ΝΕΑ ΧΩΡΙΣ ΦΙΛΤΡΟ ΦΕΛΛΟΥ

Νέα και Παράξενα-Σελίδες εναλλακτικής πληροφόρησης και ειδήσεων-alternative informations

Archive for the ‘CIA’ Category

ΣΕΝΑΡΙΑ ΠΟΛΕΜΟΥ ΕΛΛΑΔΟΣ-ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑΣ-WAR GAMES GREECE VS TURKEY

Posted by satyrikon στο Ιουλίου 17, 2010

Η ΕΞΟΔΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΙΡΙ-ΡΕΙΣ

ΣΤΟ ΑΡΧΙΠΕΛΑΓΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΑΙΓΑΙΟΥ

ΓΙΑ ΥΠΟΘΑΛΑΣΣΙΕΣ «ΕΡΕΥΝΕΣ»

ΑΝΑΖΩΠΥΡΩΣΕ ΤΑ ΣΕΝΑΡΙΑ ΠΟΛΕΜΟΥ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑΣ

ΚΑΙ ΤΑΥΤΟΧΡΟΝΑ

ΥΠΕΝΘΥΜΙΣΕ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΛΑΟ ΤΗΝ ΠΕΡΙΦΗΜΗ ΡΗΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΑΝΔΡΕΑ ΠΑΠΑΝΔΡΕΟΥ

«ΒΥΘΙΣΑΤΕ ΤΟ ΧΟΡΑ«.

ΔΙΑΒΑΣΤΕ ΕΔΩ ΚΑΙ ΕΔΩ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΔΡΟΜΗ.

Διαβάστε τη συνέχεια του άρθρου »

Posted in Bilderberg, CIA, CYPRUS, FYROM, Ε.Ε., ΗΠΑ, Ισραήλ, ΙΣΛΑΜ, Μπιλντερμπέργκ, ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ, ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΙ, ΡΩΣΙΑ, ΤΡΑΠΕΖΙΚΟ ΚΑΡΤΕΛ, ΤΡΑΠΕΖΙΤΗΣ, Τουρκία, ΧΡΕΗ, NWO, one world government, Rothschilds, Turkey, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Σχόλια »

ΤΙ ΠΡΟΤΙΜΑΤΕ; ΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΤΙΚΟ ΠΡΑΞΙΚΟΠΗΜΑ Η’ ΛΑΙΚΗ ΕΠΑΝΑΣΤΑΣΗ;

Posted by satyrikon στο Ιουνίου 17, 2010

Η ΕΙΔΗΣΗ

Ζοσέ Μανουέλ Μπαρόζο

«Το φόβο ότι η δημοκρατία στις ευρωπαϊκές χώρες του νότου που αντιμετωπίζουν προβλήματα με το δημοσιονομικό τους έλλειμμα,ανάμεσα στις οποίες και η Ελλάδα, θα μπορούσε να καταρρεύσει φέρεται να εξέφρασε ο πρόεδρος της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής, Ζοσέ Μανουέλ Μπαρόζο. Την ακραία αυτή δήλωση, φέρεται να έκανε ο πρόεδρος της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής μιλώντας την προηγούμενη εβδομάδα σε εκπροσώπους ευρωπαϊκών συνδικάτων.

Η δημοκρατία στην Ελλάδα, την Πορτογαλία και την Ισπανία θα μπορούσε να «καταρρεύσει» αν δεν εφαρμοστούν άμεσα μέτρα περιορισμού του ελλείμματός τους, εκτίμησε ο πρόεδρος της Κομισιόν, μιλώντας σε εκπροσώπους ευρωπαϊκών συνδικάτων την περασμένη εβδομάδα, σύμφωνα με όσα μετέφερε στον Τύπο ο επικεφαλής της Ευρωπαϊκής Συνομοσπονδίας Συνδικαλιστικών Οργανώσεων, Τζον Μονκς.» Διαβάστε τη συνέχεια του άρθρου »

Posted in Bilderberg, Brzezinski, CFR, CIA, Ε.Ε., ΗΠΑ, ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ, Μπιλντερμπέργκ, ΝΕΑ ΕΠΟΧΗ, ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΟ ΝΟΜΙΣΜΑ, ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ, ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΙ, Σόρος, ΤΡΑΠΕΖΙΚΟ ΚΑΡΤΕΛ, ΤΡΑΠΕΖΙΤΗΣ, ΥΓΕΙΑ, NEW AGE, NWO, Rothschilds, Soros George, Uncategorized, UNITED FUTURE WORLD CURRENCY | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

ΟΙ ΟΥΙΓΟΥΡΟΙ ΚΑΛΟΥΝ ΣΕ ΑΝΤΙΡΑΤΣΙΣΤΙΚΟ ΣΥΛΛΑΛΗΤΗΡΙΟ ΣΤΗΝ ΟΜΟΝΟΙΑ…

Posted by satyrikon στο Ιουλίου 8, 2009

ΤΗΝ ΠΕΜΠΤΗ 9 ΙΟΥΛΙΟΥ 2009.

antiratsistiko-poster-9-71ΕΚΤΟΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΙΣ ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΣ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΗΤΕΣ?

-ΜΕΧΡΙ ΚΑΙ Η ΜΑΡΟΚΙΝΗ-

ΣΥΜΜΕΤΕΧΕΙ ΚΑΙ Η ΟΛΜΕ-

ΟΙ ΛΕΓΟΜΕΝΟΙ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΟΙ? ΤΗΣ ΜΕΣΗΣ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗΣ

-ΟΠΟΥ ΓΑΜΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΧΑΡΑ Η ΒΑΓΓΕΛΙΩ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΡΩΤΗ-.

ΟΠΩΣ ΘΑ ΕΧΕΤΕ ΗΔΗ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΗΘΕΙ ΟΙ ΟΥΙΓΟΥΡΟΙ

ΜΟΥΣΟΥΛΜΑΝΟΙ ΤΟ ΘΡΗΣΚΕΥΜΑ

ΤΟΥΡΚΙΚΟ ΦΥΛΟ ΠΕΡΙΠΟΥ 8 ΕΚ. ΠΟΥ ΚΑΤΟΙΚΕΙ ΕΝΤΟΣ ΤΩΝ ΟΡΙΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΚΙΝΑΣ,ΣΤΗΝ ΛΕΓΟΜΕΝΗ ΑΥΤΟΝΟΜΗ ΠΕΡΙΟΧΗ ΣΤΗΝ ΤΟΠΟΘΕΣΙΑ ΣΙΝΓΚΙΑΓΚ

ΒΡΙΣΚΟΝΤΑΙ ΣΕ ΕΞΕΓΕΡΣΗ.

Η ΤΟΠΟΘΕΣΙΑ ΣΙΝΓΚΙΑΓΚ-ΤΟΠΟΣ ΚΑΤΑΓΩΓΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΩΝ ΔΙΠΛΑΝΩΝ ΜΑΣ ΤΟΥΡΚΩΝ,ΟΙ ΟΠΟΙΟΙ ΑΝΗΣΥΧΟΥΝ ΠΟΛΥ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΥΙΓΟΥΡΟΥΣ- ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΟΛΥ ΠΛΟΥΣΙΑ ΣΕ ΟΡΥΚΤΑ.

ΤΟ ΣΗΜΑΝΤΙΚΟ ΟΜΩΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΟΤΙ ΑΠΟ ΚΕΙ ΘΕΛΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΡΩΣΟΙ ΚΑΙ ΟΙ ΚΙΝΕΖΟΙ ΝΑ ΠΕΡΑΣΕΙ ΑΓΩΓΟΣ ΠΟΥ ΘΑ ΠΡΟΜΗΘΕΥΕΙ ΜΕ ΑΕΡΙΟ ΤΗΝ ΚΙΝΑ.

ΟΙ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟΙ ΟΜΩΣ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΑΛΛΑ ΣΧΕΔΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΘΕΛΟΥΝ ΑΛΛΟΝ ΑΓΩΓΟ ΚΑΙ ΑΛΛΗ ΔΙΑΔΡΟΜΗ.

ΕΙΔΙΚΕΥΜΕΝΟΙ ΣΤΙΣ ΡΟΖ ΕΠΑΝΑΣΤΑΣΕΙΣ ΔΕΝ ΧΑΝΟΥΝ ΑΣΚΟΠΑ ΤΟΝ ΚΑΙΡΟ ΤΟΥΣ.

ΒΑΛΑΝΕ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΥΙΓΟΥΡΟΥΣ ΜΠΡΟΣΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΜΕΓΑΛΟ ΠΑΙΓΝΙΔΙ ΣΥΝΕΧΙΖΕΤΑΙ…

ΟΥΙΓΟΥΡΟΙ ΕΝΑΝΤΙΟΝ ΧΑΝ ΚΑΙ ΧΑΝ ΕΝΑΝΤΙΟΝ ΟΥΙΓΟΥΡΩΝ

ΔΙΑΙΡΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΥΕ!!

ΑΝΑΛΟΓΙΚΑ ΛΟΙΠΟΝ ΦΑΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΟΤΙ ΒΗΜΑ ΒΗΜΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ -ΠΟΥ ΕΧΕΙ ΕΝΔΙΑΦΕΡΟΝ ΥΠΕΔΑΦΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΕΔΑΦΟΣ-

ΣΧΕΔΙΑΖΟΥΝ ΚΑΤΙ ΠΑΡΟΜΟΙΟ.

ΛΑΘΡΟΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΙΣΘΟΦΟΡΟΙ «ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ»

ΕΝΑΝΤΙΟΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΩΝ

ΚΑΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ

ΕΝΑΝΤΙΟΝ ΛΑΘΡΟΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΩΝ ΚΑΙ «ΕΛΛΗΝΩΝ» ΜΙΣΘΟΦΟΡΩΝ.

update 13/07/09

Washington is Playing a Deeper Game with China

Posted in Brzezinski, CIA, ΗΠΑ, ΚΙΝΑ, ΛΑΘΡΟΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΕΣ, ΜΟΥΣΟΥΛΜΑΝΟΙ, ΝΕΑ ΕΠΟΧΗ, ΡΩΣΙΑ, Ρατσισμός, Τουρκία, NEW AGE, Turkey, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

ΕΚΘΕΣΗ ΤΗΣ CIA:ΤΟ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ ΘΑ ΠΑΨΕΙ ΝΑ ΥΠΑΡΧΕΙ ΜΕΣΑ ΣΤΑ ΕΠΟΜΕΝΑ ΧΡΟΝΙΑ!!

Posted by satyrikon στο Μαρτίου 17, 2009

ΜΕΛΕΤΗ ΠΟΥ ΕΓΙΝΕ ΓΙΑ ΛΟΓΑΡΙΑΣΜΟ ΤΗΣ

cia-seal

ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΙΚΗΣ CIA

ΕΚΦΡΑΖΕΙ

ΑΜΦΙΒΟΛΙΕΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΠΙΒΙΩΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ ΤΟΥ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ

israel_map

ΜΕΣΑ ΣΤΑ ΕΠΟΜΕΝΑ 20 ΧΡΟΝΙΑ.

ΑΥΤΟ ΣΕ ΣΥΝΔΥΑΣΜΟ ΜΕ ΔΗΛΩΣΕΙΣ ΤΟΥ ΙΣΡΑΗΛΙΝΟΥ ΠΡΩΘΥΠΟΥΡΓΟΥ

ehud-olmert3

ΕΧΟΥΝΤ ΟΛΜΕΡΤ

ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΤΕΛΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΙΔΕΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΜΕΓΑΛΟΥ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ

ΑΠΟΔΕΙΚΝΥΕΙ ΟΤΙ ΤΟ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ ΕΘΝΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ

ΔΕΝ ΦΑΙΝΕΤΑΙ Η ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΣΤΟ ΠΡΟΓΡΑΜΜΑ ΤΗΣ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΑΣ ΕΛΙΤ

ΝΑ ΣΥΝΕΧΙΣΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΥΠΑΡΞΗ ΤΟΥ.

ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΡΟΦΑΝΕΣ ΟΤΙ ΤΟ ΕΘΝΙΚΟ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ

ΔΕΝ ΕΧΕΙ ΘΕΣΗ ΜΕΣΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΠΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΗ

ΝΕΑ ΕΠΟΧΗ

ΤΗΣ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΟΠΟΙΗΣΗΣ.

ΕΠΕΙΔΗ ΣΤΟ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ ΔΕΝ ΜΠΟΡΟΥΝ ΝΑ ΣΤΕΙΛΟΥΝ ΛΑΘΡΟΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΕΣ

-ΟΠΩΣ ΑΥΤΟΥΣ ΠΟΥ ΦΟΡΤΩΝΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ-

ΓΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΕΙΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΙΑ ΕΝΙΑΙΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ ΙΣΡΑΗΛΙΝΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΜΟΥΣΟΥΛΜΑΝΩΝ ΟΠΟΤΕ ΤΗΝ ΛΥΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΔΙΑΛΥΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΕΒΡΑΙΩΝ ΘΑ ΤΗΝ ΔΩΣΕΙ Η ΔΗΜΟΓΡΑΦΙΚΗ ΑΥΞΗΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΜΟΥΣΟΥΛΜΑΝΙΚΟΥ ΠΛΗΘΥΣΜΟΥ.

ΚΑΤΙ ΑΝΑΛΟΓΟ ΜΕ ΑΥΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΚΑΝΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΤΟΥΡΚΟΙ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ.

ΜΑΣ ΣΤΕΛΝΟΥΝ ΜΟΥΣΟΥΛΜΑΝΟΥΣ ΟΙ ΟΠΟΙΟΙ ΠΑΡΑΜΕΝΟΝΤΑΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΜΕ ΒΑΣΗ ΤΑ ΔΗΜΟΓΡΑΦΙΚΑ ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΑ ΣΕ ΚΑΠΟΙΑ ΧΡΟΝΙΚΗ ΣΤΙΓΜΗ ΘΑ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΠΛΕΙΟΨΗΦΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΚΑΤΟΙΚΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ.

ΟΠΟΤΕ ΟΠΩΣ ΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΑΙΝΕΤΕ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΤΕΛΟΣ!!!

ΟΠΩΣ ΕΓΙΝΕ ΣΤΟ ΠΕΙΡΑΜΑ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΣΣΟΒΟΥ.

ΔΗΜΟΓΡΑΦΙΚΗ ΑΛΛΟΙΩΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΠΛΗΘΥΣΜΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΩΝ ΠΟΥ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΟΜΟΓΕΝΗ ΠΛΗΘΥΣΜΟ.

ΦΑΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΟΤΙ ΤΟ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ ΕΘΝΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΑΠΑΡΑΙΤΗΤΟ ΣΤΟΥΣ ΔΙΕΘΝΕΙΣ ΣΙΩΝΙΣΤΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΟΥΝ ΤΟΝ ΚΟΣΜΟ.

ΗΡΘΕ Η ΩΡΑ ΝΑ ΑΝΤΙΛΗΦΘΟΥΝ ΚΑΙ ΟΙ ΙΔΙΟΙ ΟΙ ΕΒΡΑΙΟΙ ΟΤΙ ΚΑΙ ΣΕ ΑΥΤΟΥΣ ΘΑ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΣΤΕΙ Η ΙΔΙΑ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΗ ΠΟΥ ΑΥΤΟΙ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΖΟΥΝ ΕΝΑΝΤΙΟΝ ΤΩΝ ΠΑΛΑΙΣΤΙΝΙΩΝ

Posted in CIA, Ισραήλ, ΝΕΑ ΕΠΟΧΗ, Τουρκία, Kosovo, NEW AGE, Turkey, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Σχόλια »

ΠΟΙΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η Standard & Poor’s ΠΟΥ ΥΠΟΒΑΘΜΙΖΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΙΣΤΟΛΗΠΤΙΚΗ ΙΚΑΝΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ?

Posted by satyrikon στο Ιανουαρίου 15, 2009

ΚΑΙ ΓΙΑΤΙ ΤΩΡΑ?

Η Standard & Poor’s ΥΠΟΒΑΘΜΙΣΕ ΤΗΝ ΠΙΣΤΟΛΗΠΤΙΚΗ ΙΚΑΝΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ ΤΗΝ ΠΕΡΑΣΜΕΝΗ ΕΒΔΟΜΑΔΑ ΜΑΖΙ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΙΡΛΑΝΔΙΑ. ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΥΠΟΒΑΘΜΙΣΕ ΑΡΝΗΤΙΚΑ ΟΜΩΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΟΡΤΟΓΑΛΙΑ ΠΡΟΚΑΛΩΝΤΑΣ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΤΙΔΡΑΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΠΟΡΤΟΓΑΛΟΥ ΠΡΩΘΥΠΟΥΡΓΟΥ Ο ΟΠΟΙΟΣ ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΙΣΕ «UNFAIR» ΤΗΝ ΚΙΝΗΣΗ ΑΥΤΗ ΤΗΣ Standard & Poor’s.

ΑΣ ΔΟΥΜΕ ΟΜΩΣ ΤΙ ΕΣΤΙ Η Standard & Poor’s ΚΑΙ ΤΙ ΣΥΜΦΕΡΟΝΤΑ ΕΞΥΠΗΡΕΤΕΙ ΕΝ ΜΕΣΩ ΤΗΣ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΑΣ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗΣ ΚΡΙΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΙΣΡΑΗΛΙΝΗΣ ΕΠΙΔΡΟΜΗΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΓΑΖΑ.

ΤΙ ΣΧΕΣΗ ΕΧΕΙ ΑΡΑΓΕ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΟΣΤΟΛΗ ΠΥΡΟΜΑΧΙΚΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΑΡΝΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΣ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΗΣ ΝΑ ΤΟ ΕΠΙΤΡΕΨΕΙ?

ΔΙΑΓΡΑΜΜΑ ΣΧΕΣΕΩΝ ΤΗΣ Standard & Poor’s

spoor1

SUBSIDIARY ΤΗΣ Standard & Poor’s H MacGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

spoor002

ΟΠΟΥ ΕΜΦΑΝΙΖΕΤΑΙ Ο JOHN NEGROPONTE ΩΣ EVP ΚΑΙ H CIA TO CFR KAI O BUSH KAΘΩΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΟ STATE DEPARTMENT.

spoor003

ΕΠΙΣΗΣ Η LOBBY FIRM PATTON BOGGS LLP ΟΠΟΥ ΚΑΙ Ο ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΑΡΧΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΠΕΖΟΝΑΥΤΩΝ  JOHN GARRETT -ΣΤΡΑΤΙΩΤΙΚΟΣ ΑΝΑΛΥΤΗΣ ΤΟΥ FOX NEWS-ΚΑΙ ΛΟΜΠΙΣΤΑΣ ΤΗΣ HESCO MILITARY PRODUCTS LTD.

spoor004

HESCO MILITARY PRODUCTS LTD

KΑΙ Η ΣΧΕΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΜΕ ΤΟ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΙΚΟ ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ ΑΜΥΝΑΣ

spoor005ΕΤΣΙ ΠΕΡΙΠΟΥ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΟ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟ -ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟ -ΣΤΡΑΤΙΩΤΙΚΟ ΣΥΜΠΛΕΓΜΑ ΠΟΥ ΕΛΕΓΧΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΙΣΤΟΛΗΠΤΙΚΗ ΥΠΟΒΑΘΜΙΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΘΕ ΧΩΡΑΣ.

ΕΠΙΣΗΣ

Άνθρωπος του Μητσοτάκη…

….διευθύνει τον Αστακό. Ο Βασίλης Κούτσης…

ΚΑΙ

Επί δύο χρόνια τώρα μεγάλα κοντέινερς‏…

Το γνώριζε για τον Αστακό η κ. Μπακογιάννη!

Posted in Bilderberg, CFR, CIA, Ισραήλ, Κ.Καραμανλής, NWO, Rothschilds, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

ΕΓΧΕΙΡΙΔΙΟ ΕΠΕΜΒΑΣΕΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟΣΤΑΘΕΡΟΠΟΙΗΣΕΩΝ(ARSOF) MADE IN USA

Posted by satyrikon στο Ιανουαρίου 12, 2009

FM 3-05.130

Army Special Operations Forces
Unconventional Warfare

September 2008

FM 3-05.130
Distribution Restriction: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies and their contractors only to
protect technical or operational information from automatic dissemination under the International Exchange
Program or by other means. This determination was made on 28 August 2008. Other requests for this document
must be referred to Commander, United States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School,
ATTN: AOJK-DTD-JA, Fort Bragg, NC 28310-9610, or by e-mail to JAComments@soc.mil.
Destruction Notice: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the
document.
Foreign Disclosure Restriction (FD 6): This publication has been reviewed by the product developers in
coordination with the United States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School foreign disclosure
authority. This product is releasable to students from foreign countries on a case-by-case basis only.

i

Field Manual

No. 3-05.130

Headquarters

Department of the Army

Washington, DC, 30 September 2008

Army Special Operations Forces

Unconventional Warfare

Contents

Page
PREFACE………………………………………………………………………………………………..iv
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………… 1-1
Overview………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1-1
Unconventional Warfare …………………………………………………………………………. 1-2
Conventional Warfare…………………………………………………………………………….. 1-4
Irregular Warfare …………………………………………………………………………………… 1-5
Chapter 2 UNITED STATES NATIONAL POWER……………………………………………………. 2-1
The International Environment ………………………………………………………………… 2-1
Instruments of United States National Power…………………………………………….. 2-1
The Effectiveness of Integrated National Power ………………………………………. 2-14
Chapter 3 POLICY AND DOCTRINE………………………………………………………………………. 3-1
National Policy………………………………………………………………………………………. 3-1
Conventional Warfare and Major Combat Operations ………………………………. 3-15
Irregular Warfare …………………………………………………………………………………. 3-21
Chapter 4 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS…………………………………………………………….. 4-1
Unconventional Warfare Planning……………………………………………………………. 4-1
Seven Phases of Unconventional Warfare………………………………………………… 4-5
Unconventional Warfare Termination of Operations …………………………………. 4-12
Army Special Operations Forces……………………………………………………………. 4-14
Supporting Elements and Activities………………………………………………………… 4-20
Interagency Activities……………………………………………………………………………. 4-20

Contents
ii FM 3-05.130 30 September 2008
Chapter 5 SPECIAL FORCES OPERATIONS…………………………………………………………. 5-1
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………… 5-1
Phase I: Preparation………………………………………………………………………………. 5-1
Phase II: Initial Contact…………………………………………………………………………… 5-2
Phase III: Infiltration……………………………………………………………………………….. 5-2
Phase IV: Organization…………………………………………………………………………… 5-3
Phase V: Buildup…………………………………………………………………………………… 5-6
Phase VI: Employment …………………………………………………………………………… 5-7
Phase VII: Transition ……………………………………………………………………………… 5-8
Chapter 6 PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS …………………………………………………………. 6-1
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………… 6-1
Phase I: Preparation………………………………………………………………………………. 6-1
Phase II: Initial Contact…………………………………………………………………………… 6-4
Phase III: Infiltration……………………………………………………………………………….. 6-5
Phase IV: Organization…………………………………………………………………………… 6-6
Phase V: Buildup…………………………………………………………………………………… 6-9
Phase VI: Employment …………………………………………………………………………. 6-11
Phase VII: Transition ……………………………………………………………………………. 6-12
Chapter 7 CIVIL AFFAIRS OPERATIONS………………………………………………………………. 7-1
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………… 7-1
Phase I: Preparation………………………………………………………………………………. 7-1
Phase II: Initial Contact…………………………………………………………………………… 7-3
Phase III: Infiltration……………………………………………………………………………….. 7-4
Phase IV: Organization…………………………………………………………………………… 7-5
Phase V: Buildup…………………………………………………………………………………… 7-6
Phase VI: Employment …………………………………………………………………………… 7-6
Phase VII: Transition ……………………………………………………………………………. 7-10
Chapter 8 SUPPORTING ELEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES …………………………………………. 8-1
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………… 8-1
Communications Support ……………………………………………………………………….. 8-1
Logistics Support …………………………………………………………………………………… 8-5
Force Health Protection………………………………………………………………………….. 8-8
Aviation Support ………………………………………………………………………………….. 8-11
Appendix A THE DIPLOMATIC INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL POWER……………………….A-1
Appendix B THE INFORMATIONAL INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL POWER………………..B-1
Appendix C THE INTELLIGENCE INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL POWER……………………C-1
Appendix D THE ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL POWER …………………………D-1
Appendix E THE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL POWER…………………………. E-1
Appendix F THE LAW ENFORCEMENT INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL POWER…………. F-1
Appendix G THE MILITARY INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL POWER ……………………………G-1
Appendix H THE ROLE OF HISTORY AND CULTURE ……………………………………………….H-1
Appendix I A HISTORICAL SURVEY OF UNCONVENTIONAL WARFARE …………………. I-1
Appendix J AN OUTLINE HISTORY OF THE UNCONVENTIONAL WARFARE
DEFINITION …………………………………………………………………………………………. J-1

Contents
30 September 2008 FM 3-05.130 iii
GLOSSARY ………………………………………………………………………………Glossary-1
REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………….References-1
INDEX……………………………………………………………………………………………. Index-1
Figures
Figure 1-1. Contrasting conventional and irregular warfare ……………………………………………1-7
Figure 1-2. Principles of major combat operations………………………………………………………..1-8
Figure 1-3. Joint operating concept relationships………………………………………………………….1-9
Figure 2-1. The intelligence process …………………………………………………………………………..2-5
Figure 4-1. Classic components of an insurgency in an unconventional warfare
operational area ……………………………………………………………………………………..4-8
Figure 6-1. Psychological Operations and Special Forces Soldiers building rapport
with an unconventional warfare force in Afghanistan …………………………………..6-6
Figure 6-2. Afghan village elder addressing population on Psychological Operations
loudspeaker……………………………………………………………………………………………6-8
Figure 7-1. Civil-military lines of operation in support of unconventional warfare………………7-2
Figure 7-2. Active Army Civil Affairs battalion operational structure ………………………………..7-3
Figure 7-3. Civil Affairs core tasks in support of civil-military operations ………………………….7-4
Figure 7-4. Sample checklist for transition planning…………………………………………………….7-11
Figure A-1. Organizations grouping almost all countries in their respective continents………A-7
Figure A-2. Several smaller regional organizations with nonoverlapping memberships……..A-8
Figure A-3. Several nonoverlapping large alliances………………………………………………………A-8
Figure B-1. The information environment …………………………………………………………………….B-2
Figure B-2. Information quality criteria ………………………………………………………………………..B-2
Tables
Table B-1. Information operations integration into joint operations………………………………. B-20

ΔΕΙΓΜΑΤΑ ΓΡΑΦΗΣ

1-21. Waging protracted IW depends on building global capability and capacity. IW will not be won by the United States alone but rather through combined efforts with multinational partners. Combined IW [Irregular Warfare, euphemism for TERRORISM] will require the joint force to establish a long-term sustained presence in numerous countries to build partner capability and capacity. This capability and capacity extends U.S. operational reach, multiplies forces available, and provides increased options for defeating adversaries. The constituent activities of IW are:

  • Insurgency.
  • COIN.
  • UW.
  • Terrorism
  • CT.
  • FID.
  • Stability, security, transition, and reconstruction (SSTR) operations.
  • Strategic communication (SC).
  • PSYOP.
  • Civil-military operations (CMO).
  • Information operations (IO).
  • Intelligence and counterintelligence (CI) activities.
  • Transnational criminal activities, including narco-trafficking, illicit arms dealing, and illegal financial transactions that support or sustain IW.
  • Law enforcement activities focused on countering irregular adversaries.

1-22. The above list of operations and activities can be conducted within IW;

@@@@@

Personnel should not confuse UW with other operations that involve indigenous
personnel, such as FID. The United States characterizes FID as an overt, direct
method of assistance to free and protect a host nation (HN) government from
insurgency or lawlessness. Forces conduct FID with recognized HN regular forces.
These forces are armed individuals or groups of individuals who are members of the
regular armed force, police force, or other internal security force of that nation. There
may be instances in which the United States or the HN overtly employs civilian
personnel to enhance operational effectiveness; however, those personnel are
openly recognized as an augmentation to the regular forces of the HN.
Army and joint doctrine currently do not define regulars, or regular forces. For use in
this manual, these forces are defined as being opposite of irregular forces. Regulars
are armed individuals or groups of individuals who are members of a regular armed
force, police, or other internal security force. Once a nation charters or sponsors a
force to provide internal security, that force is considered to be a regular force.
Regardless of its appearance or naming convention, if the force operates under
governmental control, it is a regular force.
Irregulars, or irregular forces, are individuals or groups of individuals who are not
members of a regular armed force, police, or other internal security force. They are
usually nonstate-sponsored and unconstrained by sovereign nation legalities and
boundaries. These forces may include, but are not limited to, specific paramilitary
forces, contractors, individuals, businesses, foreign political organizations, resistance
or insurgent organizations, expatriates, transnational terrorism adversaries,
disillusioned transnational terrorism members, black marketers, and other social or
political “undesirables.”

@@@@@

Chapter 1
1-8 FM 3-05.130 30 September 2008
be conducted as an IW element in support of what is predominantly a conventional military operation. The
emerging IW concept borrows heavily from traditional ARSOF concepts, but they are not synonymous.
Doctrinal Terms and Definitions
Conventional or traditional warfare: A form of warfare between states that employs
direct military confrontation to defeat an adversary’s armed forces, destroy an
adversary’s war-making capacity, or seize or retain territory in order to force a
change in an adversary’s government or policies. The focus of conventional military
operations is normally an adversary’s armed forces with the objective of influencing
the adversary’s government. It generally assumes that the indigenous populations
within the operational area are nonbelligerents and will accept whatever political
outcome the belligerent governments impose, arbitrate, or negotiate. A fundamental
military objective in conventional military operations is to minimize civilian
interference in those operations. (IW JOC, V1.0)
Irregular warfare: A violent struggle among state and nonstate actors for legitimacy
and influence over the relevant populations. (JP 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of
the United States)
Unconventional warfare: Operations conducted by, with, or through irregular forces in
support of a resistance movement, an insurgency, or conventional military
operations. (FM 3-05.201)
Foreign internal defense: Participation by civilian and military agencies of a
government in any of the action programs taken by another government or other
designated organization to free and protect its society from subversion, lawlessness,
and insurgency. (JP 1-02; FM 3-05.137, Army Special Operations Forces Foreign
Internal Defense)
Counterinsurgency: Those political, economic, military, paramilitary, psychological,
and civil actions taken by a government to defeat an insurgency. (JP 1-02; FM 3-24,

Counterinsurgency)

-Headquarters, Department of the Army, Army Special Operations Forces Unconventional Warfare, September 2008[PDF]

ΔΙΑΒΑΣΤΕ ΕΠΙΣΗΣ

ΓΙΑ ΤΙΣ ΕΠΕΜΒΑΣΕΙΣ ΤΗΣ CIA

ΑΝΑ ΤΟΝ ΚΟΣΜΟ

ΕΠΙΣΗΣ

Η CIA ΠΡΟΕΤΟΙΜΑΖΕΤΑΙ ΝΑ ΕΓΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΣΕΙ

ΣΤΡΑΤΙΩΤΙΚΗ ΔΙΚΤΑΤΟΡΙΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ?

Posted in CIA, NEWER WORLD ORDER, NWO, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Η ΡΩΣΙΚΗ ΑΠΑΝΤΗΣΗ ΣΤΑ ΣΧΕΔΙΑ ΤΩΝ OBAMA-BRZEZINSKI

Posted by satyrikon στο Ιανουαρίου 3, 2009

ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΦΕΒΡΟΥΑΡΙΟ ΤΟΥ 2008 ΓΡΑΦΑΜΕ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ

ΑΛΛΑΓΗ ΤΗΣ ΕΞΩΤΕΡΙΚΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΗΠΑ-Ο Zbigniew Brzezinski ΑΝΑΛΑΜΒΑΝΕΙ ΤΟΝ ΕΛΕΓΧΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΞΩΤΕΡΙΚΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΗΠΑ ΜΕ ΕΝΑ ΠΡΑΞΙΚΟΠΗΜΑ ΣΕ SLOW MOTION

ΤΑ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΤΑ ΤΑ ΟΠΟΙΑ ΑΚΟΛΟΥΘΗΣΑΝ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΑΔΡΑΜΑΤΙΖΟΝΤΑΙ ΣΤΙΣ ΜΕΡΕΣ ΜΑΣ ΜΕ ΚΟΡΥΦΩΣΗ? ΤΗΝ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΗΛΕΗ ΣΦΑΓΗ ΑΜΑΧΩΝ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ ΣΤΗΝ ΓΑΖΑ

2009_dees

ΕΠΙΒΕΒΑΙΩΝΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΣΧΕΔΙΩΝ ΤΟΥ ΔΙΔΥΜΟΥ OBAMA-BRZEZINSKI.

ΣΤΗΝ ΟΥΣΙΑ ΑΥΤΟΙ ΠΟΥ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΟΥΝ ΤΙΣ ΗΠΑ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΟΙ ΝΕΟΚΟΝΣ ΤΟΥ ΜΠΟΥΣ ΑΛΛΑ Η ΟΜΑΔΑ ΤΟΥ BRZEZINSKI.

ΤΑ ΣΧΕΔΙΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΣΑΦΕΣΤΑΤΑ.

ΣΤΟΧΕΥΟΥΝ ΣΤΗΝ ΑΠΟΜΟΝΩΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΡΩΣΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΚΙΝΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΠΑΡΑΛΛΗΛΑ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΛΕΓΧΟ ΤΩΝ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΚΩΝ ΠΗΓΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΑΓΩΓΩΝ ΣΤΗΝ ΜΕΣΗ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΚΕΝΤΡΙΚΗ ΑΣΙΑ.

ΑΥΤΟΙ ΠΟΥ ΕΔΩΣΑΝ ΠΙΣΤΗ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΚΛΟΓΗ OBAMA ΓΙΑ ΜΙΑ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗ ΜΕ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΟ ΠΡΟΣΩΠΟ ΔΙΑΨΕΥΔΟΝΤΑΙ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΟΙΚΤΡΑ.

Η ΠΕΡΙΟΔΟΣ OBAMA ΘΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΟΛΥ ΧΕΙΡΟΤΕΡΗ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΠΕΡΙΟΔΟ ΜΠΟΥΣ, ΤΟΣΟ ΓΙΑ ΤΙΣ ΙΔΙΕΣ ΤΙΣ ΗΠΑ ΟΣΟ ΚΑΙ ΓΙΑ ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΟ ΤΟΝ ΚΟΣΜΟ.

Η ΕΜΠΛΟΚΗ ΤΗΣ ΡΩΣΙΑΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΠΡΟΦΑΝΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΕΜΦΑΝΗΣ ΛΟΓΩ ΤΩΝ ΚΡΙΣΙΜΩΝ ΣΥΜΦΕΡΟΝΤΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΝ ΕΛΕΓΧΟ ΤΩΝ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΚΩΝ ΟΔΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΙΔΙΑΙΤΕΡΑ ΤΟΥ SOUTH STREAM ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥ NORD STREAM ΠΟΥ ΘΑ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΟΥΝ ΤΙΣ ,ΒΑΡΥΝΟΥΣΑΣ ΣΗΜΑΣΙΑΣ, ΕΝΑΛΛΑΚΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΡΟΜΕΣ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΗ, ΛΟΓΩ ΤΗΣ ΚΡΙΣΗΣ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΟΥΚΡΑΝΙΑ.

Η ΡΩΣΙΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΥΠΟΧΡΕΩΜΕΝΗ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΝΑ ΣΤΗΡΙΞΕΙ ΤΙΣ ΕΠΙΛΟΓΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΕΚ ΤΩΝ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΩΝ ΝΑ ΥΠΕΡΑΣΠΙΣΕΙ ΤΑ ΖΩΤΙΚΑ ΕΘΝΙΚΑ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΜΦΕΡΟΝΤΑ.

ΟΙ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΝ ΑΓΩΓΟ SOYTH STREAM ΑΠΟΤΕΛΟΥΝ ΜΕΡΟΣ ΤΩΝ ΣΤΡΑΤΗΓΙΚΩΝ ΣΥΜΦΕΡΟΝΤΩΝ ΤΙΣ ΡΩΣΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΕΧΕΙ ΣΑΝ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑ ΤΗΝ ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΕΙΑ ΑΠΟΣΤΑΘΕΡΟΠΟΙΗΣΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ ΜΑΣ-ΟΧΙ ΑΠΛΑ ΤΗΣ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΗΣ-ΑΠΟ ΤΙΣ ΗΠΑ ΩΣΤΕ ΝΑ ΑΠΟΦΕΥΧΘΕΙ Η ΑΠΩΛΕΙΑ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ ΤΗΣ ΠΕΡΙΟΧΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΒΑΛΚΑΝΙΩΝ ΟΠΟΥ ΤΟΣΑ ΑΥΤΕΣ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΕΠΕΝΔΥΣΕΙ (ΑΛΒΑΝΙΑ,ΣΚΟΠΙΑ,ΚΛΠ.).

Η ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙ ΤΟ ΣΤΑΥΡΟΔΡΟΜΙ ΤΗΣ ΠΕΡΙΟΧΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΙΣΧΥΡΟ ΣΤΡΑΤΗΓΙΚΟ ΣΗΜΕΙΟ ΣΤΟ ΠΑΙΓΝΙΔΙ ΤΩΝ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΚΩΝ ΟΔΩΝ.

ΤΑ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΤΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΒΟΜΒΑΗ, ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ,ΣΤΗΝ ΓΑΖΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΕ ΟΤΙ ΘΑ ΑΚΟΛΟΥΘΗΣΕΙ ΦΑΙΝΟΝΤΑΙ ΑΣΥΝΔΕΤΑ ΜΕΤΑΞΥ ΤΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟΠΡΟΣΑΝΑΤΟΛΙΖΟΥΝ ΤΟΝ ΠΑΡΑΤΗΡΗΤΗ ΑΛΛΑ ΘΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΣΗΜΕΙΩΣΟΥΜΕ ΟΤΙ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΟΥΝ ΜΕΡΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΣΕΝΑΡΙΟΥ ΠΟΥ ΠΑΙΖΕΤΑΙ ΑΥΤΗ ΤΗΝ ΩΡΑ.

ΕΠΙΣΗΣ Η ΕΜΠΛΟΚΗ ΤΗΣ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑΣ Η ΟΠΟΙΑ ΘΕΛΕΙ ΝΑ ΛΟΓΙΖΕΤΑΙ ΩΣ ΠΕΡΙΦΕΡΕΙΑΚΗ ΥΠΕΡΔΥΝΑΜΗ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙ ΚΡΙΣΙΜΟ ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΟ ΔΙΟΤΙ ΟΙ ΔΙΠΛΩΜΑΤΙΚΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΚΙΝΗΣΕΙΣ ΤΟΣΟ ΣΤΟΝ ΠΟΛΕΜΟ ΡΩΣΙΑΣ-ΓΕΩΡΓΙΑΣ ΟΣΟ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΙΣ ΔΙΑΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΕΥΣΕΙΣ ΣΥΡΙΑΣ-ΙΣΡΑΗΛ ΔΕΝ ΚΑΡΠΟΦΟΡΗΣΑΝ.

ΟΙ ΠΡΟΚΛΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΚΙΝΗΣΕΙΣ ΕΝΑΝΤΙΟΝ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ ΣΤΟ ΑΙΓΑΙΟ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΟΥΝ ΕΝΑ ΑΚΟΜΑ ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΟ ΤΟ ΟΠΟΙΟ ΣΥΝΘΕΤΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΝΕΥΡΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΗΣ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΚΗΣ ΔΙΟΙΚΗΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΑΒΕΒΑΙΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΗΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΜΕΛΛΟΝ, ΕΝΟΨΕΙ ΜΑΛΙΣΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΚΕΙΜΕΝΗΣ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΙΑΣ ΚΟΥΡΔΙΚΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ.

ΤΟ ΚΕΡΑΣΑΚΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΤΟΥΡΤΑ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΟΥΝ ΤΑ ΡΩΣΙΚΑ ΝΑΥΤΙΚΑ ΓΥΜΝΑΣΙΑ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΕΝΑΕΡΙΟ ΚΑΙ ΝΑΥΤΙΚΟ ΧΩΡΟ.

Η ΑΠΕΥΘΥΝΟΜΕΝΗ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΑΙΤΗΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΔΙΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΓΥΜΝΑΣΙΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΟΧΙ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΗΝ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑ ΑΠΟΔΕΙΚΝΥΕΙ ΟΤΙ Η ΡΩΣΙΑ ΘΕΩΡΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΕΡΙΟΧΗ ΑΥΤΗ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗΡΙΖΕΙ ΤΑ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ ΣΥΜΦΕΡΟΝΤΑ.

Η ΠΑΡΟΥΣΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΡΩΣΙΚΟΥ ΣΤΟΛΟΥ ΣΤΗΝ ΠΕΡΙΟΧΗ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙ ΑΝΑΣΤΑΛΤΙΚΟ ΠΑΡΑΓΟΝΤΑ ΣΤΑ ΣΧΕΔΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΔΙΔΥΜΟΥ OBAMA-BRZEZINSKI ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΟΜΟΝΩΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΡΩΣΙΑΣ.

ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΜΟΝΗ ΧΩΡΑ ΠΟΥ ΜΠΟΡΕΙ ΝΑ ΣΥΝΟΜΙΛΗΣΕΙ ΤΟΣΟ ΜΕ ΤΟ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ ΟΣΟ ΚΑΙ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΧΑΜΑΣ ΟΠΩΣ ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΣΥΡΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΙΡΑΝ ΠΡΑΓΜΑ ΠΟΥ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙ ΑΝΕΠΙΘΥΜΗΤΗ ΕΞΕΛΙΞΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΙΣ ΗΠΑ.

ΔΕΝ ΜΠΟΡΟΥΜΕ ΝΑ ΓΝΩΡΙΖΟΥΜΕ ΠΟΣΟ ΘΑ ΕΝΤΑΘΟΥΝ Η ΟΧΙ ΤΑ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΤΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΑΛΛΑ ΠΡΟΒΛΕΠΟΥΜΕ ΟΤΙ ΕΑΝ ΟΙ ΣΚΕΨΕΙΣ ΠΟΥ ΔΙΑΤΥΠΩΘΗΚΑΝ ΠΙΟ ΠΑΝΩ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΣΦΑΛΕΙΣ Η ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΕΙΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΟΣΤΑΘΕΡΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ ΜΑΣ ΘΑ ΕΝΤΑΘΕΙ ΩΣΤΕ ΝΑ ΑΠΟΤΡΑΠΕΙ Η ΜΕΤΑΒΑΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΣΦΑΙΡΑ ΕΠΙΡΡΟΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΡΩΣΙΑΣ.

Posted in Albania, Brzezinski, China, CIA, FYROM, Αλβανία, Ισραήλ, Μπάρακ Ομπάμα, Παλαιστίνη, Τουρκία, NWO, Obama, South Stream, Turkey, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Σχόλια »

«ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΗ ΣΑΡΚΟΖΙ» Mr Sarkozy and the CIA. Based on Thierry Meyssan’s «Operation Sarkozy»

Posted by satyrikon στο Αύγουστος 7, 2008

Mr Sarkozy and the CIA. Based on Thierry Meyssan’s «Operation Sarkozy»

By Robert Thompson

Jul 18, 2008, 10:19

Editor�s Note: The article discussed below is included at the end of the document, both in translation and in the original French. Translation into English by Robert Thompson, with additional edits from Siv O�Neall.

A most interesting study dated 14th July 2008 by Thierry Meyssan, entitled Operation Sarkozy, has been brought to my attention on how the CIA managed to place one of its agents, namely Mr Nicolas Sarkozy, as president of the French Republic.

To make his point, Mr Meyssan does not content himself with vague conjecture, but puts together checkable facts relating to the relationship between our President and the CIA (the well-known terrorist organisation financed by the tax-payers in the USA), and the USA establishment in general, with a view to ensuring that French policy should be dramatically re-aligned to serve the interests of the present USA administration (not, of course, the people of the USA).

The links between various arms of the USA establishment and Mr Sarkozy are much closer than I could ever have imagined, although I was aware of a fair number of the facts reported and examined by Mr Meyssan. I had not however thought, and this is indeed my own fault, how closely these links tie up with other links with groups on both sides of the Atlantic allied, or similar, to the Mafia and other conspiratorial bodies based in Italy and neighbouring states as well as being well entrenched in the USA.

Acceptance of the arguments put forward by Mr Meyssan serves to explain many of the otherwise seemingly inexplicable decisions made by Mr Sarkozy since he took over from Jacques Chirac in 2007, as well as giving very personal private reasons (previously totally unknown to me, but then I am not a fan of the gossip columns) for the obvious dislike, and perhaps even hatred, which Mr Chirac has for his successor.

This article should be read by everyone as the implications are extremely serious for the future of the world. I make this claim not because France is still a great power — it is not and most of us recognise this — but it shows a more subtle means of achieving a coup d’�tat than using military or other violent means. Mr Meyssan very carefully tracks the whole story of Mr Sarkozy’s rise within the ranks of the successive parties which have claimed to be «Gaulliste» (as following the broad lines of policy laid down by the General, later President, but many of us still think of him as the great leader during the Second World War from 1940 onwards). It is a tale of most cunning duplicity supported by hyper-intelligent backing from within the USA establishment.

If the conclusions reached by Mr Meyssan are correct, and I can see no reason to doubt his analysis of the facts, then Mr Sarkozy is even more dangerous than he has so far appeared to be, and the poor and the oppressed can expect to suffer almost anywhere in the world from his actions on behalf of his masters in the USA. The Arab world, above all others, can expect to be the victim of highly sophisticated concerted trickery as he does everything that he can to crush any moves which the people may try to make towards freedom from tyranny, wherever such moves might in any way limit the greedy ambitions of those who rule the USA.

Copyright 2008 by AxisofLogic.com

This material is available for republication as long as reprints include verbatim copy of the article its entirety, respecting its integrity. Reprints must cite the author and Axis of Logic as the original source including a «live link» to the article. Thank you!

This the article in question:

Thierry Meyssan 14/07/08

Translated for Axis of Logic from French to English by Robert Thompson

Operation Sarkozy: how the CIA planted one of its agents as President of the French Republic.

Nicolas Sarkozy should be judged on his actions and not on his personality.

But when his actions surprise even his own electors, it is legitimate to examine in detail his biography and to ask about the alliances which brought him to power. Thierry Meyssan decided to write the truth about the origins of the President of the French Republic. All the information contained in this article is verifiable, with the exception of two imputations, pointed out by the author who assumes sole responsibility for them.

The French people, weary of the over-long presidencies of Fran�ois Mitterrand and Jacques Chirac, elected Nicolas Sarkozy and counted on his energy to revitalise their country. They hoped for a break with the years of immobilism and superannuated ideologies. They have had a break with the principles which form the foundation of the French nation. They have been stupefied by this «hyper president», every day grabbing hold of another new file, drawing the right and the left to him, thus disposing of all the land-marks to the point of creating complete confusion.

Like children who have just done something very stupid, the French are too busy finding excuses to admit the extent of the damage and of their na�vety. This makes them refuse all the more to see who Nicolas Sarkozy is, which they ought to have realised long ago.

The man is clever. Like an illusionist, he has diverted their attention by offering them his private life as a spectacle and in posing in celebrity magazines, to the point of making them overlook his political history.

Let the sense of this article be fully understood: it is not to reproach Mr Sarkozy with his links of family, friends and professional contacts, but to reproach him with having hidden his links from the French people who believed that they were electing a free man.

To understand how a man in whom all agree they see an agent of the United States and Israel has been able to become the head of the Gaullist party, then the President of the French Republic, one must go back in time. Far back. We must follow a long digression during which we shall introduce the protagonists who are today taking their revenge.

Family secrets

At the end of the Second World War, the USA secret services counted on the Italo-US godfather Lucky Luciano to control the security of American ports and to prepare the allied landings in Sicily.

Luciano’s contacts with the US services passed above all through Frank Wisner Sr. then, when the ‘godfather’ was freed and went into exile in Italy, through his Corsican ‘ambassador’, �tienne L�andri.

In 1958, the United States, worried about a possible victory of the FLN in Algeria which would have opened North Africa to Soviet influence, decided to give rise to a military coup d’�tat in France. The operation was organised jointly by the Planning Direction of the CIA – in theory run by Frank Wisner Sr.- and by NATO. But Wisner had already sunk into dementia so that it was his successor, Allan Dulles, who supervised the action. From Algiers, the French Generals formed a Committee of Public Safety which exerted pressure on the civil government in Paris and forced it to give full powers to General De Gaulle without any need to use force.

However, Charles De Gaulle was not the pawn whom the Anglo-Saxons believed they could manipulate. To start with, he tried to find a way out of the colonial contradiction by giving wide autonomy to the overseas territories within a French Union. But it was already too late to save the French Empire since the colonised peoples did not believe in the promises from the metropolis and insisted on their independence. After having successfully led fierce campaigns of repression against the independentists, De Gaulle realised what had to be done. Showing rare political wisdom, he decided to give each colony its independence.

This U-turn was seen as a betrayal by most of those who brought him to power. The CIA and NATO then backed all sorts of plots to get rid of him, including a failed putsch and some forty attempts to assassinate him. However, some of his partisans approved of his political evolution. Around Charles Pasqua, they formed the SAC, a militia to protect him.

Pasqua is both a Corsican crook and a former member of the resistance. He married the daughter of a Canadian bootlegger who made a fortune during prohibition. He ran the Ricard company which, after having dealt in absinthe, a forbidden drink, made itself respectable by selling anisette. However, the company continued to serve as a cover for all sorts of deals in relation with the Italo-New Yorker Genovese family, that of Lucky Luciano. It was therefore not surprising that Pasqua called on �tienne L�andri (Luciano’s «ambassador») to recruit strong arm men and build up a Gaullist militia. A third man played an important role in the formation of the SAC, De Gaulle’s former body-guard, Achille Peretti -another Corsican.

Thus protected, De Gaulle drew up with panache a policy of national independence. While confirming that he belonged to the Atlantic camp, he questioned the Anglo-Saxon leadership. He objected to the entry of the United Kingdom into the European Common Market (1961 and 1967); he refused the deployment of UNO blue helmets in the Congo (1961); he encouraged Latin American states to break free of US imperialism (speech in Mexico, 1964); he expelled NATO from France and withdrew form the Integrated Command Structure of the Atlantic Alliance (1966); he denounced the Viet-Nam War (speech in Phnon Penh, 1966); he condemned Israeli expansionism during the Six Day War (1967); he supported the independence of Quebec (speech in Montreal 1967) ; etc…

At the same time, De Gaulle consolidated France’s power by giving it a military-industrial complex including a nuclear dissuasion force, and by guaranteeing its supply of energy. He usefully separated the troublesome Corsicans from his entourage by giving them overseas missions. Thus �tienne L�andri became the dealer for the Elf group (now Total), while Charles Pasqua became the confidant of the heads of state in French-speaking Africa.

Aware that he could now defy the Anglo-Saxons everywhere at the same time, De Gaulle allied himself with the Rothschild family. He chose as Prime Minister the Director of the Bank, Georges Pompidou. The two men formed an efficient tandem. The political audacity of the first never lost sight of the economic realism of the second.

When De Gaulle resigned, in 1969, Georges Pompidou briefly succeeded him as President before being carried off by cancer. The historical Gaullists did not accept his leadership and were worried by his excessively anglophile attitude. They cried treason when Pompidou, seconded by the Secretary General of the Elyse Eduard Balladur, allowed «perfidious Albion» into the European Common Market.

The making of Nicolas Sarkozy

Having thus described the background, let us come back to our principal personage, Nicolas Sarkozy. Born in 1955, he was the son of a Hungarian nobleman, Pal Sark�sy de Nagy-Bocsa, who fled to France after fleeing the Red Army, and Andr�e Mallah, a Jewish lady from Sallonica. After having had three children (Guillaume, Nicolas and Fran�ois), the couple divorced. Pal Sark�sy de Nagy-Bocsa remarried with an aristocrat, Christine de Ganay, by whom he had two children (Pierre-Olivier and Caroline). Nicolas was not brought up by his parents alone, but passed to and fro in this recomposed family.

His mother became the Secretary of Achille Peretti. After having co-founded the SAC, De Gaulle’s body-guard had pursued a brilliant political career. He was elected D�put� and Mayor of Neuilly-sur-Seine, the richest suburb of the capital, then President of the National Assembly.

Unhappily, in 1972, Achille Peretti was subject to serious accusations. In the United States, the magazine Time revealed the existence of a secret Corsican criminal organisation the ‘Union corse ‘ which was said to control a large share of the traffic in drugs between Europe and America, the famous «French connection» which Hollywood brought to the screen. Based on parliamentary hearings and its own investigations, Time quoted the name of a Mafia boss, Jean Venturi, arrested some years earlier in Canada, who was no other than the commercial representative of Charles Pasqua for the drinks company Ricard. The names of several families were mentioned who were said to run the «Union corse», including the Perettis. Achille denied this, but had to resign from the presidency of the National Assembly and even escaped from a «suicide».

In 1977, Pal Sark�zy separated from his second wife, Christine de Ganay, who then linked herself with the number two of the central administration of the Department of State in the United States. She married him and set up home with him in America. The world being small, as is well known, her husband was no other than Frank Wisner Jr., the son of the previous one. The functions of Junior at the CIA are not known, but it was clear that he had an important role there. Nicolas, who remained close to his step-mother, his half-brother and his half-sister, began to turn towards the United States where he «benefitted» from training programmes in the Department of State.

At the same time, Nicolas Sarkozy joined the Gaullist Party. He there met and had contacts with Charles Pasqua more speedily as he was not only a national leader, but also in charge of the local section in the Hauts-de-Seine.

In 1982, Nicolas Sarkozy, having completed his legal training and having been called to the Bar, married Achilles Pretty’s niece. His best man was Charles Pasqual. As an Avocet, Ma�tre Sarkozy looked after the interests of the Corsican friends of his mentors. He bought a property in Corsica, at Vice, and thought of making his name more Corsican by replacing the ‘y’ with an ‘I’: Sarkozy.

The following year, he was elected Mayor of Neuilly-sure-Seine in the place of his uncle-in-law, Achilles Pretty, stricken by a heart attack.

However, Nicolas did not take long to betray his wife and, from 1984 onward, he had a hidden liaison with Cecilia, the wife of the most famous French television personality at the time, Jacques Martin, whom he had met when celebrating their marriage as Mayor of Neuilly. This double life lasted for five years, before the lovers left their respective spouses to set up a new household.

Nicolas was a witness at the marriage, in 1992, of Jacques Chirac’s daughter, Claude, to an editorialist at Le Figaro. he could not stop himself from seducing Claude and to have a brief affair with her, while living officially with Cecilia. The betrayed husband committed suicide by taking drugs. The break between the Chirac’s and Nicolas Sarkozy was brutal and permanent.

In 1993, the left lost the parliamentary elections. President Fran�ois Mitterrand refused to resign and entered into a cohabitation with a Prime Minister from the right, Jacques Chirac. His ambition was to become President and thought of then forming a tandem with Eduard Balladur comparable with that of De Gaulle and Pompidou, and he refused to be Prime Minister again and left the place to his «friend for over thirty years», Eduard Balladur. Despite his dubious past, Charles Pasqual became Minister of the Interior. Even if he kept a firm grip Moroccan marijuana, he took advantage of his position to legalise his other activities by taking control of the casinos, gaming and racing in French-speaking Africa. He also established links in Saudi Arabia and in Israel an became an honorary officer in the Mossad. As for Nicolas Sarkozy, he was Minister of the Budget and government spokesman.

In Washington, Frank Wisner Jr. took over from Paul Wolfowitz as being responsible for political planning in the Defence Department. Nobody commented on the links which he had with the French government’s spokesman.

This was when the tension within the Gaullist Party came back as thirty years earlier between the historic Gaullists and the financial right, in the person of Balladur. The novelty was that Charles Pasqua and with him the young Nicolas Sarkozy betrayed Jacques Chirac to come closer to the Rothschild tendency. Everything went wrong. The conflict reached its peak in 1995 when �douard Balladur put himself forward against his ex-friend Jacques Chirac for the presidential election, and was beaten. Above all, following the instructions received from London and Washington, the Balladur government opened negotiations for adhesion to the European Union and to NATO of the States in Central and Eastern Europe, freed from Soviet control.

Everything went wrong in the Gaullist Party where the friends of yester-year were ready to kill one another. To finance his electoral campaign, �douard Balladur tried to get hold of the Gaullist Party’s black funds, hidden within the double accounting system of the oil company Elf. Hardly had the old �tienne L�andri died, when Judges looked into the company and its bosses were incarcerated. But Balladur, Pasqua and Sarkozy never managed to recuperate the booty.

Crossing the desert

Throughout his first term, Jacques Chirac kept Nicolas Sarkozy at a distance. The man became discreet during this long period of crossing the desert. Discreetly, he continued to make links in financial circles.

In 1996, Nicolas Sarkozy having finally managed to end an endless divorce procedure married C�cilia. As witnesses they had the two billionaires Martin Bouygues and Bernard Arnaud (the richest man in the country).

Last act

Well before the Iraq crisis, Frank Wisner Jr. and his colleagues at the CIA were planning the destruction of the Gaullist line and the rise in power of Nicolas Sarkozy. They acted in three stages: firstly the elimination of the leaders of the Gaullist Party and taking over this body, then the elimination of the principal rival on the right and the investiture by the Gaullist Party for the presidential election, and finally the elimination of any serious challenger from the left in order to be sure of carrying off the presidential election.

For years, the media were kept excited by posthumous revelations by a real property speculator. Before dying of a serious illness, he had registered for reasons never made clear a video confession. For even more obscure reasons, the «cassette» fell into the hands of a highly placed member of the Socialist Party, Dominique Strauss-Khan, who passed it on indirectly to the press.

Even if the confessions of the speculator did not lead to any judicial sanction, they opened a Pandora’s box. The principal victim of the successive affairs was to be the Prime Minister Alain Jupp�. To protect Chirac, he alone took on all the criminal offences. Putting Jupp� out of the way left the way clear for Nicolas Sarkozy to take over the running of the Gaullist Party.

Sarkozy then made use of his position to force Jacques Chirac to take him back into the government, despite their mutual hatred. He was definitively to be the Minister of the Interior. What a mistake! In this post, he controlled the Pr�fets and the interior intelligence network which he used to put his appointees into the major branches of the administration.

He also dealt with Corsican matters. The Pr�fet Claude �rignac had been assassinated. Although no-one had claimed it, the murder was immediately interpreted as a challenge made by the independentists to the Republic. After a long hunt, the police managed to arrest a fleeing suspect, Yvan Colonna, the son of a Socialist D�put�. Without regard for the presumption of innocence, Nicolas Sarkozy announced this arrest accusing the suspect of being the assassin. This news was too good two days before a referendum being organised by the Minister of the Interior in Corsica to modify the status of the Island. However that may be, the voters rejected the Sarkozy project which, according to some, favoured Mafia interests.

Although Yvan Colonna was later found guilty, he has always claimed his innocence and no material evidence has been found against him. Strangely, the man refused to talk, preferring to be found guilty than to reveal what he knows. We here reveal that the Pr�fet �rignac was not killed by nationalists, but shot by the hit-man, Igor Pecatte, immediately sent off to Angola where he has been taken on by the Elf group. The motive for the crime was closely linked to the previous functions of �rignac, in charge of the African networks of Charles Pasqua at the Ministry of Cooperation. As for Yvan Colonna, he has been a personal friend of Nicolas Sarkozy for many years and their children are in friendly contact with one another.

A new affair came to light: false listings were circulating which untruthfully accused certain personalities of hiding bank accounts in Luxembourg, with Clearstream. Among the personalities defamed: Nicolas Sarkozy. He took the case to court and let it seem that his right-wing rival for the presidential election, the Prime Minister, Dominique de Villepin, had organised this machination. He did not hide his intention to have him sent to prison. In reality, the false listings were put in circulation by members of the Franco-American Foundation, of which John Negroponte was the President and Frank Wisner Jr. the Director. What the Judges did not know and we reveal here was that the listings were made in London by a joint office of the CIA and the MI6, Hakluyt & Co, of which Frank Wisner Jr. is also Director. Villepin fights back against the accusations, but he is charged, forbidden to leave his home and, de facto, temporarily removed from political life. The way is open for on the right for Nicolas Sarkozy.

It remained necessary to neutralise opposition candidates. The membership dues to the Socialist Party have gone down to a symbolic level to attract new members. Suddenly thousands of young people applied for membership cards. Among them are at least ten thousand new members who are in reality members of the Trotskyite «Lambertist» Party (so called from the name of their founder Pierre Lambert). This small extreme left formation has a history of working for the CIA against the Stalinist communists during the Cold War (it was the equivalent of the SD/USA of Max Shatchman, which formed the neoconservatives in the USA). This was not the first time that the «Lambertists» had infiltrated the Socialist Party.

In particular they planted two famous CIA agents: Lionel Jospin (who became Prime Minister) and Jean-Christophe Cambad�lis, the principal adviser to Dominique Strauss-Kahn.

Primaries were organised in the Socialist Party to appoint its candidate for the presidential election. Two personalities were competing: Laurent Fabius and S�gol�ne Royal. Only the first represented a danger for Sarkozy. Dominique Strauss-Kahn became a candidate with the task of eliminating Fabius at the last moment. This he was able to do thanks to the votes of the infiltrated «Lambertist» militants who voted not for him but for Royal. The operation was possible because Strauss-Kahn, of Moroccan Jewish origin, had been on the US payroll for many years. The French were not aware that he lectured at Stanford, where he had been taken on by the Provost of the University, Condoleezza Rice. As soon as he took office, Nicolas Sarkozy and Condoleezza Rice thanked Strauss-Kahn by having him appointed to head the International Monetary Fund.

First days at the �lys�e Palace

On the evening of the second round of the presidential election, when the opinion polls announced his probable victory, Nicolas Sarkozy made a short speech to the nation from his campaign HQ. Then, contrary to custom, he did not go to celebrate with the militants of his party, but went to Fouquet’s. The famous restaurant on the Champs-�lys�es, which had once been the meeting place for the «Union Corse» now belongs to the casino operator Dominique Desseigne. It was placed at the disposition of the elected President to receive his friends and principal donors to his campaign. A hundred or so guests crowded in, the richest men in France were there with the casino bosses.

Then the elected President allowed himself a few days of earned rest. Taken there in a private Falcon-900 to Malta, he rested there on the Paloma, the 65 metre yacht of his friend Vincent Bollor�, a billionaire formed at the Banque Rothschild.

Finally, Nicolas Sarkozy was invested as President of the French Republic. The first decree which he signed was not to proclaim an amnesty, but to allow casinos to be operated by his friends Desseigne et Partouche and increase the number of gambling machines.

He formed his working team and his government. With no surprise, one finds there a very worrying casino owner (Minister of Youth and Sport) and lobbyist for the casinos of his friend Desseigne (who became spokesman for the «Gaullist» Party).

Nicolas Sarkozy relied above all on four men: Claude Gu�ant, Secretary General of the �lys�e Palace. He was the former right arm of Charles Pasqua. Fran�ois P�rol, Assistant Secretary General of the �lys�e. He was a managing partner of the Banque Rothschild. Jean-David L�vitte, diplomatic adviser. Son of the former Director of the Jewish Agency. French Ambassador to UNO, he was removed from his post by Chirac who considered him too close to George Bush. Alain Bauer, the man in the shadow. His name does not appear in any directory. He is in charge of the intelligence services. Grandson of the Grand Rabbi of Lyon, former Grand-Master of the Grand Orient of France (the principal Masonic obedience in France) and former number 2 of the USA National Security Agency in Europe.

Frank Wisner Jr., who had in the meantime been appointed special envoy by President Bush for the independence of Kosovo, insisted that Bernard Kouchner be appointed Minister for Foreign Affairs with a dual priority mission: The independence of Kosovo and the ending of France’s Arab policy.

Kouchner, of Baltic Jewish origin, started his career by taking part in creating a humanitarian NGO. Thanks to money from the National Endowment for Democracy, he took part in operations for Zbigniew Brzezinski in Afghanistan, alongside Osama Ben Laden and the Karza� brothers against the Soviets. He could be found in the 90s alongside Alija Izetbegovi� in Bosnia-Herzegovina. From 1999 to 2001, he was the High Representative of UNO in Kosovo.

Under the control of the younger brother of President Hamid Karza�, Afghanistan became the largest producer in the world of opium poppies. The juice is transformed on the spot into heroin and transported by the US Air Force to Camp Bondsteed (Kosovo). There the drug is taken over by the men of Ha�im Tha�i who distribute it principally in Europe and also in the United States. The profits are used to finance the illegal operations of the CIA. Karza� and Tha�i are long-time personal friends of Bernard Kouchner, who obviously knows nothing of their criminal activities despite the international reports which have been made on the subject.

To complete his government, Nicolas Sarkozy appoints Christine Lagarde, Minister of Economy and Finance. She had made all her career in the United States where she ran the prestigious law firm of Baker & McKenzie. Within Dick Cheney’s the Center for International & Strategic Studies, she co-chaired with Zbigniew Brzezinski a working group which supervised the privatisations in Poland. She had organised intense lobbying for Lockheed Martin against the French aircraft manufacturer Dassault.

A new escapade during the summer. Nicolas, C�cilia, their joint mistress and their children were offered holidays in the USA at Wolfenboro, not far from President Bush’s property. The bill this time was paid by Robert F. Agostinelli, an Italo-New York merchant banker, a Zionist and a leading neo-conservative who gives his views in Commentary, the magazine of the American Jewish Committee.

The success of Nicolas spreads to his half-brother Pierre-Olivier. Under the Americanised name of «Oliver», he was appointed by Frank Carlucci (who was the number 2 of the CIA after having been recruited by Frank Wisner Sr.) Director of a new investment fund of the Carlyle Group (the joint management company of the portfolios of the Bushes and the Ben Ladens). Having become the 5th deal-maker in the world, he manages the principal assets of the sovereign funds of Kuwait and Singapore.

The popularity of the President is in free-fall in the opinion polls. One of his advisers in communication, Jacques S�gu�la, planned to distract the attention of the public with new «celebrity stories». The announcement of the divorce from C�cilia was published by Lib�ration, the newspaper of his friend �douard de Rothschild, to cover up the demonstrators’ slogans during a day of general strikes. Going further still, the communicator organised a meeting with the singer and former model, Carla Bruni. Several days later, her affair with the President became official and the media din again covered up the political criticisms. A few weeks later still and it was Nicolas’ third marriage. This time the witnesses whom he chose were Mathilde Agostinelli (the wife of Robert) and Nicolas Bazire, former private secretary of �douard Balladur who had become a managing partner at the Banque Rothschild.

When will the French open their eyes to see what they should do?

� Copyright 2008 by AxisofLogic.com (Translation Copyright)

Posted in Brzezinski, CIA, Rothschilds, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Αρέσει σε %d bloggers: