ΤΟ ΣΧΕΔΙΟ ΚΟΣΣΟΒΟΠΟΙΗΣΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ ΣΥΝΕΧΙΖΕΤΑΙ..

ΤΟ ΘΕΜΑ

ΤΗΣ ΛΑΘΡΟΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΕΥΣΗΣ

ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙ ΠΛΕΟΝ «ΠΕΔΙΟΝ ΔΟΞΗΣ ΛΑΜΠΡΟΝ» ΓΙΑ ΤΑ ΕΡΓΟΛΑΒΙΚΑ ΜΕΣΑ ΜΑΖΙΚΗΣ ΕΝΗΜΕΡΩΣΗΣ.

ΟΥΡΛΙΑΖΟΥΝ ΟΛΟΙ ΜΑΖΙ

ΚΑΙ ΣΚΙΖΟΥΝ ΤΑ ΙΜΑΤΙΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ «ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΣΤΙΚΗ»

ΜΕΤΑΧΕΙΡΙΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΤΑ

«ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΑ ΔΙΚΑΙΩΜΑΤΑ»

ΤΩΝ ΛΑΘΡΟΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΩΝ.

ΦΤΑΣΑΜΕ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΣΤΑ ΟΡΙΑ ΤΗΣ

ΕΘΝΙΚΗΣ ΠΡΟΔΟΣΙΑΣ!!

ΦΤΑΣΑΜΕ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΣΤΑ ΟΡΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΡΟΦΗΣ

ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ!!!!

ΟΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΙ ΥΠΗΡΕΤΕΣ

ΤΩΝ

ΠΟΛΥΠΟΛΙΤΙΣΜΙΚΩΝ ΚΕΝΤΡΩΝ

ΔΕΝ ΚΑΝΟΥΝ ΠΙΣΩ ΣΤΑ ΣΧΕΔΙΑ ΠΟΥ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΑΝΑΘΕΣΕΙ

ΟΙ ΑΦΕΝΤΕΣ ΤΟΥΣ.

ΠΑΙΖΟΥΝ ΘΕΑΤΡΟ

ΟΤΑΝ ΜΑΣ ΛΕΝΕ «ΙΣΤΟΡΙΕΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΗ»

ΕΝΩ ΤΑΥΤΟΧΡΟΝΑ ΣΧΕΔΙΑΖΟΥΝ

ΤΗΝ ΠΑΡΑΜΟΝΗ ΟΛΩΝ

ΤΩΝ ΛΑΘΡΟΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΩΝ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ.

ΟΙ ΣΕΡΒΟΙ ΧΑΣΑΝΕ ΤΟ ΚΟΣΣΟΒΟ

ΓΙΑΤΙ ΟΙ ΜΟΥΣΟΥΛΜΑΝΕΣ ΜΑΝΝΕΣ ΓΕΝΝΟΥΣΑΝ

ΠΟΛΛΑ ΠΑΙΔΙΑ.

ΓΙΑ ΤΟΝ ΙΔΙΟ ΛΟΓΟ Η ΠΑΡΑΜΟΝΗ ΤΩΝ ΛΑΘΡΟΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΩΝ

ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΘΑ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΝΕΙ ΕΝΑ

ΝΕΟ ΚΟΣΣΟΒΟ.

ΛΟΓΩ ΤΗΣ ΥΠΕΡΓΕΝΝΗΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ

ΤΩΝ ΜΟΥΣΟΥΛΜΑΝΩΝ

ΚΑΙ

ΤΗΣ ΥΠΟΓΕΝΝΗΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ

ΤΩΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΩΝ.

Νεοκλής Σαρρής

Περί ευρω-ισλαμισμού

(από σχετικό άρθρο της Cumhuriyet)

1/4

2/4

3/4

4/4

ΜΙΧΑΛΗΣ ΤΡΕΜΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ, ΤΩΝ ΟΙΚΟΛΟΓΩΝ ΠΡΑΣΙΝΩΝ:ΠΕΛΟΠΟΝΝΗΣΙΟΙ ΓΡΑΦΙΑΔΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΚΡΗΤΙΚΟΙ ΧΩΡΟΦΥΛΑΚΕΣ…

Θεσσαλονίκη, 13 Νοεμβρίου 2006.
Εργατοϋπαλληλικό Κέντρο Θεσσαλονίκης.Παρουσίαση του «Μακεδονικού Αναγνωστικού», ενός βιβλίου που αξιοποιείται έντονα από τη σκοπιανή προπαγάνδα για την απόδειξη ενός παιδικού παραμυθιού που γίνεται πιστευτό από όλους όσοι αγνοούν την Ιστορία. Δηλαδή, για την ύπαρξη «μακεδονικού» έθνους διάφορου από το ελληνικό. Εννοείται ότι δεν πρόκειται για ελληνικό αναγνωστικό, αλλά για… εγχειρίδιο γραμμένο στο ιδίωμα των Σκοπίων. Δίπλα στο πάνελ ένα πανό όπου δέσποζε το πρόσωπο του Γκότσε Ντέλτσεφ, του εθνικού ήρωα της FYROM. Ανάμεσα στους παρουσιαστές του βιβλίου ο εκπρόσωπος του κόμματος Ουράνιο Τόξο κ. Βοσκόπουλος που αυτοπροσδιορίστηκε ως «εθνικά Μακεδόνας για πολιτικούς λόγους», ο κ. Ονσούνογλου που συστήθηκε ως «Οθωμανός», ο κ. Τριαρίδης που είπε ότι είναι «ελληνόγλωσσος Σαλονικιός» και… ο κ. Μιχάλης Τρεμόπουλος!
Ο εσχάτως διάσημος επικεφαλής των Οικολόγων Πράσινων.

Τρεμόπουλος Πράσινοι Οικολόγοι

ΠΕΛΟΠΟΝΝΗΣΙΟΙ ΓΡΑΦΙΑΔΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΚΡΗΤΙΚΟΙ ΧΩΡΟΦΥΛΑΚΕΣ…

ΨΗΦΙΣΤΕ ΤΟΝ!!!

ΜΙΧΑΛΗΣ ΤΡΕΜΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ, ΤΩΝ ΟΙΚΟΛΟΓΩΝ ΠΡΑΣΙΝΩΝ, ΣΤΟ EXTRA CHANNEL

ΤΟ ΑΠΥΘΜΕΝΟ ΘΡΑΣΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟΙΟΥΔΑΙΚΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗΣ(AJC)

ΞΕΣΠΑΘΩΣΑΝ ΟΙ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟΕΒΡΑΙΟΙ ΕΝΑΝΤΙΟΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΩΝ ΕΦΗΜΕΡΙΔΩΝ «ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΟΤΥΠΙΑ» ΚΑΙ «ΑΠΟΓΕΥΜΑΤΙΝΗ» ΤΙΣ ΟΠΟΙΕΣ ΚΑΤΗΓΟΡΟΥΝ ΓΙΑ ΑΝΤΙΣΗΜΙΤΙΣΜΟ.

ΓΙΑ ΑΝΤΙΣΗΜΙΤΙΣΜΟ ΓΙΑ ΤΑ ΓΡΑΦΟΜΕΝΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΠΟΥ ΑΦΟΡΟΥΝ ΣΤΙΣ ΕΓΚΛΗΜΑΤΙΚΕΣ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΕΣ ΤΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ ΤΟΥ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ ΕΝΑΝΤΙΟΝ ΤΩΝ ΠΑΛΑΙΣΤΙΝΙΩΝ.

ΣΕ

ΑΝΑΚΟΙΝΩΣΗ

ΤΗΣ Η AJC-ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟΙΟΥΔΑΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ-ΣΕ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ ΜΕ

ΤΟ ΚΙΣ-ΚΕΝΤΡΙΚΟ ΙΣΡΑΗΛΙΤΙΚΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟ-ΠΙΕΖΕΙ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΤΑΔΙΚΗ

ΑΠΟ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΘΡΗΣΚΕΥΤΙΚΟΥΣ ΗΓΕΤΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΚΡΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΠΟΥ ΑΣΚΕΙΤΑΙ ΕΝΑΝΤΙΟΝ ΤΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ ΤΟΥ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ ΓΙΑ ΤΑ ΕΓΚΛΗΜΑΤΑ ΠΟΥ ΔΙΑΠΡΑΤΤΕΙ ΕΝΑΝΤΙΟΝ ΤΟΥ ΛΑΟΥ ΤΩΝ ΠΑΛΑΙΣΤΙΝΙΩΝ.

ΟΥΣΙΑΣΤΙΚΑ ΖΗΤΑΕΙ ΝΑ ΕΠΙΚΡΟΤΗΣΟΥΝ ΤΟ ΛΟΥΤΡΟ ΑΙΜΑΤΟΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΓΑΖΑ ΚΑΙ ΤOΝ ΦΡΙΚΤΟ ΘΑΝΑΤΟ ΧΙΛΙΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΠΛΕΟΝ

ΑΜΑΧΩΝ-ΚΥΡΙΩΣ ΓΥΝΑΙΚΟΠΑΙΔΩΝ-ΑΠΟ ΒΟΜΒΕΣ ΦΩΣΦΩΡΟΥ.

ΘΑΥΜΑΣΤΕ ΤΟΥΣ!!!!

ΘΑΥΜΑΣΤΕ ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΤΟΝ

ΚΑΛΛΙΤΕΡΟ ΤΟΥΣ ΦΙΛΟ

ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΠΟΥ ΦΙΛΟΔΟΞΕΙ ΝΑ ΓΙΝΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΠΡΩΘΥΠΟΥΡΓΟΣ.

ΘΑΥΜΑΣΤΕ  ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΤΟΝ

ΑΝΤΙΠΡΟΕΔΡΟ

ΤΗΣ ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΤΙΚΗΣ ΔΙΕΘΝΟΥΣ-ΥΠΟΥΡΓΟ ΑΜΥΝΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ.

ΔΕΙΤΕ

(ΣΤΟ ΝΕΟ ΠΑΡΑΘΥΡΟ ΚΑΝΕΤΕ ΚΛΙΚ ΕΠΑΝΩ ΣΤΑ ΟΝΟΜΑΤΑ)

ΤΩΡΑ ΠΟΙΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΑ ΠΛΟΚΑΜΙΑ

ΤΗΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟΙΟΥΔΑΙΚΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗΣ

UPDATE 21/01/09

Greek Jews criticise police for not protecting desecrated cemetery

Kristallnacht in Venezuela?

UPDATE 25/01/09

ADL Calls On European Leaders To Condemn Explosion Of Anti-Semitic Rhetoric

New York, NY, January 22, 2009 … The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today called on leaders of several European countries to publicly condemn «the explosion of anti-Semitic rhetoric» and posters and banners with Nazi imagery and Holocaust comparisons seen and heard at anti-Israel demonstrations since the outbreak of hostilities in Gaza.

the outbreak of hostilities in Gaza

UPDATE 25/01/09

ΚΑΙ Η ΞΕΦΤΥΛΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΗΓΕΣΙΑΣ

Θεσσαλονίκη: Εκδηλώσεις μνήμης για το Ολοκαύτωμα των Εβραίων

Χαιρετισμό απηύθυναν ο υπουργός Μακεδονίας-Θράκης Σταύρος Καλαφάτης, ο πρεσβευτής του Ισραήλ Αλί Γιάχια, ο πρεσβευτής της Γερμανίας Βόλφανγκ Σουλτχάϊς, ο οποίος ανέγνωσε μήνυμα του αναπληρωτή υπουργού Εξωτερικών Γκούντερ Γκλόζερ, ο νομάρχης Θεσσαλονίκης Παναγιώτης Ψωμιάδης, ο αντιδήμαρχος Βενιαμίν Καρακωστάνογλου, εκ μέρους του δημάρχου Βασίλη Παπαγεωργόπουλου, ο πρόεδρος του Κεντρικού Ισραηλιτικού Συμβουλίου Μωϋσής Κωνσταντίνης και ο πρόεδρος της Ισραηλιτικής Κοινότητας Θεσσαλονίκης Δαυίδ Σαλτιέλ.

Την κεντρική ομιλία έκανε ο βουλευτής του ΠΑΣΟΚ Ευάγγελος Βενιζέλος, ο οποίος επισήμανε ότι «όλοι υποκλινόμαστε στη μνήμη των θυμάτων του Ολοκαυτώματος και ακούμε τη σιωπηλή κραυγή τους».

ΚΑΙ Η ΟΜΟΛΟΓΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΙΣΡΑΗΛΙΝΩΝ

ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΤΑΚΟΡΥΦΗ ΑΥΞΗΣΗ

ΤΗΣ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΑΣ  ΕΜΠΡΑΚΤΗΣ ΚΡΙΤΙΚΗΣ

ΕΝΑΝΤΙΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΣΦΑΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΠΑΙΔΙΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΓΑΖΑΣ

Highest anti-Semitism rates in 2 decades

ΜΙΚΗΣ ΘΕΟΔΩΡΑΚΗΣ:ΒΓΑΛΤΕ ΤΙΣ ΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΥΣ ΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΥΣ.

Μην τους επιτρέπετε να στιγματίζουν τον αγώνα σας. Τι θα πει «κουκούλα»; Ο πραγματικός αγωνιστής και επαναστάτης ούτε ντρέπεται ούτε φοβάται να δείξει το πρόσωπό του.

ΑΝΟΙΞΤΕ ΔΡΟΜΟΥΣ.

ΑΡΘΡΟ ΤΟΥ

ΜΙΚΗ ΘΕΟΔΩΡΑΚΗ

ΜΕ ΤΙΤΛΟ

«ΟΙ «ΜΠΑΤΣΟΙ»»

ΠΟΥ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΤΗΚΕ ΣΤΙΣ 17/12/08

ΣΤΑ «ΝΕΑ» ΚΑΙ ΣΤΟ «ΡΕΣΑΛΤΟ«

Ο ΤΕΤΑΡΤΟΣ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΟΣ ΠΟΛΕΜΟΣ(ΟΜΙΛΙΑ ΤΟΥ Subcomandante Marcos La Realidad, Chiapas, Mexico)

ΑΦΙΕΡΩΝΕΤΑΙ

ΣΤΟΥΣ «ΡΟΖ ΕΠΑΝΑΣΤΑΤΕΣ» ΤΟΥ ΣΥΡΙΖΑ

ΚΑΙ

ΣΤΟΥΣ «ΓΝΩΣΤΟΥΣ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥΣ» ΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΥΣ

(ΑΝΑΡΧΙΚΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΚΙΑΣ ΣΥΜΦΟΡΑΣ)

The Fourth World War

Subcomandante Marcos

La Realidad, Chiapas, Mexico

Translated by irlandesa

The following text is an excerpt from a talk given by Subcomandante Insurgente Marcos to the International Civil Commission of Human Rights Observation in La Realidad, Chiapas on November 20, 1999. The outline for the talk was published in Letters 5.1 and 5.2 in November of the same year, with the titles «Chiapas: the War: 1, Between the Satellite and the Microscope, the Other’s Gaze,» and 2, «The Machinery of Ethnocide.» Any similarity to the conditions of the current war is purely coincidental. Published in Spanish in La Jornada, Tuesday, October 23, 2001.

The Restructuring of War

As we see it, there are several constants in the so-called world wars, in the First World War, in the Second, and in what we call the Third and Fourth.

One of these constants is the conquest of territories and their reorganization. If you consult a map of the world you can see that there were changes at the end of all of the world wars, not only in the conquest of territories, but in the forms of organization. After the First World War, there was a new world map, after the Second World War, there was another world map.

At the end of what we venture to call the «Third World War,» and which others call the Cold War, a conquest of territories and a reorganization took place. It can, broadly speaking, be situated in the late 80’s, with the collapse of the socialist camp of the Soviet Union, and, by the early 90’s, what we call the Fourth World War can be discerned.

Another constant is the destruction of the enemy. Such was the case with nazism in the second World War, and, in the Third, with all that had been known as the USSR and the socialist camp as an option to the capitalist world.

The third constant is the administration of conquest. At the moment at which the conquest of territories is achieved, it is necessary to administer them, so that the winnings can be disbursed to the force which won. We use the term ‘conquest» quite a bit, because we are experts in this. Those States, which previously called themselves national, have always tried to conquer the Indian peoples. Despite those constants, there are a series of variables which change from one world war to another: strategy, the actors, or the parties, the armaments used and, lastly, the tactics. Although the latter change, the former are present and can be applied in order to understand one war and another.

The Third World War, or the Cold War, lasted from 1946 (or, if you wish, from the bombing of Hiroshima in 1945) until 1985-1990. It was a large world war made up of many local wars. As in all the others, at the end there was a conquest of territories which destroyed an enemy. Second act, it moved to the administration of the conquest and the reorganization of territories. The actors in this world war were: one, the two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union and their respective satellites; two, the majority of the European countries; three, Latin America, Africa, parts of Asia and Oceana. The peripheral countries revolved around the US or the USSR, as it suited them. After the superpowers and the peripherals were the spectators and victims, or, that is, the rest of the world. The two superpowers did not always fight face to face. They often did so through other countries. While the large industrialized nations joined with one of the two blocs, the rest of the countries and of the population appeared as spectators or as victims. What characterized this war was: one, the arms orientation and, two, local wars. In the nuclear war, the two superpowers competed in order to see how many times they could destroy the world. The method of convincing the enemy was to present it with a very large force. At the same time, local wars were taking place everywhere in which the superpowers were involved.

The result, as we all know, was the defeat and destruction of the USSR, and the victory of the US, around which the great majority of countries have now come together. This is when what we call the «Fourth World War» broke out. And here a problem arose. The product of the previous war should have been a unipolar world – one single nation which dominated a world where there were no rivals – but, in order to make itself effective, this unipolar world would have to reach what is known as «globalization.» The world must be conceived as a large conquered territory with an enemy destroyed. It was necessary to administer this new world, and, therefore, to globalize it. They turned, then, to information technology, which, in the development of humanity, is as important as the invention of the steam engine. Computers allow one to be anywhere simultaneously. There are no longer any borders or constraints of time or geography. It is thanks to computers that the process of globalization began. Separations, differences, Nation States, all eroded, and the world became what is called, realistically, the global village.

The concept on which globalization is based is what we call «neoliberalism,» a new religion which is going to permit this process to be carried out. With this Fourth World War, once again, territories are being conquered, enemies are being destroyed and the conquest of these territories is being administered.

The problem is, what territories are being conquered and reorganized, and who is the enemy? Given that the previous enemy has disappeared, we are saying that humanity is now the enemy. The Fourth World War is destroying humanity as globalization is universalizing the market, and everything human which opposes the logic of the market is an enemy and must be destroyed. In this sense, we are all the enemy to be vanquished: indigenous, non-indigenous, human rights observers, teachers, intellectuals, artists. Anyone who believes themselves to be free and is not.

This Fourth World War uses what we call «destruction.» Territories are destroyed and depopulated. At the point at which war is waged, land must be destroyed, turned into desert. Not out of a zeal for destruction, but in order to rebuild and reorder it. What is the primary problem confronted by this unipolar world in globalizing itself? Nation States, resistances, cultures, each nation’s means of relating, that which makes them different. How is it possible for the village to be global and for everyone to be equal if there are so many differences? When we say that it is necessary to destroy Nation States and to turn them into deserts, it does not mean doing away with the people, but with the peoples’ ways of being. After destroying, one must rebuild. Rebuild the territories and give them another place. The place which the laws of the market determine. This is what is driving globalization.

The first obstacle is the Nation States: they must be attacked and destroyed. Everything which makes a State «national» must be destroyed: language, culture, economy, its political life and its social fabric. If national languages are no longer of use, they must be destroyed, and a new language must be promoted. Contrary to what one might think, it is not English, but computers. All languages must be made the same, translated into computer language, even English. All cultural aspects that make a French person French, an Italian Italian, a Dane Danish, a Mexican Mexican, must be destroyed, because they are barriers which prevent them from entering the globalized market. It is no longer a question of making one market for the French, and another for the English or the Italians. There must be one single market, in which the same person can consume the same product in any part of the world, and where the same person acts like a citizen of the world, and no longer as a citizen of a Nation State.

That means that cultural history, the history of tradition, clashes with this process and is the enemy of the Fourth World War. This is especially serious in Europe where there are nations with great traditions. The cultural framework of the French, the Italians, the English, the Germans, the Spanish, etcetera – everything which cannot be translated into computer and market terms – are an impediment to this globalization. Goods are now going to circulate through information channels, and everything else must be destroyed or set aside. Nation States have their own economic structures and what is called «national bourgeoisie» – capitalists with national headquarters and with national profits. This can no longer exist: if the economy is decided at a global level, the economic policies of Nation States which try to protect capital are an enemy which must be defeated. The Free Trade Treaty, and the one which led to the European Union, the Euro, are symptoms that the economy is being globalized, although in the beginning it was about regional globalization, like in the case of Europe. Nation States construct their political relationships, but now political relationships are of no use. I am not characterizing them as good or bad. The problem is that these political relationships are an impediment to the realization of the laws of the market. The national political class is old, it is no longer useful, it has to be changed. They try to remember, they try to remember, even if it is the name of one single statesman in Europe. They simply cannot. The most important figures in the Europe of the Euro are people like the president of the Bundesbank, a banker. What he says is going to determine the policies of the different presidents or prime ministers inflicted on the countries of Europe.

If the social fabric is broken, the old relationships of solidarity which make coexistence possible in a Nation State also break down. That is why campaigns against homosexuals and lesbians, against immigrants, or the campaigns of xenophobia, are encouraged. Everything which previously maintained a certain equilibrium has to be broken at the point at which this world war attacks a Nation State and transforms it into something else.

It is about homogenizing, of making everyone equal, and of hegemonizing a lifestyle. It is global life. Its greatest diversion should be the computer, its work should be the computer, its value as a human being should be the number of credit cards, one’s purchasing capacity, one’s productive capacity. The case of the teachers is quite clear. The one who has the most knowledge or who is the wisest is no longer valuable. Now the one who produces the most research is valuable, and that is how his salary, his grants, his place in the university, are decided.

This has a lot to do with the United States model. It also so happens, however, that this Fourth World War produces an opposite effect, which we call «fragmentation.» The world is, paradoxically, not becoming one, it is breaking up into many pieces. Although it is assumed that the citizen is being made equal, differences as differences are emerging: homosexuals and lesbians, young people, immigrants. Nation States are functioning as a large State, the anonymous State-land-society which divides us into many pieces.

If you look at a world map of this period – the end of the Third World War – and analyze the last eight years, a restructuring took place, most especially – but not only – in Europe. Where there was once one nation, now there are many nations. The world map has been fragmented. This is the paradoxical effect that is taking place because of this Fourth World War. Instead of being globalized, the world is fragmenting, and, instead of this mechanism hegemonizing and homogenizing, more and more differences are appearing. Globalization and neoliberalism are making the world an archipelago. And it must be given a market logic. These fragments must be organized into a common denominator. It is what we call «financial bomb.»

At the same time that differences appear, the differences are multiplied. Each young person has his group, his way of thinking, such as punks and skinheads. All of which are in every country. Now the different are not only different, but their differences are multiplied and they seek their own identity. The Fourth World War is obviously not offering them a mirror that allows them to see themselves with a common denominator. It is offering them a broken mirror. As long as it has control of the archipelago – of human beings – the powers are not going to be very upset.

The world is breaking into many pieces, large and small. There are no longer continents in the sense that I would be a European, African or American. What the globalization of neoliberalism is offering is a network built by financial capital, or, if you would prefer, by financial powers. If there is a crisis in this node, the rest of the network will cushion the effects. If there is prosperity in a country, it does not produce the effect of prosperity in other countries. It is, thus, a network which does not function. What they told us about the size of the world was a lie, a speech repeated by the leaders of Latin America, whether Menem, Fujimori, Zedillo, or others leaders of compromised moral character. In fact what is happening is that the network has made Nation States much more vulnerable. It is useless for a country to struggle to construct an equilibrium and its own destiny as a nation. Everything depends on what happens in a bank in Japan, or what the mafia in Russia or a speculator in Sydney does. In one way or another, Nation States are not saved, they are permanently condemned. When a Nation State agrees to join this network – because there is no other choice, because they force it, or out of conviction – it is signing its death certificate.

In short, what this great market wants is to turn all of these islands into commercial centers, not nations. One can go from one country to another and find the same products. There is no longer any difference. In Paris or in San Cristóbal de las Casas you can consume the same thing. If you are in San Cristóbal de Las Casas, you can simultaneously be in Paris getting the news. It is the end of Nation States. And not just that: it is the end of the human beings who make them up. What matters is the law of the market, and that is what establishes how much you produce, how much you are worth, how much you buy, how much you are worth. Dignity, resistance, solidarity all disturb. Everything which prevents a human being from turning into a producing and purchasing machine is an enemy, and it must be destroyed. That is why we are saying that the human species is the enemy for the Fourth World War. It is not destroying it physically, but it is destroying its humanness.

Paradoxically, by destroying Nation States, dignity, resistance and solidarity are built anew. There are no ties stronger, more solid, than those which exist between different groups: between homosexuals, between lesbians, between young people, between migrants. This war, then, goes on to also attack those who are different. That is what those campaigns are owing to, so strong in Europe and in the United States, against the different, because they are dark, speak another language or have another culture. The means of cultivating xenophobia in what remains of the Nation States is to make threats: «These Turkish migrants want to take away your job.» «These Mexican immigrants came to rape, they came to steal, they came to sow bad habits.» Nation States – or the few of them that remain – delegate to those new citizens of the world – computers – the role of getting rid of those immigrants. And that is when groups like the Ku Klux Klan proliferate, or persons of such probity as Berlusconi reach power. They all build their campaigns based on xenophobia. Hate for the different, persecution against anything that is different, is worldwide. But the resistance of anything that is different is also worldwide. Faced with that aggression, these differences are multiplied, they are solidified. This is how it is, I am not going to characterize it as good or bad, that is how it is happening.

The War Is Not Only Military

In strictly military terms, the Third World War had its logic. It was, in the first place, a conventional war, conceptualized in such a way that, if I put in soldiers, and you put in soldiers, we confront each other, and whoever is left alive wins. This took place in a specific territory which, in the case of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO, forces, and the Warsaw Pact, was Europe. Starting from a conventional war, between armies, a military and weapons oriented path was established.

We are going to look at the details a bit more. This [he shows a rifle], for example, is a semi-automatic weapon, and it’s called an AR-15 automatic rifle. They manufactured it for the Vietnam conflict, and it can be taken apart very easily [he disarms it], there it is. When they made it, the Americans were thinking about a conventional war scenario, that is, large military contingents which confronted each other. «We’ll collect a lot of soldiers, we’ll advance, and in the end someone will have to be left.» At the same time, the Warsaw Pact was developing the Kalashnikov automatic rifle, which is commonly called the AK-47, a weapon with a lot of firing volume at short range, up to 400 meters. The Soviet concept involved large waves of troops: a mountain of soldiers would advance, firing, and, if they died, a second and a third wave would arrive. The one who had the most soldiers would win.

The Americans then thought: «The old Garand rifle from the Second World War isn’t of any use anymore. Now we need a weapon that has a lot of short-range firing power.» They took out the AR-15 and tested it in Vietnam. The problem was that it broke down, it didn’t work. When they attacked the Viet Cong, the mechanism remained open, and when they fired it went «click.» And it wasn’t a camera, it was a weapon. They tried to solve the problem with an M16-A1 model. Here the trick is in the bullets, which are called two different things. One, the civilian, 2.223 of an inch – can be bought in any store in the United States. The other – 5.56 millimeter – is for the exclusive use of NATO. This is a very fast bullet and it has a trick to it. In war, the objective is to see that the enemy has losses, not deaths, and an army considers itself to have casualties when a soldier can no longer fight. The Geneva Convention – an agreement to humanize war – forbids expanding bullets, because at the point at which it enters it destroys more, and it’s a lot more lethal than a hard tipped bullet.

«Given that the idea is to increase the number of wounded and decrease the number of dead,» – they said – «we are prohibiting expansive bullets.» A shot from a hard bullet leaves you useless, you’re a casualty now, it doesn’t kill you unless it reaches a vital organ. In order to fulfill the Geneva Convention and to dupe them, the Americans created the soft tip bullet which, when it enters the human body, bends and turns. The entrance hole is one size, and the exit hole is much bigger. This bullet is worse than the expanding one, and it doesn’t violate conventions. Nonetheless, if it gets you in the arm…it will blow you up. A 162 bullet goes through you and leaves you wounded, but this one destroys you. Coincidentally, the Mexican government has just bought 16,000 of these bullets.

That is, weapons are created for precise scenarios. We are going to assume they don’t want to use the nuclear bomb. What are they going to use? Many soldiers against many soldiers. And so the NATO and Warsaw Pact conventional war doctrines were created.

The second option was a localized nuclear war, a war with nuclear weapons, but only in some places and not in others. There was an agreement between the two superpowers to not attack each other in their own lands, and to fight only on neutral ground. It remains to be said that that this ground was Europe. That’s where the bombs were going to fall and one would see who would be left alive in Western Europe and what was then called Eastern Europe.

The last option of the Third World War was total nuclear war, which was a huge business, the business of the century. The logic of nuclear war is that there would be no winner. It doesn’t matter who fired first, no matter how quickly he fired, the other would be able to fire also. The destruction was mutual, and, from the beginning, this option was simply renounced. The nature of it came to be what is called in military diplomatic terms, «deterrence.»

So that the Soviets wouldn’t use nuclear weapons, the Americans developed many nuclear weapons, and, so that they wouldn’t use nuclear weapons, the Soviets developed many nuclear weapons, and so on. They called it IBM (Intercontinental Ballistic Missile), and they were the rockets that went from Russia to the United States and from the United States to Russia. They cost a fortune, and now they’re not useful for anything. There were also other nuclear weapons for local use which were the ones they were going to use in Europe in the case of a localized nuclear war.

When this phase began, in 1945, there was a war to be fought because Europe was divided in two. The military strategy – we are speaking of the purely military aspects – was the following: a few forward positions in front of the enemy line, a line of permanent logistics, and the mother country, called the United States or the Soviet Union. The logistical line supplied the forward positions. Large airplanes that were in the air 24 hours a day, the B-52 Fortress, carried the nuclear bombs, and they never had to land. And there were the pacts. The NATO Pact, the Warsaw Pact and the SEATO (South East Asia Treaty Organization) Pact, which is like the NATO of the Asian countries. The model was put into play in local wars. Everything had a logic, and it was logical to fight in Vietnam, which was an agreed scenario. The local armies and insurgents were in the role of the forward positions. In the role of permanent logistics were the lines of clandestine or legal arms sales, and, in the role of the mother countries, the two superpowers. And there was also an agreement about the places where they had to remain as spectators. The clearest examples of these local wars are the dictatorships of Latin America, the conflicts in Asia, especially Vietnam, and the wars in Africa. These apparently had absolutely no logic whatsoever, since the majority of the time what was going on wasn’t understood. But what was happening was part of this outline of conventional war.

It was during this period – and that is important – that the concept of «total war» was being developed. Elements which are no longer military enter into military doctrine. For example, in Vietnam, from the Tet offensive (1968) until the fall of Saigon (1975), the media again became a very important battle front. And so, the idea began to develop in the military that military power was not enough. It was necessary to incorporate others, such as the media. And also that the enemy could be attacked with economic measures, with political measures and with diplomacy, which is the game of the United Nations and of international organizations. Some countries create sabotage in order to secure the condemnation or censuring of others, which is called «diplomatic war.»

All these wars followed the domino theory. It sounds ridiculous, but they were like two rivals playing dominoes with the rest of the population. One of the opponents would put down a piece, and the other would try to put his down in order to cut off the follow-up. It is the theory of that illustrious individual by the name of Kissinger, the Secretary of State for the United States government during the Vietnam era, who said: «We cannot abandon Vietnam because it would mean giving up the game of dominoes in Southeast Asia to the others.» And that is why they did what they did in Vietnam.

It was also about trying to regain the logic of the Second World War. For most of the population, it [the Second World War] had been heroic. There was the image of the Marines liberating France from the dictatorship, liberating Italy from the Duce, liberating Germany from the military, the red army entering from all sides. The Second World War was supposedly waged in order to eliminate a danger for all humanity, that of national socialism. Thus the local wars attempted, one way or another, to regain the ideology of «we are acting in the defense of the free world.» But now Moscow was in the role of national socialism. And Moscow, for its part, did the same thing: both superpowers tried to use the argument of «democracy» and the «free world», as each of them conceived it.

Afterwards came the Fourth World War, which destroyed everything from before, because the world is no longer the same, and the same strategy cannot be applied. The concept of «total war» was developed further: it is not only a war on all fronts, it is a war which can be anywhere, a total war in which the entire world is at stake. «Total war» means: at any moment, in any place, under any circumstances. The idea of fighting for one place in particular no longer exists. Now the fight can take place at any moment. There is no longer the concept of escalation of the conflict with threats, the taking of positions and attempts to reposition oneself. At any moment and in any circumstances, a conflict can arise. It can be domestic problem, it can be a dictator and everything which the last wars of the last five years have been, from Kosovo to the Persian Gulf War. The entire military routine of the Cold War has, thus, been destroyed.

It is not possible to make war, in the Fourth World War, under the criteria of the Third, because now I have to fight any place, I don’t know where I’m going to have to fight, nor do I know when, I have to act rapidly, I don’t even know what circumstances I’m going to have to prosecute this war. In order to resolve the problem, the military first developed the «rapid deployment» war. An example would be the Persian Gulf War, a war which involved a great accumulation of military force in a short period of time, a large military action in a short period of time, the conquering of territories and withdrawal. The invasion of Panama would be another example of rapid deployment. There is, in fact, a NATO contingent which is called «rapid intervention force.» Rapid deployment is a large mass of military force which throws itself against the enemy and which makes no distinction between a children’s hospital and a chemical weapons factory. That is what happened in Iraq: the smart bombs were quite stupid, they made no distinctions. And that’s where they remained, because they realized that this is quite expensive, and it contributes very little. In Iraq they made an entire deployment, but there was no conquest of territory. There were the problems of the local protests, there were the international human rights observers.

They had to withdraw. Vietnam had already taught them that, in these instances, it is not prudent to insist: «No, we can’t do this now,» they said. They then moved on to the strategy of «projection of force.» «Better to have forward positions in North American military bases all over the world, accumulating a great continental force which, in a matter of hours or days, will have the capacity to put in military units any place in the world.» And they can, in fact, put in a division of four or five thousand men in the most distant point in the planet in four days, and more, constantly more.

But the projection of force has the problem of being based on local soldiers, or, rather, on US soldiers. They believe that, if the conflict is not resolved rapidly, the body bags, the dead, will begin arriving, like in Vietnam, and this could provoke many domestic protests in North America, or in whichever country. In order to avoid those problems, they abandoned the projection of force, making – let us be clear – mercantile calculations. They did not make calculations about the destruction of the human forces, or the natural ones, but of publicity and image. And so the war of projection was abandoned, and they went on to a model of war with local soldiers, more international help, more of a supranational body. Now it was not about sending soldiers, but of fighting by means of the soldiers who were there, helping them according to the basis of the conflict, and not using the model of a nation which declares war, but of a supranational body like the UN or NATO. The ones doing the dirty work are the local soldiers, and the ones in the newspapers are the Americans and the international support. This is the model. Protesting no longer works: it is not a war of the United States government. It’s a war by NATO, and, besides, NATO is merely doing the favor of helping the UN.

Throughout the entire world, the restructuring of armies is so that they can confront a local conflict with international support under supranational cover, and under the disguise of humanitarian war. It has to do with saving the population from a genocide by killing it. And that is what happened in Kosovo. Milosevich waged a war against humanity: «If we confront Milosevich, we are defending humanity.» That is the argument the NATO generals used and which brought so many problems to the European left: opposing NATO bombings implied supporting Milosevich, better, then, to support the NATO bombings. And Milosevich, you know, was armed by the United States. The military conception – which is what is now at play – is that the entirety of the world – whether Sri Lanka or any other country, the most distant one can think of – is now the backyard, because the globalized world produces simultaneity. And that is the problem: in this globalized world, anything that happens any place affects the new international order. The world is no longer the world, it’s a village, and everything is very close. Therefore the great policemen of the world – especially the United States – have the right to intervene anywhere, at any time, under any circumstances. They can consider anything as a threat to their domestic security. They can easily decide that the indigenous uprising in Chiapas threatens the domestic security of North America, or the Tamils in Sri Lanka, or whatever you want. Any movement – and not necessarily armed – anyplace can be considered a threat to domestic security.

What is that has happened? The old strategies and old concepts of making war have collapsed. Let us see.

«Theatre of operations» is the military term for indicating the place where the war is going to occur. In the Third World War, Europe was the theatre of operations. Now it is not known where it is going to break out, it could be any place, it is no longer certain that it is going to be in Europe. Military doctrine moves from what is called «system» to what they call «versatility.» «I have to be ready to do anything at any moment. A plan is no longer sufficient: now I need many plans, not just to construct a response to particular incidents, but to construct many military responses to specific incidents.» This is where information technology intervenes. This change leads to moving from the systematic, the inflexible, the rigid, to the versatile, to that which can change from one moment to the next. And that is going to define the entire new military doctrine of armies, of military corps and of soldiers. This will be one element in the Fourth World War. The other will be the movement from «containment strategy» to that of «drawing out» or «extension»: now it is not just about conquering territory, containing the enemy, now it is about prolonging the conflict to what they call «non-war acts.» In the case of Chiapas, this has to do with taking out and putting in governments and municipal presidents, with human rights, with the media, etcetera.

Included in the new military conception is an intensification of the conquest of territory. This means that it is necessary to not only be concerned about the EZLN and its military force, but also about the church, the NGOs, international observers, the press, civilians, etcetera. There are no longer civilians and neutrals. The entire world is part of the conflict.

This implies that national armies are of no use, because they no longer have to defend Nation States. If there are no Nation States, what are they going to defend? Under the new doctrine, national armies go on to play the role of local police. The case of Mexico is quite clear: the Mexican Army is doing more and more police work, like the fight against drug trafficking, or this new body against organized crime which is called the Federal Preventative Police and which is made up of military personnel. It is about national armies turning into local police in the manner of a US comic book: a Super Cop, a Super Police. When the army in the former Yugoslavia was reorganized, it had to turn into a local police force, and NATO is going to be its Super Cop, its senior partner in political terms. The star is the supranational body, in this case NATO or the US army, and the extras are the local armies.

But national armies were built on the basis of a doctrine of «national security.» If there are enemies or dangers to the security of a nation, their work is to maintain security, sometimes against an external enemy, sometimes against destabilizing domestic enemies. This is the doctrine of the Third World War or Cold War. Under these assumptions, national armies develop a national conscious which now makes it difficult to turn them into police friends of the Super Police. Thus the doctrine of national security must now be transformed into «national stability.» The point is no longer defending the nation. Since the main enemy of national stability is drug trafficking, and drug trafficking is international, national armies which operate under the banner of national stability accept international aid or international interference from other countries.

The problem of again reordering national armies exists at the world level. Now we go down to America, and from there to Latin America. The process is a bit similar to that which took place in Europe and which was seen in the Kosovo war with NATO. In the case of Latin America, there is the Organization of American States, the OAS, with the Hemispheric Defense System. According to the former president of Argentina, Menem, all the countries of Latin America are threatened and we need to unite, destroying the national consciences of the armies, and to make a great army under the doctrine of a hemispheric defense system, using the argument of drug trafficking. Given that what is at stake is versatility – or the capacity to make war at any moment, in any place and under any circumstances – rehearsals begin. The few bastions of national defense which still exist must be destroyed by this hemispheric system. If it was Kosovo in Europe, in Latin America it is Colombia and Chiapas. How is this system of hemispheric defense constructed? In two ways. In Colombia, where the threat of drug trafficking is present, the government is asking for everyone’s help: «We have to intervene because drug trafficking not only affects Colombia, but the entire continent.» In the case of Chiapas, the concept of total war is applied. Everyone is a part, there are no neutrals, you are either an ally or you are an enemy.

The New Conquest

In the fragmentation process – turning the entire world into an archipelago – financial power wants to build a new shopping center which will have tourism and natural resources in Chiapas, Belize and Guatemala.

Apart from being full of oil and uranium, the problem is that it is full of indigenous. And the indigenous, in addition to not speaking Spanish, do not want credit cards, they do not produce, they are involved in planting maize, beans, chile, coffee, and they think about dancing to a marimba rather than using a computer. They are neither consumers nor producers. They are superfluous. And everything that is superfluous is expendable. But they do not want to go, and they do not want to stop being indigenous. There is more: their struggle is not to take over power. There struggle is to be recognized as Indian peoples, that their right to exist is recognized, without having to turn into other people.

But the problem is that here, in the land that is at war, in zapatista territory, are the main indigenous cultures, there are the languages and the largest oil deposits. There are the seven Indian peoples who participate in the EZLN, Tzeltal, Tzotzil, Tojolabal, Chol, Zoque, Mam and mestizos. This is the map of Chiapas: communities with an indigenous population and with oil, uranium and precious wood. For neoliberalism everything is merchandise, it is sold, it is exploited. And these indigenous come to say no, that the land is mother, it is the depository of culture, that history lives here, and the dead live here. Absolutely absurd things that cannot be entered on any computer and which are not listed on a stock exchange. And there is no way to convince them to be good, to learn to think right, they simply do not want to. They even rose up in arms. This is why – we say – that the Mexican government does not want to make peace: it is because they want to do away with this enemy and turn this land to desert, afterwards reorganizing it and setting it to operate as a huge shopping center, a Mall in the Mexican Southeast. The EZLN supports the Indian peoples, and is, in this way, an enemy, but not the main one. It is not enough to sort things out with the EZLN, even worse if sorting things out with the EZLN means renouncing this land, because that will mean peace in Chiapas, it will mean renouncing the conquest of a land rich in oil, in precious woods and uranium. This is why they have not done so and are not going to do so.

Published in In Motion Magazine November 11, 2001.

ΜΕΓΑΛΗ ΒΡΕΤΤΑΝΙΑ:ΣΕ ΚΑΘΕ ΣΧΟΛΕΙΟ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΥΠΑΡΧΕΙ ΕΙΔΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΔΑΣΚΩΝ ΕΠΙ ΤΟΥ ΟΛΟΚΑΥΤΩΜΑΤΟΣ

ΣΤΑ ΠΛΑΙΣΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΠΡΩΤΟΒΟΥΛΙΑΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΤΑΠΟΛΕΜΗΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΡΑΤΣΙΣΜΟΥ.

holocaust_memorial_(holocaust_mahnmal)

ΚΑΘΕ ΣΧΟΛΕΙΟ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟΒΑΘΜΙΑΣ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΜΕΓΑΛΗ ΒΡΕΤΤΑΝΙΑ ΘΑ ΑΠΟΚΤΗΣΕΙ

ΕΙΔΙΚΟ ΕΠΙ ΤΗΣ ΔΙΔΑΣΚΑΛΙΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΟΛΟΚΑΥΤΩΜΑΤΟΣ

ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΕΞΑΣΦΑΛΙΣΤΕΙ ΟΤΙ ΤΟ ΑΝΤΙΚΕΙΜΕΝΟ ΘΑ ΔΙΔΑΣΚΕΤΑΙ ΣΦΑΙΡΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΜΕ ΕΥΑΙΣΘΗΣΙΑ.

ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΚΑΤΑΛΗΞΟΥΝ ΣΤΟ ΠΑΡΑΠΑΝΩ

ΕΧΕΙ ΓΙΝΕΙ ΕΡΕΥΝΑ

ΓΙΑ ΤΙΣ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΤΙΚΕΣ ΣΥΝΘΗΚΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΙΣ ΠΡΟΚΛΗΣΕΙΣ ΠΟΥ ΑΝΤΙΜΕΤΩΠΙΖΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΚΑΘΗΓΗΤΕΣ.

ΤΙ ΚΡΥΒΕΤΑΙ ΠΙΣΩ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΕΚΣΤΡΑΤΕΙΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΟΛΟΚΑΥΤΩΜΑ ΚΑΙ ΠΟΙΟΥΣ ΣΚΟΠΟΥΣ ΑΡΑΓΕ ΕΞΥΠΗΡΕΤΕΙ?

ΚΑΙ

ΓΙΑΤΙ ΔΕΝ ΥΠΑΡΧΕΙ ΚΑΝΕΝΑ ΠΑΡΟΜΟΙΟ ΠΡΟΗΓΟΥΜΕΝΟ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΛΛΟΥΣ ΛΑΟΥΣ ΠΟΥ ΥΠΕΣΤΗΣΑΝ ΟΛΟΚΑΥΤΩΜΑ?

ΕΞΑΛΛΟΥ ΣΤΙΣ ΗΠΑ

Η ΠΟΛΙΤΕΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΝΕΑΣ ΥΟΡΚΗΣ ΕΧΕΙ ΠΡΟΧΩΡΗΣΕΙ ΗΔΗ ΒΑΖΟΝΤΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ

ΣΧΕΤΙΚΗ ΑΓΓΕΛΙΑ

ΓΙΑ ΖΗΤΗΣΗ ΕΙΔΙΚΩΝ ΕΠΙ ΤΟΥ ΟΛΟΚΑΥΤΩΜΑΤΟΣ.

Η ΔΙΑΣΤΡΕΒΛΩΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΣ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΚΑΤΑΓΩΓΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΩΝ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟΣΚΟΠΙΑΝΟΥΣ ΚΟΝΔΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΥΣ

ΤΑ ΣΧΕΔΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΗΠΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΠΕΡΙΛΑΜΒΑΝΟΥΝ ΟΠΩΣ ΦΑΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΗ ΕΞΑΦΑΝΙΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ ΜΕ ΑΙΧΜΗ ΤΟΥ ΔΟΡΑΤΟΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΣΚΟΠΙΑΝΟΥΣ ΚΟΝΔΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΥΣ ΤΟΥΣ.

ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΥΧΑΙΟ ΤΟ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΣ ΟΤΙ ΓΡΑΦΟΝΤΑΙ ΧΙΛΙΑΔΕΣ ΑΡΘΡΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΥΣ GOLDEN BOYS -ΤΟΥΣ ΣΚΟΠΙΑΝΟΥΣ- ΚΟΝΔΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΥΣ -ΥΠΟΤΡΟΦΟΥΣ ΤΩΝ ΕΙΔΙΚΩΝ ΙΔΡΥΜΑΤΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΗΠΑ, ΣΥΝΕΠΙΚΟΥΡΟΥΜΕΝΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟ «ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ» GOLDEN BOYS ΠΟΥ ΞΑΝΑΓΡΑΦΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΙΔΙΟ ΣΤΟΧΟ.

ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΟΥΝ ΝΑ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΗΣΟΥΝ ΜΙΑ «ΝΕΑ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ» ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΟΠΟΙΑ ΘΑ ΑΠΟΥΣΙΑΖΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕ ΜΟΝΑΔΙΚΗ ΤΕΧΝΗ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΟΥΝ ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ ΜΕ ΣΚΟΠΟ ΝΑ ΤΥΦΛΩΣΟΥΝ ΤΟΥΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΕΣ ΟΛΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΣΜΟΥ ΑΝΤΙΣΤΡΕΦΟΝΤΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΑΣΤΡΕΒΛΩΝΟΝΤΑΣ ΤΑ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΑ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΤΑ.

ΔΙΑΒΑΣΤΕ ΛΟΙΠΟΝ ΤΑ ΠΑΡΑΚΑΤΩ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΕΤΕ ΤΟ ΜΕΓΕΘΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΖΗΜΙΑΣ ΠΟΥ ΓΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΣΕ ΒΑΡΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ ΜΑΣ ΚΑΙ  ΤΗΝ ΑΠΟΥΣΙΑ ΑΝΤΙΛΟΓΟΥ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΠΝΕΥΜΑΤΙΚΟΥΣ ΤΑΓΟΥΣ ΠΟΥ ΛΟΥΦΑΖΟΥΝ ΑΝΑΜΕΝΟΝΤΑΣ ΤΑ ΚΟΝΔΥΛΙΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΙΣ ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΣ ΔΡΑΣΕΙΣ.

ΠΟΙΟΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ Ο RISTO STEFOV

Risto Stefov

What is the Macedonian Question? – Cutting through the Rhetoric

September 22, 2008

Risto Stefov

Let´s Not Forget the Exiled Macedonians from Greece

September 21, 2008

Risto Stefov

The Forced Homogenization of Populations in Greek Macedonia

September 20, 2008

Risto Stefov

ΤΑΚΤΙΚΟΥ ΑΡΘΡΟΓΡΑΦΟΥ ΤΗΣ AMERICAN CHRONICLE

ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΣΕΛΙΔΑ MAKNEWS.COM

»	CSIS Conference with Meto Koloski – Oct 2, Washington
»	Vinozhito Comments on UN Visit
»	Pics from the Sv Nedela Event (Ajax)
»	UMD Letter to Senator Obama
»	Miloshoski, Bakoyannis Met in Paris
»	Greek Authorities Continue to Harass Panayote Dimitras • BBC Interview with Dimitras • (Macedonian – English subtitles)
»	Dejang Holds Talks with Crvenkovski
»	Sv Nedlea (Ajax) Banquet – Saturday Sept 20
»	The Forced Homogenization of Populations in Greek Macedonia
»	MHRMI Applauds UN Minority Investigation in Greece
»	Sv Dimitrija Festival (Markham)
»	UMD Announces Historic $150,000 Grant Agreement
»	Greece Reacts to UN Visit by Closing the Border with Macedonia
»	The Ongoing Harrassment of Greek Helsinki Monitor
»	Greek Policy Against Macedonians
»	UMD Celebrates Macedonian Independence Day
»	The Macedonians in Greece – Part 8
»	Macedonian Struggle for Independence Part IX
»	Macedonian Digest 33
»	The Contest For Macedonian Identity 1870-1912 (book review)
»	MP Temelkovski on Macedonia’s Name (youtube)
»	Greek Fascists Cause Incident in Macedonian Village
»	Pavle on Greek TV (YouTube – Greek w Mac Subtitles)
»	Rep. Ed Royce Shills for Greek Racists
»	Macedonia Offers Money for Babies
»	Diane Talevski Olive Tree Cancer Site
»	Four Killed in Ohrid Plane Crash Pic 1 •  Pic 2 •  Pic 3 •  Pic 4
»	Wildfires in Macedonia
»	Parliament Adopts Resolution on Aegean Refugees
»	Gruevski Not Aware of any ‘Secret American Plan’
»	Ka Mi Ispadnala Moma Katerina (youtube)
»	Celebrating the Macedonian Heritage in Turkey
»	The Award for Worst Foreign Policy Goes to Greece (Spectator)
»	Meto Koloski Interview with Makdonsko Sonce (.pdf)
»	WMC Warns Macedonian Government • Ban Ki-moon Replies to Gruevski • Government Considers the Issue Multiplex
»	Pavle Voskopoulos on Greek MegaTV (i) • Continued here… • Another Interview Here
»	Please Sponsor Bill Nicholov in his fight Against Cancer
»	Greece’s Neurosis with Flags (youtube)
»	Stoiko Stoikov Defends Macedonians in Bulgaria (mp3 audio interview in Bulgarian)
»	Gruevski Wants MOC Part of Name Talks
»	Greece Brings its Virulent Racism to the Olympics • Three Macedonians Finish Olympic Competition
»	Macedonian Refugee Children: Exodus Anniversary
»	Macedonian Minority No Threat to Greece
»	Some Pics from the Lerin Picnic in Toronto
»	Streaming Macedonian TV
»	AMHRC Comments on Barroso’s Irresponsible Reply
»	Some Pictures from Ilinden in Toronto
»	Macedonia Defends Itself from Greek Aggression
»	US Senate Confirms New Macedonian Ambassador • Snowe, Menendez Tried to Block New Ambassador • Greek Lobby Meddling with Ambassadorial Appointments • Biden, Menendez Stooges of Greek/Armenian Lobby
»	Homogenizers in Retreat
»	Gruevski Seeks NATO, OSCE Help on Minority Issue
»	Macedonia Cannot Accept a Dictate from Greece
»	Gruevski Asked The European Union to Help End the Persecution of Macedonians in Greece (Karamanlis Letter)
»	Here is the EU’s Disgraceful Response The EU prefers to cover up rights abuses in its member states, rather than deal with them.
»	Miloshoski Asks the EC to Support the Language Rights of the Macedonians in Greece It’s 2008 and the EU can’t even implement basic language rights in Greece.
»	Human Rights Watch on Greece’s Minority Abuses • Greek Helsinki Monitor on the Macedonians in Greece
»	Kostas Karamanlis Replies to Nikola Gruevski • Athens Claims There is no Macedonian Minority in Greece • Interview with Greek Spokesman, Koumoutsakos
»	Greece Continues To Refuse Macedonian Registration • Interview with Pavlos Voskopoulos
»	• Protect Macedonia’s Name! S. Res. 300 • Greece Denies Macedonians Their Ethnic Identity • Greece Obfuscating on Minority Abuses
»	Risto Stefov Comments on the «Name Issue» (youtube) • Meto Koloski Interview (youtube)
»	Ideological Nature of Macedonian-Greek Name Dispute
»	Macedonia to Greece: You Rename Solun Airport
»	Watch Macedonian TV Online
»	Democracy in Macedonia: The Crying Game • SDSM Needs to Get its Act Together
»	Greek Racists Attack Macedonian Trucker • Greece Pretends Macedonians Not Harrassed
»	Aegean Refugee Children Attend Rally
»	1947 UN Commision Established the Existence of the Macedonian Minority in Greece • Macedonians in the US Army in WWI
»	Greek Racist Group Meets with Daniel Fried
»	IPI/SEEMOExpresses Concern After Journalists Denied Entry Into Greece
»	Macedonia’s ‘Short-Sightedness’ in Cooperation With Russia
»	• Video of the Ovcharani Event (youtube) • Festival Vo Ovcharani (youtube) • Mega News (Greece) Comments on the ‘Skopianoi’ • Dance Group Harrassed at the Border • Greek Racists Bothering People at the Border • Amateur Video of Tanec — Video 2 cont… • Florina Festival Tensions Eased (Kathimerini)
»	UMD Applauds Raising Issue of the Aegan Macedonians
»	Greek Lunatic Asylum – Pity the Macedonians (youtube)
»	The British Foreign Office and Macedonian Identity – Rossos
»	Greek Census of 1921 Recorded 500,000 Macedonians
»	WordPress Macedonian History Blog
»	Narodno Delo Revisited
»	Thank You Robyn Poupel
»	From Pollitecon.com • Treaties and Legal Cases • Detailed Topographical Maps • Life in Aegean Macedonia • The Contest For Macedonian Identity 1870-1912
»	Cambridge University Press and Anstasia Karakasidou

» click here for older articles Articles, Essays and Opinions Anthony Ambrozic Amnesty International Odisej Belchevsy James Bissett Victor Bivell British Helsinki Aleksandar Donski Chris Elinchev Virginia Evans Alex Gigeroff Steve Gligorov Greek Helsinki Monitor HLA Genes in Macedonians Human Rights Watch Igor Janev Diana Johnstone Katerina King of Greece v Greece Metodija Koloski Minority Language – EBLUL Peter Medichkov Krste P. Misirkov George Nakratzas Bill Nicholov Nestor Oginar Pan-Macedonian Resolutions Chris Purdef Liljana Ristova Andrew Rossos Carl Savich Galina Schneider Michael Seraphinoff Angel Shopov Sidiropoulos v. Greece Sinadinoski Joseph Skulj Slav (Misuse of) Ireneusz Slupkov Nikola Spasikov Tomáš Spevák Stankov v. Bulgaria Risto Stefov Jewel Stoyan Lazar Temelko Nikodim Tsarknias UN Resolutions US Helsinki on Greece Sasha Uzunov Sam Vaknin Tom Vangelovski submit articles to: contact@maknews.com Anthony Ambrozic • Tavola de Este Transcription List of Authors Odisej Belchevsky • Musings on the Macedonian Language • Classical Mythology Explained With The Use of Macedonian Vocabulary • A Study of the Origins of the Word Reka, «River» • Macedonian Language from Greece List of Authors James Bissett • We Created A Monster • War on Terrorism Skipped the KLA List of Authors Victor Bivell • Stabilizing Relations Between Ethnic Macedonians and Ethnic Albanians in Macedonia • Time to Reclaim Macedonia • Restoring Peace and Prosperity to Macedonia – The Rule of Numbers • My First Visit To My Birthplace • My First Step Abroad • The Migrant Experience: From Village to Suburb • A Review of ‘Fields of Wheat, Hills of Blood’ • Makedonska Iskra Project Well Advanced • Interview with Mick Veloskey • Speech for Book Launch of A Girl From Neret • Speech for Book Launch of From War To Whittlesea • The Ancient and Modern Macedonians are Related, says Author • The Human Rights Situation of Macedonians in Greece and Australia List of Authors Aleksandar Donski • Greek Proposal for a Sovereign Macedonia List of Authors Chris Elinchev • Letter to the American Hellenic Institute List of Authors Virginia Evans • Diary of a First Time Demonstrator • D’mbeni – A little History, a Lot of Memories List of Authors Alex Gigeroff • Zorba the Greek Unmasked: Chorba the Macedonian List of Authors Steve Gligorov • Greek NATO Veto of Macedonia a Civil Rights Problem for the EU List of Authors Igor Janev • Remarks On the Legal Status of Macedonia in the UN • UN’s Irregular Admission of Macedonia • Proposal for Resolving the Dispute Over Macedonia’s Name • On the Legal Status of Macedonia in the UN Letter to Ban Ki-Moon • Annex 1 • Annex 2 • Supplementary 1 List of Authors Katerina • A View from the Other Side List of Authors King v Greece • The Former King of Greece v Greece – Summary • European Court of Human Rights Case The Former King of Greece v Greece – Judgement List of Authors Metodija Koloski • Macedonian Orthodox Youth Association of North America • Letter to the Illinois Senate • Introductory Session on Albanians in the Balkans • World Refugee Day – Detsa Belgaci • Decentralization, or Euro-Discrimination? • Letter Criticizing VOA’s Use of FYROM • Macedonian Group Meets With Matthew Nimetz • Letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice • Appalled by Humiliation of Macedonian Folklore Group • UMD Condemns Terrorist Attacks on Vratnica Police Station • Commemorating the 102nd Anniversary of the Macedonian National Holiday Ilinden • Forgotten Discrimination in the European Union • Letter to Prime Minister Papoulias • UMD Press Release on House of Representatives • Embassy PR on Resolutions Dealing with Macedonia’s Name • Macedonian History Books: Facts and Arguments List of Authors Minority Language – EBLUL • Remarks by Athanasios Parisis List of Authors Peter Medichkov • Greek Acts Against the Ethnic Macedonian Population List of Authors Krste Petkov Misirkov • On Macedonian Matters List of Authors George Nakratzas • Open Letter to the Greek Prime Minister on the Matter of Greek Racial Profiling • Open Letter to the Greek Prime Minister Regarding the Blacklisting of Macedonian Political Refugees • The So-Called Genocide of the Greeks of Asia Minor • Greece’s Problems with the Republic of Macedonia List of Authors Nestor Oginar • Speech at the Schiller Institute Annual Congress List of Authors Bill Nicholov • MHRMC Press Releases List of Authors Chris Purdef • What’s Up With FYROM? • Ethnic Macedonian’s Should Stop Negotiating with Greece • Recent Church TOMOS hits Orthodox Faithful in the Soul • MOYANA Meets with US State Dept. Office of Religious Freedom • Why are some Serbian Episcopes in Macedonia twittering List of Authors Liljana Ristova • Interview with Mr. Stojko Stojkov, Co-President of the Five Member Executiveof the OMO Pirin Political Party in Pirin Macedonia • Egej, Our Never-Ending Ache • The Macedonian Heart Still Bleeds in Zhelevo • Skopje: A Divided City, or the European Beirut? • Scott Taylor on the Balkans Part I • Scott Taylor on the Balkans Part II • Interview with Mr. Jordan Kostadinov Ivanov • Interview with Professor Vanche Stojchev • Gala Raises $1.3 Million for Scholarships and CMP • Ancient Macedonian words in the Modern Macedonian Language List of Authors Andrew Rossos • The British Foreign Office and Macedonian National Identity, 1918-1941 List of Authors Carl Savich • Archive at Serbiann.com • Tetovo and Greater Albania: Tetovo During World War II, 1941-1944 • The Role of the Western Media in the Macedonian Conflict • An Analysis of the CNN/NPR Adona/Anne Frank of Kosovo Propaganda Campaign • The Holocaust in Macedonia, 1941-1945 • Consensual Paranoia: The War Against Terrorism, McCarthyism, and the Case of US Air Force Lieutenant Milo Radulovich • The Trial of the Century: The ICTY Trial of Slobodan Milosevic • Lynching or Justice? The Trial of the Century: Kosovo Phase Analysis • Genocide or a Hoax? The Trepca Crematoria Case • The Systematic Destruction of Orthodox Christian Churches and Cemeteries in Kosovo-Metohija and Macedonia • Regime Change: Is This a New Policy? • Freedom of Speech: Evolution and Development • Nationalism and War List of Authors Galina Schneider • Why Punish Macedonia? • Greeks Take Over Western Policy Center List of Authors Michael Seraphinoff • Confronting Ethnic Cleansing in Tetovo, Macedonia • Letter to Senator Murray • Letter to the Illinois Senate • Dr. Seraphinoff on a Policy Document by Dr. Meyer • Dr. Meyer, Responds • Dr. Seraphinoff Replies • Macedonian Gold – The Novel (article by Risto Stefov) • Letter to Congressman John Conyers List of Authors Risto Sidiropoulos • European Court of Human Rights Case of Sidiropoulos and Others v. Greece List of Authors Dushan Sinadinoski • 1947 UN Commision Established the Existence of the Macedonian Minority in Greece List of Authors Joseph Skulj • Origin of the Slavs List of Authors Ireneusz Slupkov • The Communist Party of Greece and the Macedonian National Problem (1918-1940) List of Authors Nikola Spasikov • Etymology of the Word «Macedon» • Gatanka (Puzzle)! • Elendzija • Mysteries in the Balkans List of Authors Tomáš Spevák • A new theory about the Trojan era • The Kievans and the Past of Europe List of Authors Boris Stankov • Case of Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria List of Authors Risto Stefov • Declaration on Behalf of All Macedonians • Macedonia v. Greece: The Truth Behind the Name Dispute • A Nation Divided: The Plight of the Macedonian People • Life in the Greek Concentration Camps: Nikola’s Story • Macedonians: Aggressors or Victims? • The Character Assassination of Father Tsarknias • Historical Feuds or a Ruse to Side-Step Human Rights Issues • Response to Greek Press Release on Macedonia’s Name • 100th Anniversary of the Ilinden Uprising – 1903-2003 • Response to the Pan-Macedonian Association • Letter to President Bush • Article by Robin Lane Fox Misleading • Macedonian Gold – The Novel (article by Risto Stefov) • I Think Therefore I Am • Evidence of the Existence of Macedonians Throughout the Ages • Georgi Donevski Visits the Macedonian Community in Toronto • Oh how the Mighty Have Fallen! • Another Perspective on the Origin of the Slavs • Are Macedonians Bulgarian or are Bulgarians Macedonian? • No Compromise on the Name Macedonia • My Name is Sotir, A Memoir, “The Turning Point” by Olga Lexovska Naumoff • Greece – The Bully of the Balkans • Honouring Dr. Kosta Peev • Lerinsko Oro 2004 • Lerinsko Oro 2006: Best ORO Since Vaska Ilieva • About the Macedonian Language Primer the «Abecedar» • The Original «Abecedar» is in Skopje • Homogeneity of the Greek Nation Turned into Myth; the «Abecedar» • Publication of the «Abecedar» is a Result of International Pressure on Greece • The Abecedar Promoted in Solun • Greek by Name • The Contest For Macedonian Identity 1870-1912 (book review) • The Forced Homogenization of Populations in Greek Macedonia Macedonian Struggle for Independence • Part I – Introduction • Macedonian Struggle Part 2 • Macedonian Struggle Part 3 • Macedonian Struggle Part 4 • Macedonian Struggle Part 5 • Macedonian Struggle Part 6 • Macedonian Struggle Part 7 • Macedonian Struggle Part 8 • Macedonian Struggle Part 9 What Went Wrong in the Last 200 Years • Part I – 1800 – 1878 • Part II – 1878 – 1903 • Part III – Before 1903 • Part IV – The 1903 Ilinden Aftermath • Part V – The Young Turk Uprising & Balkan Wars • Part VI – 1912 – 1939 • Part VII – 1939 – 1949 • Part VIII – The Plight of the Refugee Children • Part IX – Conclusion • Download the Complete Series as a .pdf – History of the Macedonian People • History of the Macedonian People – Softcover Publication • History of the Macedonian People – Part I • History of the Macedonian People – Part II • History of the Macedonian People – Part III • History of the Macedonian People – Part IV • History of the Macedonian People – Part V • History of the Macedonian People – Part VI • History of the Macedonian People – Part VII • History of the Macedonian People – Part VIII • History of the Macedonian People – Part IX • History of the Macedonian People – Part X • History of the Macedonian People – Part XI • History of the Macedonian People – Part XII • History of the Macedonian People – Part XIII • History of the Macedonian People – Part XIV • History of the Macedonian People – Part XV • History of the Macedonian People – Part XVI • History of the Macedonian People – Part XVII • History of the Macedonian People – Part XVIII • History of the Macedonian People – Part XIX Chronicles of Oshchima • Chronicles of the Oshchima Book – Part I • Chronicles of the Oshchima Book – Part II • Chronicles of the Oshchima Book – Part III • Chronicles of the Oshchima Book – Part IV • Chronicles of the Oshchima Book – Part V • Chronicles of the Oshchima Book – Part VI • Chronicles of the Oshchima Book – Part VII • Chronicles of the Oshchima Book – Part VIII • Chronicles of the Oshchima Book – Part IX • Chronicles of the Oshchima Book – Part X Paris Peace Talks of 1919 • Part I – Insight into the Creation of Greece and Albania • Part 2 – The End of the Ottomans • Part 3 – Independent Macedonia Proposals Big Greek Lies • Big Greek Lie #1 • Big Greek Lie #2 • Big Greek Lie #3 • Big Greek Lie #4 • Big Greek Lie #5 • Big Greek Lie #6 • Big Greek Lie #7 • Big Greek Lie #8 • Big Greek Lie #9 • Big Greek Lie #10 • Big Greek Lie #11 • Big Greek Lie #12 • Big Greek Lie #13 • Big Greek Lie #14 • Big Greek Lie #15 • Big Greek Lie #16 • Big Greek Lie #17 • Big Greek Lie #18 • Big Greek Lie #19 • Big Greek Lie #20 Greek Atrocities in Macedonia • Greek Atrocities in Macedonia – Part 1 • Greek Atrocities in Macedonia – Part 2 • Greek Atrocities in Macedonia – Part 3 • Greek Atrocities in Macedonia – Part 4 • Greek Atrocities in Macedonia – Part 5 • Greek Atrocities in Macedonia – Part 6 • The Future of the Macedonian Nation • Only in Greece is a Lie the Truth and the Truth a Lie • The Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization (IMRO) The Macedonians in Greece • Macedonians in Greece – Part 1 • Macedonians in Greece – Part 2 • Macedonians in Greece – Part 3 • Macedonians in Greece – Part 4 • Macedonians in Greece – Part 5 • Macedonians in Greece – Part 6 • Macedonians in Greece – Part 7 • Macedonians in Greece – Part 8 Recovering Macedonia • Recovering Macedonia: Dialogue • Recovering Macedonia – Part 1 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 2 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 3 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 4 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 5 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 6 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 7 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 8 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 9 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 10 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 11 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 12 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 13 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 14 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 15 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 16 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 17 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 18 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 19 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 20 • Recovering Macedonia – Part 21 Macedonian Digest • The Macedonian Digest #1 • The Macedonian Digest #2 • The Macedonian Digest #3 • The Macedonian Digest #4 • The Macedonian Digest #5 • The Macedonian Digest #6 • The Macedonian Digest #7 • The Macedonian Digest #8 • The Macedonian Digest #9 • The Macedonian Digest #10 • The Macedonian Digest #11 • The Macedonian Digest #12 • The Macedonian Digest #13 • The Macedonian Digest #14 • The Macedonian Digest #15 • The Macedonian Digest #16 • The Macedonian Digest #17 • The Macedonian Digest #18 • The Macedonian Digest #19 • The Macedonian Digest #20 • The Macedonian Digest #21 • The Macedonian Digest #22 • The Macedonian Digest #23 • The Macedonian Digest #24 • The Macedonian Digest #25 • The Macedonian Digest #26 • The Macedonian Digest #27 • The Macedonian Digest #28 • The Macedonian Digest #29 • The Macedonian Digest #30 • The Macedonian Digest #31 • The Macedonian Digest #32 • The Macedonian Digest #33 Greece, Bulgaria and the Macedonian Question • Greece, Bulgaria and the Macedonian Question Roman Maps • Roman Maps on the Coliseum List of Authors Jewel Stoyan • My First Visit to Macedonia, or Jewels Memory of Zhelevo List of Authors Lazar Temelko • Lazar Temelko of Sveta Petka • A Soldier Lost – Lazar Temelkov’s Story • Macedonian Translation List of Authors Nikodim Tsarknias • Greek Daily Slanders Macedonian Priest • The Character Assassination of Father Tsarknias • Hardavellas and Company List of Authors United Nations • Security Council, Condemns Violence by Ethnic Albanian Extremists in Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia • Security Council Condemns Extremist Violence, Terrorist Activities in Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Southern Serbia – Resolution 1345 • Security Council Again Rejects Violence in Pursuit of Political Aims – Resolution 1371 List of Authors Sasha Uzunov • The Battle of Srem: The Controversy That Won’t Die • Chento Versus Kolishevski: Battle Over History • Ex-Minister Still Quiet About Plot to Kill Him • After Trajkovski, Where to Next for Macedonia? • Ex-Macedonian Diplomat Reveals Who Caused Delays in Recognition • Trouble Brewing in Macedonia • The Value of Good Public Relations • The 1992 Plan for War in Macedonia • Lessons From the Yugoslav Collapse List of Authors Sam Vaknin • Inside, Outside Diasporas and Modern States • Things You Should Know About The Current Conflict In Macedonia • Macedonia Looks Ahead • Monitoring Macedonia • The Second Coming in Albania • Macedonia’s Augean Stables List of Authors Tom Vangelovski • Appeal to the Patriarch of Antioch and Syria • Strategic Policies and Objectives • The Political Machinations of the Serbian Church • A Potential Strategy – Name Recognition through Human Rights Demands for the Macedonians from Aegean Macedonia • Tolerance • Australia’s Human Rights Party and the Rights of Macedonians

Η «ΑΓΙΑ ΟΙΚΟΓΕΝΕΙΑ» ΤΩΝ ΟΜΟΦΥΛΛΩΝ ΠΡΟΤΥΠΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΟΙ ΚΛΩΝΟΙ ΤΗΣ

«Ξέρω πως ποτέ δε σημαδεύουνε στα πόδια
Στο μυαλό είναι ο Στόχος,
το νου σου ε;»

ΚΑΤΕΡΙΝΑ ΓΩΓΟΥ

 

ΟΙ ΠΡΟΣΦΑΤΟΙ «ΓΑΜΟΙ» ΤΩΝ ΟΜΟΦΥΛΛΩΝ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ

ΑΛΛΑ ΚΑΙ ΓΕΝΙΚΩΤΕΡΑ ΣΕ ΟΛΟ ΤΟΝ ΠΛΑΝΗΤΗ ΣΗΜΑΤΟΔΟΤΟΥΝ

ΤΗΝ ΚΑΤΑΡΓΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΠΡΟΤΥΠΗΣ ΟΙΚΟΓΕΝΕΙΑΣ

ΠΟΥ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙΤΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΕΤΕΡΟΦΥΛΛΟΥΣ

-ΑΝΔΡΑ,ΓΥΝΑΙΚΑ-

ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΟΠΕΙΡΑ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΙΑΣ ΕΝΟΣ ΝΕΟΥ ΠΡΟΤΥΠΟΥ

-ΑΝΔΡΑ,ΑΝΔΡΑ ΚΑΙ ΓΥΝΑΙΚΑΣ,ΓΥΝΑΙΚΑΣ.

ΟΙ ΣΥΝΕΠΕΙΕΣ ΕΝΟΣ ΤΕΤΟΙΟΥ ΑΦΥΣΙΚΟΥ ΠΡΟΤΥΠΟΥ

ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΟΥΝ

ΤΙΣ ΠΡΟΥΠΟΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ:

 ΣΤΑΜΑΤΗΜΑ

ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΑΡΑΓΩΓΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΟΥ ΕΙΔΟΥΣ  ΜΑΚΡΟΧΡΟΝΙΑ.

Η ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΕΙΑ ΝΟΜΙΜΟΠΟΙΗΣΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΥΙΟΘΕΣΙΑΣ ΠΑΙΔΙΩΝ

ΑΠΟ ΤΕΤΟΙΟΥ ΕΙΔΟΥΣ ΑΦΥΣΙΚΑ ΠΡΟΤΥΠΑ

ΣΥΝΕΠΑΓΕΤΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΜΕΤΑΤΡΟΠΗ ΤΩΝ ΥΙΟΘΕΤΗΜΕΝΩΝ ΠΑΙΔΙΩΝ

ΣΕ ΓΕΝΙΤΣΑΡΟΥΣ ΤΟΥ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΟΥ ΕΙΔΟΥΣ

ΔΙΟΤΙ ΤΑ ΠΑΙΔΙΑ ΔΕΝ ΘΑ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΔΥΝΑΤΟΤΗΤΑ ΝΑ ΠΑΓΙΩΣΟΥΝ ΤΙΣ

ΕΤΕΡΟΦΥΛΛΕΣ ΣΧΕΣΕΙΣ.

ΤΙΣ ΕΝΝΟΙΕΣ ΤΟΥ ΑΡΣΕΝΙΚΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥ ΘΗΛΥΚΟΥ

ΟΤΑΝ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΑΤΡΟΦΗ ΤΟΥΣ ΘΑ ΦΡΟΝΤΙΖΟΥΝ

 ΔΥΟ ΑΝΔΡΕΣ Η ΔΥΟ ΓΥΝΑΙΚΕΣ.

ΑΥΤΟ ΘΑ ΣΥΜΒΕΙ ΔΙΟΤΙ ΤΑ ΠΑΙΔΙΑ ΑΠΟ ΜΙΚΡΑ ΘΑ ΠΑΓΙΩΝΟΥΝ

ΤΟ ΠΡΟΤΥΠΟ ΤΗΣ ΚΛΩΝΟΠΟΙΗΜΕΝΗΣ ΜΟΝΑΔΑΣ 

ΚΑΙ

ΟΧΙ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΤΥΠΟ ΤΗΣ ΜΟΝΑΔΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΜΟΝΑΔΑΣ.

ΟΥΣΙΑΣΤΙΚΑ ΕΑΝ Η ΤΑΣΗ ΑΥΤΗ ΤΗΣ ΟΜΟΦΥΛΛΟΦΥΛΙΚΗΣ ΣΥΜΒΙΩΣΗΣ ΕΠΙΚΡΑΤΗΣΕΙ ΜΑΚΡΟΧΡΟΝΙΑ ΤΟ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΟ ΓΕΝΟΣ

ΘΑ ΠΑΨΕΙ ΝΑ ΑΝΑΠΑΡΑΓΕΤΑΙ.

ΤΗΝ ΛΥΣΗ ΟΜΩΣ ΤΗΝ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΒΡΕΙ ΗΔΗ.

ΤΑ ΠΕΙΡΑΜΑΤΑ ΚΛΩΝΟΠΟΙΗΣΗΣ ΖΩΩΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΟ ΠΡΩΤΟ ΣΤΑΔΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΚΛΩΝΟΠΟΙΗΣΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΩΝ.

ΕΠΟΜΕΝΩΣ ΔΕΝ ΧΡΕΙΑΖΕΤΑΙ ΠΙΑ ΤΟ ΑΡΣΕΝΙΚΟ ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΘΗΛΥΚΟ ΓΙΑ ΑΝΑΠΑΡΑΓΩΓΗ.

Η ΑΝΑΠΑΡΑΓΩΓΗ ΘΑ ΓΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΔΙΑ ΚΛΩΝΟΠΟΙΗΣΕΩΣ.

Η ΟΛΗ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΑ ΕΝΤΑΣΣΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΟ ΣΧΕΔΙΑΣΜΟ

ΜΙΑ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΑΣ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΗΣ,

ΜΙΑΣ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΑΣ ΘΡΗΣΚΕΙΑΣ,

ΕΝΟΣ ΕΙΔΟΥΣ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΥ

-ΟΥΤΕ ΑΡΣΕΝΙΚΟΥ , ΟΥΤΕ ΘΗΛΥΚΟΥ.

ΓΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΑΠΟΠΕΙΡΑ ΝΑ ΚΑΤΑΡΓΗΘΕΙ Η ΘΕΩΡΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΘΕΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΤΙΘΕΣΗΣ,ΤΗΣ ΔΡΑΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΤΙΔΡΑΣΗΣ, ΤΟΥ ΘΕΤΙΚΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥ ΑΡΝΗΤΙΚΟΥ ΚΛΠ

ΕΝΝΟΙΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΚΑΘΟΡΙΖΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΑΛΛΗΛΟΥΧΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΦΥΣΗΣ

ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΔΙΑΡΚΗ ΚΙΝΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ.

Η ΑΡΝΗΣΗ ΑΥΤΗ ΘΑ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΗΣΕΙ ΤΙΣ ΠΡΟΥΠΟΘΕΣΕΙΣ

ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΖΩΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΗΣ ΝΟΗΜΟΣΥΝΗΣ

ΚΑΙ

ΤΗΝ ΕΠΙΒΟΛΗ ΠΛΗΡΟΥΣ ΝΟΗΤΙΚΟΥ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ

ΣΤΟ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΟ ΕΙΔΟΣ.

 

ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΚΑΘΗΓΗΤΗ ΣΤΟ ΕΠΙΛΟΧΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΤΑ… ΣΤΟΝ ΕΡΓΟΔΟΤΗ

ΑΝ ΒΡΕΘΕΙ ΔΟΥΛΕΙΑ!!

ΤΟ ΖΗΤΗΜΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΘΝΙΚΗΣ ΑΜΥΝΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΘΕΜΕΛΙΩΔΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΣΗΜΑΝΤΙΚΟ ΖΗΤΟΥΜΕΝΟ ΣΤΗΝ ΣΗΜΕΡΙΝΗ ΣΥΓΚΥΡΙΑ.

ΟΜΩΣ ΑΠΕΧΕΙ ΠΟΛΥ Η ΥΠΟΧΡΕΩΤΙΚΗ ΣΤΡΑΤΕΥΣΗ ΑΜΕΣΩΣ ΜΕΤΑ ΤΟ ΛΥΚΕΙΟ ΜΕ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΣΧΗΜΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΞΑΛΕΙΨΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΡΟΥΣΦΕΤΙΟΥ

ΚΑΙ

Η ΑΝΑΔΙΑΡΘΡΩΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΕΝΟΠΛΩΝ ΔΥΝΑΜΕΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ ΜΕ ΒΑΣΗ ΤΑ ΕΘΝΙΚΑ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΜΦΕΡΟΝΤΑ.

Η ΑΠΟΠΕΙΡΑ ΠΟΥ ΓΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΥΣ ΚΑΘ’ ΕΞΙΝ ΡΟΥΣΦΕΤΟΛΟΓΟΥΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΝΔ ΝΑ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΛΟΓΗΣΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΙΑ ΡΟΜΠΟΤΑΝΘΡΩΠΩΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΝ ΜΗ ΤΙ ΑΛΛΟ ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΗ.

ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΟΥΝ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΧΟΥΝΤΙΚΗ ΜΕΘΟΔΟ ΤΗΣ ΥΠΟΧΡΕΩΤΙΚΗΣ ΣΤΡΑΤΕΥΣΗΣ ΝΑ ΑΠΟΡΡΟΦΗΣΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΕΡΓΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΝΕΩΝ, ΤΗΝ ΑΝΤΙΔΡΑΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΝΕΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΤΕΛΙΚΑ ΝΑ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΗΣΟΥΝ ΟΝΤΑ ΥΠΟΤΑΓΜΕΝΑ ΣΤΟ ΙΕΡΑΡΧΙΚΟ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ ΤΟΥ ΣΥΓΧΡΟΝΟΥ ΚΑΠΙΤΑΛΙΣΜΟΥ.

Ο ΝΕΟΣ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΜΑΘΕΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΓΕΝΝΟΦΑΣΚΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΝΑ ΥΠΟΤΑΣΣΕΤΑΙ, ΝΑ ΥΠΟΚΥΠΤΕΙ ΣΤΙΣ ΕΝΤΟΛΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΡΧΙΑΣ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΜΗΝ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΕΙ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ ΣΤΟ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ ΠΑΡΑΓΩΓΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΕΚΜΕΤΑΛΛΕΥΣΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΙΝΟΥ ΔΥΝΑΜΙΚΟΥ.

ΟΙ ΕΡΓΟΔΟΤΕΣ ΘΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΜΗΝ ΑΝΤΙΜΕΤΩΠΙΖΟΥΝ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ ΜΕ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΡΓΑΖΟΜΕΝΟΥΣ.

ΚΑΙ ΟΙ ΕΡΓΑΖΟΜΕΝΟΙ ΘΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΕΤΣΙ ΦΤΙΑΓΜΕΝΟΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ ΠΟΥ ΝΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΑ ΡΟΜΠΟΤΑΚΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΟΣ.

ΕΝΑ ΜΕΓΑΛΟ ΕΥΓΕ ΣΤΟΥΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΝΔ ΠΟΥ ΑΠΟΔΕΧΟΝΤΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΡΟΜΠΟΤΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΣ ΝΕΟΛΑΙΑΣ!!

ΑΝΤΙ ΝΑ ΠΡΟΧΩΡΗΣΟΥΝ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΓΚΣΥΧΡΟΝΙΣΜΟ ΤΩΝ ΕΝΟΠΛΩΝ ΔΥΝΑΜΕΩΝ -ΧΩΡΙΣ ΜΙΖΕΣ- ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΙΑ ΑΞΙΟΚΡΑΤΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΟΣ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΑΣ ΤΟΥ.

Η ΚΑΤΑΡΓΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΑΣ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗΣ ΣΤΙΣ ΗΠΑ

Η ΚΑΤΑΡΓΗΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΧΕΙΡΑΓΩΓΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΑΣ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗΣ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΦΡΟΥΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΕΥΔΟΚΙΜΕΙ ΜΟΝΟΝ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΙΚΗ ΕΝΩΣΗ.

ΟΙ ΗΝΩΜΕΝΕΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΕΙΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗΣ ΚΑΤΕΧΟΥΝ ΤΑ ΠΡΩΤΕΙΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΚΑΤΑΡΓΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΑΣ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗΣ ΜΕ ΟΤΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΣΥΝΕΠΑΓΕΤΑΙ.

Ο ΔΙΟΓΕΝΗΣ ΘΕΩΡΟΥΣΕ ΟΤΙ Η ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑ, Η ΜΟΡΦΩΣΗ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙ «ΤΟ ΘΕΜΕΛΙΟ ΚΑΘΕ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΑΣ»

Ο ΜΕΤΑΡΡΥΘΜΙΣΤΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ «ΠΑΤΕΡΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΙΚΗΣ ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑΣ» HORACE MANN ΠΗΓΑΙΝΕ ΠΙΟ ΜΑΚΡΙΑ.

ΕΛΕΓΕ ΟΤΙ » ΤΟ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΟ ΣΧΟΛΕΙΟ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΜΕΓΑΛΥΤΕΡΗ ΑΝΑΚΑΛΥΨΗ ΤΟΥ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΥ».

ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΤΟΣΟ ΣΤΙΣ ΗΠΑ ΟΣΟ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΗ/ΕΛΛΑΔΑ Η ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΕΙΑ ΚΑΤΑΡΓΗΣΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΑΣ ΓΙΑ ΟΛΟΥΣ ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΣ.

ΔΙΑΒΑΣΤΕ ΤΟ ΣΧΕΤΙΚΟ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΤΑΡΓΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΑΣ ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑΣ ΣΤΙΣ ΗΠΑ

ΑΡΘΡΟ

ΤΟΥ Stephen Lendman

ΜΕ ΤΙΤΛΟ

Destroying Public Education in America

ΚΑΙ ΘΑ ΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΕΤΕ

ΤΙ ΕΙΔΟΥΣ ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑ ΕΥΑΓΓΕΛΙΖΟΝΤΑΙ

ΟΙ ΞΥΛΟΣΧΙΣΤΕΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΙ ΜΑΣ

ΜΑΖΙ

ΜΕ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΔΗΦΑΓΟΥΣ ΜΕΓΑΛΟΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΙΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΙΣ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΕΣ

ΚΑΙ ΤΑ ΠΑΣΗΣ ΦΥΣΕΩΣ ΕΥΑΓΗ ΙΔΡΥΜΑΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΥΣ.