝΙΟΥ, ΤΗΣ ΔΥΤΙΚΗΣ FYROM ΚΑΘΩΣ ΚΑΙ ΒΟΡΕΙΟΔΥΤΙΚΕΣ ΠΕΡΙΟΧΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ.»
ΤΟ ΠΟΣΟ ΔΙΚΙΟ ΕΧΕΙ Ο κ. ROY ΑΠΟΔΕΙΚΝΥΕΤΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΕΝΑ ΕΓΓΡΑΦΟ ΠΟΥ ΕΣΤΕΙΛΕ ΤΟ ΜΕΛΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΜΠΟΥΝΤΕΣΤΑΝΓΚ WILLY WIMMER ΣΤΟΝ ΜΕΤΕΠΕΙΤΑ ΚΑΓΚΕΛΛΑΡΙΟ ΣΡΑΙΝΤΕΡ ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΟΠΟΙΟ ΦΩΤΙΖΕΙ ΤΟ ΠΑΙΓΝΙΔΙ ΤΗΣ ΔΥΣΗΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΗ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΕΙΚΟΝΙΖΕΙ ΤΟΝ ΣΧΕΔΙΑΣΜΟ ΤΩΝ ΗΠΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΟΣΤΑΘΕΡΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΒΑΛΚΑΝΙΩΝ ΜΕ ΣΤΟΧΟ ΟΧΙ ΜΟΝΟΝ ΤΗΝ ΡΩΣΙΑ ΑΛΛΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΑΤΡΟΠΗ ΕΞΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΔΙΕΘΝΟΥΣ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥ ΜΕ ΟΤΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΣΥΝΕΠΑΓΕΤΑΙ.
«»»»»»
[A] strikingly frank letter to then German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, of May 2, 2000, in the form of a report from a State Department/American Enterprise Institute-sponsored conference in Bratislava, Slovakia succinctly lays out the causes of NATO’s 78-day bombing of Yugoslavia in the spring of 1999, the purposes behind NATO’s further enlargement toward the borders of Russia, and, most importantly from the aspect of global security, the US aim of undermining the international legal order…
The conference itself was held at a very high level, with several prime ministers, foreign ministers and defense ministers from Central European countries in attendance, along with high-level State Department, OSCE and NATO officials, and representatives of high profile international NGO’s and think tanks…including Richard Perle and Daniel Fried, current U.S. Assistant Secretary of State.
…Looking back at the events that have taken place since, and especially having in mind the…lightning-quick recognition of the new “state” [of Kosovo] on the part of the US and its closest, mostly Western allies, Willy Wimmer’s letter is not just a prophecy, but a roadmap…If there were any doubts as to the aggressive nature of the US-led policy regarding Kosovo (and Europe as a whole), the following letter will almost certainly dispel them. The same applies to all doubts as to whether [this]…represents not just a grievous but a deliberate violation of international law and the wrecking of the post-World War II European and global order.
Mr. Gerhard Schröder
Federal Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany
Berlin, May 2, 2000Highly esteemed Mr. Chancellor,
At the end of last week I had the opportunity to attend a conference in the Slovakian capital of Bratislava, jointly organized by the American State Department and the American Enterprise Institute (the foreign policy institute of the Republican Party). The main topics of the gathering were the Balkans and NATO enlargement.
The conference was attended by very high level political officials, as witnessed by the presence of a large number of prime ministers, as well as foreign ministers and defense ministers from the region. Among the numerous important points of discussion, certain themes deserve special mention:
1. The conference organizers demanded the speediest possible international recognition of an independent state of Kosovo within the circle of the allied states.
2. The organizers declared that the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia lies outside of any legal framework, before all outside the Helsinki Final Act [on the inviolability of state borders – trans. note].
…
6. Without denigrating the importance of the Europeans’ after-the-fact legalistic interpretation, namely that the expansion of NATO’s tasks beyond the treaty’s legal domain in the war against Yugoslavia was just an exception, it is nevertheless clear that this represented a precedent, to be invoked by anyone at any time, and that many others will follow the example in the future.7. It would be good, during NATO’s current enlargement, to restore the territorial situation in the area between the Baltic Sea and Anatolia [middle of Turkey] such as existed during the Roman Empire, at the time of its greatest power and greatest territorial expansion.
8. For this reason, Poland must be flanked to the north and to the south with democratic neighbor states, while Romania and Bulgaria are to secure a land connection with Turkey. Serbia (probably for the purposes of securing an unhindered US military presence) must be permanently excluded from European development.
9. North of Poland, total control over St. Petersburg’s access to the Baltic Sea must be established.
10. In all processes, peoples’ rights to self-determination should be favored over all other provisions or rules of international law.
11. The claim that, during its attack on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, NATO violated all international rules, and especially all the relevant provisions of international law – was not disputed.
After this conference, at which discussion was quite candid and open, it will not be possible to avoid the importance and long-term ramifications of its conclusions, especially having in mind the competence of the participants and organizers.
It seems that the American side, for the sake of its own goals, is willing and ready to undermine, on a global scale, the international legal order, which came about as a result of the two world wars in the previous century. Force is to stand above law. Wherever international law stands in the way, it is to be removed.
When the League of Nations experienced a similar fate, World War II was not far off. The manner of thought that takes into regard solely its own interests can only be referred to as totalitarian.
With friendly regards,
Willy Wimmer, Member, German Bundestag and Vice President, Parliamentary Assembly of the OSCE«»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
ΔΙΑΒΑΣΤΕ ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΟ ΤΟ ΑΡΘΡΟ ΕΔΩ