ΝΕΑ ΧΩΡΙΣ ΦΙΛΤΡΟ ΦΕΛΛΟΥ

Νέα και Παράξενα-Σελίδες εναλλακτικής πληροφόρησης και ειδήσεων-alternative informations

Posts Tagged ‘Αναρχικοί’

Ο David de Rothschild ΗΡΘΕ ΚΑΙ ΜΙΛΗΣΕ,Ο Paul R. Krugman ΗΡΘΕ ΚΑΙ ΜΙΛΗΣΕ ΚΑΙ Η ΛΕΣΧΗ ΜΠΙΛΝΤΕΡΜΠΕΡΓΚ ΘΑΡΘΕΙ ΤΟΝ ΜΑΙΟ

Posted by satyrikon στο Μαρτίου 19, 2009

Ο ΜΕΓΑΛΟΣΧΗΜΟΣ ΒΑΡΩΝΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΚΑΛΟΣ ΟΙΚΟΓΕΝΕΙΑΡΧΗΣ ΡΟΤΣΙΛΝΤ ΚΑΘΩΣ ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ Ο ΝΟΜΠΕΛΙΣΤΑΣ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΟΛΟΓΟΣ, (LIBERAL,ΗΤΟΙ ΑΡΙΣΤΕΡΟΣ)  ΚΡΟΥΓΚΜΑΝ ΗΡΘΑΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΞΕΦΡΑΣΑΝ ΤΙΣ ΑΠΟΨΕΙΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΑ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΚΡΙΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΚΡΙΣΗ.

ΣΥΝΑΝΤΗΘΗΚΑΝ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΚΩΣΤΑ ΚΑΡΑΜΑΝΛΗ  ΚΑΙ ΕΙΠΑΝ …. ΤΙ ΑΡΑΓΕ ΕΙΠΑΝ?

ΓΙΑΤΙ ΑΡΑΓΕ ΗΡΘΕ Ο ΡΟΤΣΙΛΝΤ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ? ΝΑ ΜΑΣ ΠΕΙ ΤΙ?

ΒΕΒΑΙΑ Ο ΚΩΣΤΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΛΦΑ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΑΣ «Υπενθύμισε δε στους παρευρισκομένους στην αίθουσα ότι ο βρετανικός κλάδος του ομίλου Ρότσιλντ χορήγησε στην Ελλάδα το πρώτο δάνειο που έλαβε ως ανεξάρτητο κράτος το 1833, ύψους 2.343.752 λιρών. «.

ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΤΕ ΠΛΗΡΩΝΟΥΜΕ ΤΑ ΔΑΝΕΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΑΓΓΛΙΑΣ ΠΟΥ ΔΕΝ ΤΕΛΕΙΩΝΟΥΝ ΠΟΤΕ.

ΗΡΘΕ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΜΑΣ ΞΑΝΑΔΑΝΕΙΣΕΙ?

Ο ΑΛΛΟΣ ΜΕΓΑΣ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΟΛΟΓΟΣ ΚΡΟΥΚΓΜΑΝ Ο ΥΠΟΣΤΗΡΙΖΩΝ ΤΗΝ ΜΕΡΙΚΗ ΕΘΝΙΚΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΩΝ ΜΑΣ ΕΙΠΕ ΟΤΙ ΜΕ ΜΑΓΕΙΡΕΜΕΝΑ ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΑ ΜΠΗΚΑΜΕ ΣΤΗΝ ΖΩΝΗ ΤΟΥ ΕΥΡΩ.

ΑΝΤΕ ΜΕΓΑΛΕ ΝΟΜΠΕΛΙΣΤΑ, ΝΑ ΤΙΣ ΑΓΟΡΑΣΟΥΜΕ ΜΕ ΤΑ ΛΕΦΤΟΥΔΑΚΙΑ ΜΑΣ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΤΙΣ ΞΑΝΑΠΟΥΛΗΣΟΥΜΕ ΜΕΤΑ!!!

ΝΑ ΠΛΗΡΩΣΟΥΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΖΗΜΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΟΙ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΙΤΕΣ ΝΑ ΠΑΡΟΥΝ ΤΑ ΚΕΡΔΗ !!

ΣΗΜΕΙΩΣΤΕ ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΚΟΣΤΟΣ ΣΥΜΜΕΤΟΧΗΣ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΜΑΣ ΠΕΙ ΤΙΣ ΣΟΦΙΕΣ ΤΟΥ

ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟΣ ΤΑ ΚΟΥΒΕΝΤΙΑΣΕ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΚΑΡΑΜΑΝΛΗ ΔΙΟΤΙ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΛΟΣ ΤΩΝ :

Paul R. Krugman current relationships:

ΟΠΟΥ ΤΟ Group of Thirty:

The current members of the Group of Thirty are:

  • Paul Volcker – Chairman of the Board of Trustees; former Chairman of the Federal Reserve
  • Jacob A. Frenkel – Chairman; Vice Chairman, American International Group
  • Geoffrey L. Bell – Executive Secretary; President Geoffrey Bell and Company
  • Leszek Balcerowicz – Former President, National Bank of Poland
  • Jaime Caruana – Counselor and Director, MCM Department, International Monetary Fund
  • Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. – Chief Executive, TIAA-CREF
  • Stanley Fischer – Governor, Bank of Israel
  • Mervyn Allister King – Governor of the Bank of England
  • Guillermo Ortiz Martinez – Governor, Banco de México
  • Jean-Claude Trichet – President, European Central Bank
  • Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa – Minister of Economy and Finance, Italy
  • Zhou Xiaochuan – Governor, People’s Bank of China
  • Yutaka Yamaguchi – Former Deputy Governor, Bank of Japan
  • E. Gerald Corrigan – Managing Director, Goldman Sachs, former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
  • Andrew Crockett – President, JP Morgan Chase
  • Sir David Walker – Senior Advisor Morgan Stanley
  • Guillermo de la Dehesa – Director and Member of the Executive Committee, Grupo Santander
  • Arminio Fraga Neto – Partner, Gávea Investimentos
  • Domingo Cavallo – Chairman and CEO, DFC Associates, LLC
  • Martin Feldstein – President, National Bureau of Economic Research
  • Paul Krugman – Professor of Economics, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University
  • Lawrence Summers – Charles W. Eliot University Professor, Harvard University
  • Ernesto Zedillo, Director, Yale Center for the Study of Globalization, Yale University, and former President of Mexico
  • Gerd Häusler – Vice-Chairman Lazard International
  • Abdulatif Al-Hamad – Chairman, Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development
  • Montek Singh Ahluwalia – Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission, India
  • Mario Draghi – Governor, Bank of Italy
  • Philipp Hildebrand, Vice-Chairman, Swiss National Bank
  • Kenneth Rogoff, Professor University of Princeton]]
  • Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Minister of Finance, Singapore]]
  • Tim Geithner, Current United States Secretary of the Treasury

Η ΑΔΕΔΥ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΣΕΙΡΑ ΤΗΣ ΛΕΕΙ:«Η ουσιαστική κατάργηση της εισοδηματική πολιτικής στην οποία προέβη η κυβέρνηση, επιβεβαιώνει ότι η χώρα βρίσκεται σε πτώχευση κάτι που επιμελώς, αλλά ανεπιτυχώς αποκρύβεται» τονίζει και σοκάρει ο πρόεδρος της ΑΔΕΔΥ Σπ.Παπασπύρος προσθέτοντας ότι εν μέσω κρίσης τα εισοδήματα εργαζομένων και συνταξιούχων βυθίζονται ακόμη περισσότερο.

ΤΟ ΜΑΙΟ ΟΠΩΣ ΜΑΣ ΕΝΗΜΕΡΩΝΕΙ Ο «ΒΗΜΑΤΟΔΟΤΗΣ» ΘΑ ΓΙΝΕΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ Η ΜΑΖΩΞΗ ΤΩΝ ΜΠΙΛΝΤΕΡΜΠΕΡΓΚΑΙΩΝ ΓΙΑΤΙ ΜΠΑΙΝΕΙ ΚΑΙ Η ΑΝΟΙΞΗ.

ΣΑΝ ΠΟΛΛΟΙ ΔΕΝ ΜΑΖΕΥΟΝΤΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΜΙΚΡΗ ΕΛΛΑΔΙΤΣΑ.

ΠΟΛΛΕΣ ΕΠΙΣΚΕΨΕΙΣ ΡΕ ΠΑΙΔΙ ΜΟΥ.

ΚΑΙ ΜΑΛΛΟΝ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΓΙΑ ΚΑΛΟ!!!

ΒΕΒΑΙΑ ΕΧΕΙ ΠΕΣΕΙ ΜΟΥΓΚΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΣΤΡΟΥΓΚΑ ΤΩΝ ΜΜΕ ΚΑΙ ΟΛΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΩΝ ΚΟΜΜΑΤΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ.

ΗΡΘΕ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ Ο ΑΡΧΗΓΟΣ ΤΩΝ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΙΤΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΔΕΝ ΑΝΟΙΞΕ ΜΥΤΗ.

ΠΟΥΝΑΙ ΤΟ ΠΑΣΟΚ, Ο ΣΥΡΙΖΑΣ,ΤΟ ΚΚΕ ΚΑΙ ΟΛΕΣ ΟΙ ΑΡΙΣΤΕΡΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΔΕΞΙΕΣ ΣΕΧΤΕΣ ΜΕ ΤΑ ΚΑΛΑΖΝΙΚΩΦ ΚΑΙ ΤΙΣ ΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΤΟ ΜΟΝΟ ΠΟΥ ΜΠΟΡΟΥΝ ΑΝΕΞΟΔΑ ΝΑ ΚΑΝΟΥΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΝΑ ΠΥΡΟΒΟΛΟΥΝ ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΚΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΣΠΑΝΕ ΤΑ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑΤΑ.

ΟΜΟΡΦΟΣ ΚΟΣΜΟΣ ΑΓΩΝΙΣΤΙΚΟΣ ΛΑΙΚΑ ΠΛΑΣΜΕΝΟΣ.

Posted in Bilderberg, Κ.Καραμανλής, ΚΚΕ, Μπιλντερμπέργκ, ΝΕΑ ΕΠΟΧΗ, NEW AGE, Rothschilds, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Σχόλια »

INDYMEDIA ΚΑΙ Η ΕΠΤΑΦΩΤΟΣ ΛΥΧΝΙΑ (ΜΕΝΟΡΑΧ)

Posted by satyrikon στο Μαρτίου 16, 2009

ΑΥΤΟ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΟ ΛΟΓΟΤΥΠΟ ΤΟΥ

INDYMEDIA

920804imclogo2ΚΑΙ

ΑΥΤΟ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΟ

ΕΜΒΛΗΜΑ ΤΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ ΤΟΥ ΙΣΡΑΗΛ

418px-coat_of_arms_of_israelsvg

ΗΤΟΙ

Η ΛΕΓΟΜΕΝΗ ΕΠΤΑΦΩΤΟΣ ΛΥΧΝΙΑ

-ΜΕΝΟΡΑΧ(MENORAH)

yarmulkeandmenorah

ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΟ

«radio tower symbol”

radio tower symbol”

radio tower symbol”

Posted in Ισραήλ, ΜΚΟ, ΝΕΑ ΕΠΟΧΗ, NEW AGE, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 35 Σχόλια »

ΣΤΕΚΙ ΑΛΒΑΝΩΝ ΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΩΝ:Αυτές οι μέρες είναι και δικές μας…18 χρόνια βουβής οργής είναι πολλά

Posted by satyrikon στο Δεκέμβριος 23, 2008

ΤΟ ΠΑΡΑΚΑΤΩ ΚΕΙΜΕΝΟ

ΑΝΑΠΑΡΑΓΕΤΑΙ ΣΕ ΠΟΛΛΑ ΜΠΛΟΓΚΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙ ΜΙΑ ΑΠΤΗ

ΑΠΟΔΕΙΞΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΜΑΣ ΟΔΗΓΗΣΕ Η ΑΦΡΩΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΤΩΝ «ΕΛΛΗΝΩΝ» ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΩΝ.

ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΕΔΩ ΥΠΑΡΧΕΙ ΜΙΑ ΛΙΣΤΑ ΑΠΟ ΔΙΕΥΘΥΝΣΕΙΣ ΜΠΛΟΓΚΣ

ΤΑ ΟΠΟΙΑ ΣΕ ΜΕΓΑΛΟ ΒΑΘΜΟ ΑΝΑΠΑΡΑΓΟΥΝ(ΣΑΝ ΑΠΟ ΑΟΡΑΤΟ ΧΕΡΙ) ΣΧΕΔΟΝ ΤΑ ΙΔΙΑ ΚΕΙΜΕΝΑ

ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΚΕΡΑΣΑΚΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΤΟΥΡΤΑ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙ Η ΟΜΑΔΑ TERMINAL 119

ΠΟΥ ΕΙΔΙΚΕΥΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΟΝ ΑΝΤΙΡΑΤΣΙΣΜΟ,ΤΟΝ ΑΝΤΙΣΗΜΙΤΙΣΜΟ ΚΑΙ ΣΕ ΑΛΛΑ ΑΝΤΙ…..

ΑΡΑΓΕ ΠΟΙΑ ΕΝΑΙ Η ΣΧΕΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΑΛΕΞΗ

ΜΕ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΛΒΑΝΟΥΣ ΛΑΘΡΟΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΕΣ

ΚΑΙ ΠΟΙΟΣ ΑΟΡΑΤΟΣ ΕΓΚΕΦΑΛΟΣ

ΤΑ ΣΥΣΧΕΤΙΖΕΙ ΜΕ ΤΡΟΠΟ ΠΟΥ ΠΡΟΣΒΑΛΛΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΜΝΗΜΗ

ΤΟΥ ΔΟΛΟΦΟΝΗΜΕΝΟΥ ΑΛΕΞΗ?

ΤΟ ΚΕΙΜΕΝΟ

[ Δεκέμβριος / 2008]

ΣΤΕΚΙ ΑΛΒΑΝΩΝ ΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΩΝ

Αυτές οι μέρες είναι και δικές μας…

Μετά από τη δολοφονία του Αλέξη Γρηγορόπουλου ζούμε μια πρωτοφανή κατάσταση αναβρασμού, ένα ξεχείλισμα οργής που δεν λέει να σταματήσει. Μπροστάρηδες σε αυτό τον ξεσηκωμό είναι οι μαθητές, οι οποίοι με αστείρευτο πάθος και με ένα πηγαίο αυθορμητισμό έχουν ανατρέψει όλα τα δεδομένα. Δεν μπορείς να σταματήσεις κάτι που δεν ελέγχεις, κάτι που οργανώνεται αυθόρμητα και με όρους που δεν κατανοείς. Αυτή είναι η ομορφιά αυτού του ξεσηκωμού. Οι μαθητές κάνουν ιστορία και αφήνουν τους άλλους να τη εντάξουν ιδεολογικά και να τη γράψουν. Οι δρόμοι, η πρωτοβουλία, το πάθος είναι δικό τους.

Μέσα στα πλαίσια της γενικότερης κινητοποίησης, με ατμομηχανή τα μαθητικά συλλαλητήρια, υπάρχει και μια μαζική συμμετοχή της δεύτερης γενιάς των μεταναστών και αρκετών προσφύγων. Οι πρόσφυγες κατεβαίνουν μεμονωμένα, χωρίς κάποια ιδιαίτερη οργάνωση, με έναν αυθορμητισμό και με μια ορμή που χαρακτηρίζει τις κινητοποιήσεις τους. Αυτοί τη στιγμή είναι το πιο μαχητικό κομμάτι των ξένων στη Ελλάδα. Έτσι και αλλιώς είναι πολύ λίγα αυτά που έχουν να χάσουν.

Τα παιδιά των μεταναστών κινητοποιούνται μαζικά και δυναμικά κυρίως μέσα στα πλαίσια των σχολικών και φοιτητικών δράσεων ή μέσα από τις οργανώσεις της αριστεράς και άκρας αριστεράς. Είναι και το πιο ενταγμένο κομμάτι των μεταναστών, το πιο θαρραλέο. Δεν είναι σαν τους γονείς τους που ήρθαν με σκυμμένο το κεφάλι σαν να ζητιανεύανε ένα κομμάτι ψωμί. Είναι μέρος της ελληνικής κοινωνίας, καθώς δεν γνώρισαν άλλη. Δεν ζητιανεύουν κάτι, διεκδικούν δυναμικά να είναι ισότιμοι με τους έλληνες συμμαθητές τους. Ισότιμοι στα δικαιώματα, στο δρόμο, στα όνειρα.

Για μας τους οργανωμένους μετανάστες είναι ένας δεύτερος γαλλικός Νοέμβρης του 2005. Δεν είχαμε ποτέ αυταπάτες ότι όταν η οργή του κόσμου ξεχείλιζε θα μπορούσαμε να την κατευθύνουμε. Παρά τους αγώνες που έχουμε δώσει όλα αυτά τα χρόνια ποτέ δεν μπορέσαμε να πετύχουμε τέτοιες μαζικές αντιδράσεις. Τώρα είναι η ώρα να μιλήσουν οι δρόμοι. Η κραυγή που ακούγεται είναι για τα 18 χρόνια βίας, καταπίεσης, εκμετάλλευσης, εξευτελισμού. Αυτές οι μέρες είναι και δικές μας.

Αυτές οι μέρες είναι για τους εκατοντάδες μετανάστες και πρόσφυγες δολοφονημένους στα σύνορα, στα τμήματα, στους χώρους εργασίας. Είναι για τους δολοφονημένους από μπάτσους ή αγανακτισμένους πολίτες. Είναι για τους δολοφονημένους επειδή πέρασαν τα σύνορα, επειδή δούλευαν σαν τα σκυλιά, επειδή δεν σκύψανε το κεφάλι, για το τίποτα. Είναι για τον Γκραμόζ Παλούσι, τον Λουάν Μπερντελίμα, τον Εντισόν Γιάχαϊ, τον Τόνυ Ονόυχα, τον Αμπντουρακίμ Ιντρίζ, τον Μοντασέρ Μοχάμεντ Ασράφ και τόσους άλλους που δεν ξεχάσαμε.

Αυτές οι μέρες είναι για την καθημερινή αστυνομική βία που έχει μείνει αναπάντητη, ατιμώρητη. Είναι για τον εξευτελισμό στα σύνορα, στα κέντρα αλλοδαπών που συνεχίζεται ακόμα. Είναι για τις κατάφωρες αποφάσεις των ελληνικών δικαστηρίων, τους μετανάστες και πρόσφυγες που είναι άδικα στις φυλακές, τη δικαιοσύνη που μας στερήθηκε. Ακόμα και τώρα, στις μέρες και νύχτες του ξεσηκωμού, οι μετανάστες πληρώνουν βαρύ τίμημα με επιθέσεις ακροδεξιών και μπάτσων, με απελάσεις και ποινές φυλάκισης που τα δικαστήρια μοιράζουν με χριστιανική αγάπη σε εμάς τους άπιστους.

Αυτές οι μέρες είναι για την εκμετάλλευση που συνεχίζεται αμείωτη για 18 χρόνια. Είναι για τους αγώνες που δεν ξεχάστηκαν στους κάμπους στο Βόλο, τα ολυμπιακά έργα, την Αμαλιάδα. Είναι για τον ιδρώτα και το αίμα των γονιών μας, για τη μαύρη εργασία, τα ατελείωτα ωράρια. Είναι για τα παράβολα, τα πρόστιμα, τα ένσημα που πληρώνουμε και δεν θα μας αναγνωριστούν ποτέ. Είναι για τα χαρτιά που θα κυνηγάμε μια ζωή σαν να είναι λαχείο.

Αυτές οι μέρες είναι για το τίμημα που πληρώνουμε απλά για να υπάρχουμε, να αναπνέουμε. Είναι για όσες φορές σφίξαμε τα δόντια, για τις προσβολές που ανεχτήκαμε, τις ήττες που χρεωθήκαμε. Είναι για όσες φορές δεν αντιδράσαμε ενώ είχαμε όλους τους λόγους του κόσμου. Είναι για όσες φορές αντιδράσαμε και ήμασταν μόνοι γιατί ο θάνατος και η οργή μας δεν χωράγανε σε σχήματα, δεν έφερναν ψήφους, δεν πουλούσαν στα δελτία των 8.

Αυτές οι μέρες είναι όλων των περιθωριακών, των αποκλεισμένων, των ανθρώπων με τα δύσκολα ονόματα και τις άγνωστες ιστορίες. Είναι για όσους πεθαίνουν καθημερινά στο Αιγαίο και στον Έβρο, για όσους δολοφονούνται στα σύνορα ή στην Πέτρου Ράλλη, είναι των τσιγγάνων στο Ζεφύρι, των ναρκομανών στα Εξάρχεια. Αυτές οι μέρες είναι των παιδιών της Μεσολογγίου, των ανένταχτων, των ανεξέλεγκτων μαθητών. Χάρης στον Αλέξη αυτές οι μέρες είναι όλων μας.

18 χρόνια βουβής οργής είναι πολλά.

Όλοι στους δρόμους, για την αλληλεγγύη & την αξιοπρέπεια!

Δεν ξεχάσαμε, δεν ξεχνάμε, αυτές οι μέρες είναι και δικές σας

Για τον Λουάν, τον Τόνυ, τον Μοχάμεντ, τον Αλέξη….

Στέκι Αλβανών Μεταναστών

ΤΟ ΚΕΙΜΕΝΟ ΑΥΤΟ ΜΟΝΟ «ΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΕΣ» ΔΕΝ ΘΑ ΜΠΟΡΟΥΣΑΝ ΝΑ ΤΟ ΓΡΑΨΟΥΝ ΟΠΩΣ ΠΡΟΔΙΔΕΙ Η ΔΟΜΗ ΤΟΥ.

ΚΑΙ ΕΡΧΕΤΑΙ ΤΑΥΤΟΧΡΟΝΑ

ΚΑΙ ΤΟ global lobby group Human Rights Watch

ΠΟΥ ΣΕ ΕΚΘΕΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΚΑΤΗΓΟΡΕΙ

ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΗ

ΓΙΑ ΑΔΥΝΑΜΙΑ ΠΡΟΣΤΑΣΙΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΠΑΙΔΙΩΝ ΤΩΝ «ΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΩΝ»

ΤΙ ΣΥΜΠΤΩΣΗ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΥΤΗ  !!!!

ΔΕΙΤΕ ΤΩΡΑ ΤΙ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΟ

Human Rights Watch

ΑΠΟ ΠΟΥ ΞΕΚΙΝΑΕΙ

seac004ΚΑΙ ΠΟΥ ΚΑΤΑΛΗΓΕΙ

seac003

ΣΤΟΝ GEORGE SOROS

ΚΑΙ

ΣΤΗΝ TRILATERAL TOY ΡΟΚΦΕΛΛΕΡ

ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΑ ΑΝΤΙΚΕΙΜΕΝΙΚΟ ΛΟΜΠΥ!!

Posted in Albania, Bilderberg, Αλβανία, Μπιλντερμπέργκ, Ρατσισμός, NGO, NWO, Soros George, Trilateral Commission, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Σχόλια »

Η ΙΔΕΟΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΑΝΕΠΑΡΚΕΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΤΙΚΗΣ ΔΙΕΘΝΟΥΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΤΙΜΕΤΩΠΙΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΚΗΣ ΚΡΙΣΗΣ

Posted by satyrikon στο Δεκέμβριος 21, 2008

ΕΝΑ ΦΑΝΤΑΣΜΑ ΠΛΑΝΑΤΑΙ ΠΑΝΩ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΗ:

ΤΟ ΦΑΝΤΑΣΜΑ ΤΟΥ ΧΑΟΥΣ.

ΟΙ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΙΟΙ ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΤΕΣ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΑΠΟΤΥΧΕΙ ΝΑ ΑΝΤΙΜΕΤΩΠΙΣΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΚΡΙΣΗ ΛΟΓΩ ΕΣΩΤΕΡΙΚΩΝ ΔΙΑΙΡΕΣΕΩΝ.

ΟΙ ΤΑΡΑΧΕΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΜΠΟΡΕΙ ΝΑ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΠΟΛΛΕΣ ΑΙΤΙΕΣ ΑΛΛΑ ΑΥΤΗ ΠΟΥ ΣΠΑΝΙΑ ΑΝΑΦΕΡΕΤΑΙ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΑΝΕΠΑΡΚΕΙΑ ΚΑΙ Η ΕΣΩΤΕΡΙΚΕΣ ΑΝΤΙΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΤΟΥ ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΤΙΚΟΥ ΠΑΣΟΚ.

ΣΕ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΙΚΟ ΕΠΙΠΕΔΟ ΟΙ ΕΣΩΤΕΡΙΚΕΣ ΑΝΤΙΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΤΩΝ ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΚΟΜΜΑΤΩΝ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΕΠΙΦΕΡΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΡΑΛΥΣΗ ΤΟΥΣ.

ΤΑ ΚΟΜΜΑΤΑ ΑΥΤΑ ΔΕΝ ΚΑΤΑΦΕΡΑΝ ΝΑ ΑΞΙΟΠΟΙΗΣΟΥΝ ΤΗΝ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΚΡΙΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΠΡΟΒΑΛΛΟΥΝ ΣΥΓΚΕΚΡΙΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟΨΕΙΣ ΑΝΤΙΜΕΤΩΠΙΣΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΛΛΑ ΑΝΤΙΘΕΤΑ ΠΑΡΑΜΕΝΟΥΝ ΑΠΑΘΕΙΣ ΘΕΑΤΕΣ ΟΠΟΥ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΝΤΙΠΟΛΙΤΕΥΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΑΝΤΙΠΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΙ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΤΕΣ ΟΠΟΥ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΗ.

ΕΧΟΥΝ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΑΠΟΔΕΧΘΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΗ ΑΓΟΡΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΥΠΟΣΤΗΡΙΖΟΥΝ ΣΕ ΒΑΘΜΟ ΠΟΥ ΜΠΡΟΣΤΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΩΧΡΙΟΥΝ ΤΑ ΝΕΟΣΥΝΤΗΡΗΤΙΚΑ ΚΟΜΜΑΤΑ.

ΑΥΤΟ ΕΧΕΙ ΣΑΝ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΝΑΔΕΙΞΗ ΜΙΑΣ ΝΕΑΣ ΑΚΡΑΣ ΑΡΙΣΤΕΡΑΣ ΠΟΥ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΙΤΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΡΟΤΣΚΙΣΤΕΣ, ΚΟΜΜΟΥΝΙΣΤΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΝΑΡΧΙΚΟΥΣ.

ΤΑ ΠΑΡΑΠΑΝΩ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΟΥΝ ΜΙΑ ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΗ ΠΕΡΙΛΗΨΗ ΑΡΘΡΟΥ ΤΟΥ

Guy Sorman

ΕΝΟΣ ΓΑΛΛΟΥ ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΟΛΟΓΟΥ ,ΣΥΓΓΡΑΦΕΑ ΤΗΣ»ΑΥΤΟΚΡΑΤΟΡΙΑΣ  ΤΟΥ ΨΕΥΔΟΥΣ» ΠΟΥ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΤΗΚΕ ΣΤΗΝ  ΕΦΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ ΓΚΑΡΝΤΙΑΝ  ΣΤΙΣ 20/12/08.

ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΟ ΤΟ ΑΡΘΡΟ ΕΔΩ

ΔΙΑΒΑΣΤΕ ΕΠΙΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ

Συνέντευξη στο Ιταλικό πολιτικό περιοδικό «L’ Espresso»

ΤΟΥ ΠΡΟΕΔΡΟΥ ΤΗΣ ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΤΙΚΗΣ ΔΙΕΘΝΟΥΣ Γ.Α.ΠΑΠΑΝΔΡΕΟΥ

ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΕΤΕ ΤΗΝ ΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΤΟΥ «ΣΟΣΙΑΛΙΣΤΙΚΟΥ» ΠΑΣΟΚ.

ΕΠΙΛΕΚΤΙΚΑ ΔΕΙΓΜΑΤΑ

Δημοσιογράφος : Γιατί, σε μία περίοδο παγκόσμιας κρίσης που τροφοδοτεί την δυσαρέσκεια σε όλες τις περιοχές του πλανήτη, αυτή η έκρηξη βίας ξέσπασε ακριβώς στην Ελλάδα;

Γ. Α. Παπανδρέου: Η κρίση εδώ είναι πολύ πιο βαθιά. Μέχρι τώρα φάνηκε μόνο η κορυφή του παγόβουνου. Εξαιτίας των νεοφιλελεύθερων πολιτικών καταστράφηκε το δίκτυο προστασίας, το οποίο στην διάρκεια των προηγούμενων σοσιαλιστικών κυβερνήσεων εγγυόταν επενδύσεις, υποδομές, ποιότητα στην διαχείριση της πρόνοιας και της παιδείας. Ο κόσμος χάνει την εμπιστοσύνη του σε ένα σύστημα εξουσίας, που ευνοεί τις πελατειακές σχέσεις και υποβοηθά την διαφθορά. Αυτοί που αντιμετωπίζουν περισσότερες δυσκολίες είναι οι νέοι, oι οποίοι έχουν στερηθεί και αυτά τα κοινωνικά προγράμματα που διευκόλυναν την έξοδό τους από το τούνελ των ναρκωτικών. Μετά την περικοπή των κονδυλίων, οι φοιτητές των δημοσίων ιδρυμάτων είναι εξοργισμένοι, γιατί ξέρουν ότι προορίζονται για ένα μέλλον προσωρινής εργασίας. “Εκατομμύρια δολάρια στους τραπεζίτες, σφαίρες για τους μαθητές”, είναι το σύνθημα που ακούγεται περισσότερο στις διαδηλώσεις. Αυτό που συνθέτει με τον καλύτερο τρόπο την απόσταση αυτής της κυβέρνησης από τα πραγματικά προβλήματα της χώρας. Ο νεοσυντηρητισμός είναι ένα μοντέλο αποτυχημένο. Όπως ο σοσιαλισμός υπονομεύτηκε από την κακή εικόνα της Σοβιετικής Ένωσης, έτσι η δημοκρατία υπέστη φθορά από τα λάθη του George Bush και των οπαδών του.

Δημοσιογράφος: Είστε επίσης Πρόεδρος της Σοσιαλιστικής Διεθνούς. Πώς κρίνετε την κατάσταση της υγείας της Αριστεράς στον κόσμο;

Γ. Α. Παπανδρέου: Θα έλεγα πως είναι ικανοποιητική. Κυρίως μετά τον θρίαμβο του Barack Obama στις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες, ο οποίος υπόσχεται να προωθήσει μια νέα εποχή μεγαλύτερης κοινωνικής δικαιοσύνης, και την αξιοποίηση νέων πηγών ενέργειας για τη βελτίωση της ποιότητας της ζωής σε όλο τον πλανήτη. Όσον αφορά τον δικό μου συντονιστικό ρόλο, πιστεύω πως οι αξίες της σοσιαλδημοκρατίας αποτελούν το πιο κατάλληλο εργαλείο για την αντιμετώπιση των προκλήσεων της σύγχρονης εποχής. Όταν ξέσπασε η χρηματοπιστωτική κρίση, συγκροτήσαμε με τον Joseph Stiglitz, τον κάτοχο του βραβείου Νόμπελ για την οικονομία, μία επιτροπή για να μελετήσει τους δρόμους απεμπλοκής από το αδιέξοδο. Μετά τα τραγικά γεγονότα στη Βομβάη, είχα επαφές τόσο με τον Πρόεδρο του Πακιστάν, Ali Zardari, όσο και με την Πρόεδρο του κυβερνώντος κόμματος στην Ινδία, Sonia Gandhi, για να ετοιμάσουμε μαζί την «ατζέντα» εναντίον της τρομοκρατίας, επωφελούμενος της συμμετοχής αμφοτέρων στη Σοσιαλιστική Διεθνή. Χρειάζεται μια ευρεία συνεργασία για την αντιμετώπιση των σοβαροτάτων κρίσεων αυτών των ετών.

Posted in NWO, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

ΑΙΡΕΤΙΚΗ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΗΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΑ ΤΕΛΕΥΤΑΙΑ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΤΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΑΘΗΝΑ,ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ

Posted by satyrikon στο Δεκέμβριος 15, 2008

ΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΟΥΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΟΨΗ

ΤΟΥ

ΙΩΑΝΝΗ ΜΙΧΑΛΕΤΟΥ

ΓΙΑ ΤΑ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΤΑ ΤΩΝ ΤΕΛΕΥΤΑΙΩΝ ΗΜΕΡΩΝ

Riots in Greece: The undercover news

The present blog has as a main aim to inform a specialized and enlightened audience of the “undercover” nature of events in the Balkan area within the security sector.

In this case, an alternative point of view is going to be presented which derives from a careful analysis and observation of the riots in Greece and reliable information streaming from the domestic security circles. For obvious reasons, matters concerning operational or intelligence procedures will not be mentioned or commented.

The riots were orchestrated since late summer 2008. There were reports within the Greek police that the riots would commence by the Christmas period at the latest; the location and the justification was not known, but any event could have caused them. This is a copycat case of what happened in France in Octomber 2005.

The culprits in the higher level are Islamic netowrks in the Middle East, hand-in-hand with corrupted Western officials that are selling their services for the highest bidder.

The purpose is to destabilize Greece, since it is the “Weakest link” of the Eurozone countries. The ultimate goal is the creation of a European space suitable for expansion of the Middle Eastern networks. For the moment the latter use a variety of techniques to bolster their aims:

Terrorism, disinformation, Psy Ops, bribing officials. They are trying to throw USA against Russia from one side and disentegrate the bonds between EU-USA from the other side. They are the ones that burned Greek forests in summer 2007, in an operation some call “Ibrahim Project”, thus reminding of the same damages in the same region by Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt during the Greek revolution in the summer of 1827.

There is a great issue nowadays with the existence of more than obvious links between renegade intelligence officers of Western origin with anarchist-radical movements in order to destabilize European countries.

The anarchist-radical network of disoriented youth is very strong in Europe as the riots in 2005 showed where the radicals and the Muslims joined forces to damage Sarkozy’s image to no avail. In France recently it was announced by the Ministry of Interior that French anarchists that were in contact with Greek and Italian counterparts, tried to sabotage the railway network (TGV trains). The inability of the western goverments to comprehend what is really at stake already has grave consequences for Europe.

Moreover the deals being made between European and Russian energy companies that will increase natural gas imports by the former, greatly diminishes the influence of the Saudis in Europe along with their long-term income. The new American Administration should really understand that it has been used for a number of years by Riyad (and others) that has already managed to throw American forces into the Iraqi and Afgani battlefields were the new 21st century Mujahedeen forces are being molded. They will be used against Europe in a few years in a play that surpasses the ability of the Western capitals to deal with this kind of war.

Back to Greece, the riots were executed using internet-new media techniques, such as instant messaging from a mobile phone to webpages such as Indymedia along with use of CB’s, facebook pages, walkie-talkies, and construction of “Flow-networks” and already established “dark networks” within the city.

The French goverment has already called for tough action by the Greek goverment, whilst the intelligence apparatus of the former provides assistance to the latter. Over the coming days it seems that all the known security forces in the world will either try to take advantage of the situation or take the side of the Greek goverment.

As a concluding mark, the present blog emphatically notes that the responsibility of the Western capitals is of historical purpotions. Rioting by “Radical youth” will become an everyday reality in the Continent in the coming years and the security forces should look further than their noose when assesing a situation.

A 4th world war errupted in 2001, which has enemy collaborators within our ranks. Before any victory can be called, they should be removed and punished accordingly.

The riots in Greece are just one small incident of the ongoing war that may last more than the previous ones and it is one of all-encompassing national, social, and economic nature.

Interested readers should not forget that the first “Little war” of the Cold war started in Greek soil in 1946. The enemy then was clear and present. Now it is not and the effort will be much more difficult.

Post Scriptum


1)Quite a few Greek “radical groups” have adopted Arabic noms de guerre, promote illegal immigration of Muslims into Europe and call in for the destruction of Western civilazation. They are part of an almost global network that acts as a “Soft power” element of the hard one as envisaged by Al Qaeda. Once more, it has to be stressed that rogue elements of Western security forces protect them and they have to be dealt with as soon as possible.

update 16/12/08

Παρίσι: Αναταράχη από βόμβες Ισλαμιστών, 7 συλλήψεις

Posted in NWO, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 51 Σχόλια »

ΤΟ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΙΚΟ ΟΝΕΙΡΟ ΧΑΘΗΚΕ ΟΧΙ ΜΟΝΟ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΑΛΛΑ ΚΑΙ ΓΙΑ ΟΛΟΥΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΙΟΥΣ

Posted by satyrikon στο Δεκέμβριος 13, 2008

new_sheeple_dees

Η ΠΕΡΙΟΔΟΣ ΤΩΝ ΠΑΧΕΩΝ ΑΓΕΛΑΔΩΝ ΠΕΡΑΣΕ ΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΡΕΠΤΙ ΠΙΑ ΤΟΣΟ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΟΣΟ ΚΑΙ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΙΟΥΣ

ΓΙΑ ΔΕΚΑΕΤΙΕΣ ΟΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΥΠΕΣΤΗΣΑΝ ΠΛΥΣΗ ΕΓΚΕΦΑΛΟΥ ΜΕ ΤΟ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΙΚΟ ΟΝΕΙΡΟ ΠΟΥ ΣΗΜΑΙΝΕ ΧΡΗΜΑ,ΑΥΤΟΚΙΝΗΤΟ,ΕΞΟΧΙΚΟ ΚΑΙ ΚΑΛΟΠΕΡΑΣΗ.

ΒΥΘΙΣΜΕΝΟΙ ΣΤΟΝ ΜΑΓΙΚΟ ΚΟΣΜΟ ΠΟΥ ΕΦΤΙΑΞΑΝ ΤΑ ΜΜΕ ΚΑΙ ΟΙ ΑΔΗΦΑΓΟΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΙ ΣΕ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ ΜΕ ΤΟΥΣ ΤΟΚΟΓΛΥΦΟΥΣ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΙΤΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΔΙΣΤΑΚΤΟΥΣ ΕΡΓΟΛΑΒΟΥΣ ΟΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΝΟΜΙΖΑΝ ΟΤΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΤΟ ΟΝΕΙΡΟ ΘΑ ΗΤΑΝ ΑΘΑΝΑΤΟ.

ΟΜΩΣ Η ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΚΡΙΣΗ ΠΟΥ ΞΕΣΠΑΣΕ ΣΕ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΟ ΕΠΙΠΕΔΟ ΚΑΘΩΣ ΚΑΙ Η ΣΥΡΡΙΚΝΩΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ ΣΕ ΣΥΝΔΥΑΣΜΟ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΟΥΣΙΑ ΟΡΑΜΑΤΟΣ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΗΣΕ ΤΙΣ ΠΡΟΥΠΟΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΗ ΕΚΡΗΞΗ.

ΠΑΡΟΛΑ ΑΥΤΑ ΟΜΩΣ ΗΤΑΝ ΑΝΑΓΚΑΙΑ Η ΑΦΟΡΜΗ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΞΕΣΠΑΣΕΙ Η ΟΡΓΗ ΠΟΥ ΣΥΣΣΩΡΕΥΕΤΟ ΤΟΣΑ ΧΡΟΝΙΑ.

ΕΙΔΙΚΟΤΕΡΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΝΕΟΛΑΙΑ.

ΜΙΑ ΝΕΟΛΑΙΑ ΧΩΡΙΣ ΑΥΡΙΟ, ΜΙΑ ΠΟΥ ΔΕΝ ΤΗΝ ΑΚΟΥΓΕ ΚΑΝΕΙΣ ΓΙΑΤΙ ΤΗΝ ΘΕΩΡΟΥΣΑΝ ΑΠΟΧΑΥΝΩΜΕΝΗ.

ΜΙΑ ΝΕΟΛΑΙΑ ΑΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΑΛΛΑ ΜΕ ΕΠΙΘΥΜΙΑ ΝΑ ΖΗΣΕΙ.

ΚΑΙ Η ΑΦΟΡΜΗ ΗΡΘΕ.

Η ΔΟΛΟΦΟΝΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΝΕΑΡΟΥ ΣΤΑ ΕΞΑΡΧΕΙΑ.

ΟΙ ΕΞΕΛΙΞΕΙΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΓΝΩΣΤΕΣ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΣΕ ΟΛΟΥΣ.

ΑΥΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΓΝΩΣΤΟ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΣΥΝΕΧΕΙΑ ΚΑΙ Η ΚΑΤΕΥΘΥΝΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΕΚΡΗΞΗΣ.

ΣΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΗ ΑΓΩΝΙΟΥΝ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΙΟ ΠΟΥ ΘΑ ΜΟΛΥΝΕΙ ΤΙΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΙΚΕΣ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΛΙΓΟ ΠΟΛΥ ΕΧΟΥΝ ΤΑ ΙΔΙΑ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ.

ΤΟ ΠΕΡΙΕΡΓΟ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΟΤΙ ΣΕ ΧΡΟΝΟ ΜΗΔΕΝ ΒΡΕΘΗΚΑΝ ΣΕ ΕΞΕΓΕΡΣΗ ΠΟΛΛΕΣ ΠΟΛΕΙΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ ΑΛΛΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΑΥΤΟΧΡΟΝΑ ΕΓΙΝΑΝ ΕΚΔΗΛΩΣΕΙΣ ΔΙΑΜΑΡΤΥΡΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΣΕ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΙΚΕΣ ΠΡΩΤΕΥΟΥΣΕΣ.

ΛΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΚΑΠΟΙΟ ΑΟΡΑΤΟ ΧΕΡΙ ΣΥΝΤΟΝΙΖΕ ΚΑΙ ΚΑΘΟΔΗΓΟΥΣΕ ΟΛΕΣ ΑΥΤΕΣ ΤΙΣ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΕΣ.

ΤΑΥΤΟΧΡΟΝΑ ΑΥΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΔΙΑΠΙΣΤΩΝΕΙ ΚΑΠΟΙΟΣ ΣΕ ΑΥΤΗ ΤΗΝ ΚΙΝΗΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΕΞΕΓΕΡΣΗ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΑΠΟΥΣΙΑ ΣΥΓΚΕΚΡΙΜΕΝΩΝ ΑΙΤΗΜΑΤΩΝ ΚΑΙ Η ΒΙΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΒΙΑ.

Η ΒΙΑ ΑΥΤΗ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΗΣΕ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΔΥΟ ΣΤΡΑΤΟΠΕΔΑ ΠΟΥ ΤΗΝ ΩΡΑ ΑΥΤΗ ΑΙΣΘΑΝΟΝΤΑΙ ΑΣΒΕΣΤΟ ΜΙΣΟΣ ΤΟ ΕΝΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΑΛΛΟ.

ΤΟΥΣ ΔΙΑΔΗΛΩΤΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΜΙΑ ΜΕΡΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΚΟΥΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΑΛΛΗ.

Η ΑΠΟΣΤΑΣΙΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΑΥΤΗ ΘΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΧΡΗΣΙΜΗ ΣΤΟ ΜΕΛΛΟΝ.

ΕΙΝΑΙ ΣΙΓΟΥΡΟ ΟΤΙ Η ΕΞΑΠΛΩΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟΥ ΙΟΥ ΤΗΣ ΕΞΕΓΕΡΣΗΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΗ ΘΑ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΗΣΕΙ ΤΟ ΥΠΟΒΑΘΡΟ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΙΑ ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΚΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ.

ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΕΥΝΟΗΤΟ.

ΕΠΡΕΠΕ ΟΙ ΑΡΧΟΝΤΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΕ ΝΑ ΠΡΟΛΑΒΟΥΝ ΤΑ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΤΑ.

ΓΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΕΠΡΕΠΕ ΝΑ ΤΑ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΗΣΟΥΝ ΤΩΡΑ ΠΡΙΝ Η ΚΑΤΑΣΤΑΣΗ ΛΟΓΩ ΤΗΣ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗΣ ΚΡΙΣΗΣ ΛΑΒΕΙ ΑΝΕΞΕΛΕΓΚΤΕΣ ΔΙΑΣΤΑΣΕΙΣ.

1.Greek protests spread with arrests across Europe

2.Greek fighting: the eurozone’s weakest link starts to crack

3.In Greece, Protests Echo European Students’ Ire

4.Greek anger infects Europe

5.What’s scary about Greeks rioting?

6.Greek riots signal troubled future for Europe

7.Greek violence spreads across Europe

ΓΙΑ ΑΝΑΡΩΤΗΘΕΙΤΕ.

Η ΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΣΗ ΔΗΛΑΔΗ

ΤΟ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ

ΗΤΑΝ ΤΟΣΟ  ΑΝΙΣΧΥΡΟ ΝΑ ΕΠΙΒΑΛΛΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΤΑΞΗ

Η

ΔΕΝ ΗΘΕΛΕ ΝΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΠΙΒΑΛΛΕΙ?

Posted in NWO, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Σχόλια »

«ΑΝΤΙΕΞΟΥΣΙΑΣΤΕΣ» ΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΙ : ΟΥΔΕΝ ΚΑΚΟ ΑΜΙΓΕΣ ΚΑΛΟΥ

Posted by satyrikon στο Δεκέμβριος 9, 2008

ΤΑ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΤΑ ΠΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΑΙΝΟΥΝ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΑ ΟΠΟΙΑ ΠΡΩΤΟΣΤΑΤΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΓΝΩΣΤΟΙ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΙ «ΑΝΤΙΕΞΟΥΣΙΑΣΤΕΣ» ΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΙ -ΠΑΡΑ ΤΟ ΓΕΓΟΝΟΣ ΤΩΝ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΡΟΦΩΝ- ΕΧΟΥΝ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΛΗ ΤΟΥΣ ΠΛΕΥΡΑ.

ΑΣ ΠΑΡΟΥΜΕ ΟΜΩΣ ΤΑ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΑ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΣΕΙΡΑ.

ΤΟ ΣΥΝΑΙΣΘΗΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΥΠΟΒΑΘΡΟ ΤΟ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΗΣΕ Ο ΜΠΑΤΣΟΣ ΠΟΥ ΔΟΛΟΦΟΝΗΣΕ ΤΟΝ ΝΕΑΡΟ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟ.

ΤΗΝ ΕΚΜΕΤΑΛΛΕΥΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΣΥΝΑΙΣΘΗΜΑΤΙΚΟΥ ΥΠΟΒΑΘΡΟΥ ΑΝΕΛΑΒΑΝ ΟΙ ΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΙ ΣΥΝΑΓΩΝΙΣΤΕΣ ΤΟΥ-ΠΑΡΟΤΙ ΔΙΑΦΕΡΟΥΝ ΩΣ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΙΣ ΜΙΣΘΟΔΟΤΙΚΕΣ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΑΣΕΙΣ-.

Η ΔΟΛΟΦΟΝΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ ΑΓΓΙΞΕ ΤΙΣ ΕΥΑΙΣΘΗΤΕΣ ΣΥΝΑΙΣΘΗΜΑΤΙΚΕΣ ΧΟΡΔΕΣ ΟΛΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΩΝ, ΚΥΡΙΩΣ ΟΜΩΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΕΩΝ-ΦΟΙΤΗΤΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΜΑΘΗΤΩΝ-ΤΗΣ ΝΕΑΣ ΓΕΝΙΑΣ.

ΜΙΑΣ ΝΕΑΣ ΓΕΝΙΑΣ ΠΟΥ ΔΕΝ ΕΧΕΙ ΟΡΑΜΑ ,ΔΕΝ ΕΧΕΙ ΜΕΛΛΟΝ , ΔΕΝ ΝΟΙΩΘΕΙ ΑΣΦΑΛΕΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΠΑΡΑΛΛΗΛΑ ΑΚΟΥΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΒΛΕΠΕΙ ΤΟ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ ΝΑ ΤΡΩΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΠΙΝΕΙ ΣΕ ΧΛΙΔΑΤΑ ΣΑΛΟΝΙΑ.

ΑΚΟΥΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΒΛΕΠΕΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥΣ, ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΙΕΣ, ΜΕΓΑΛΟΔΗΜΟΣΙΟΓΡΑΦΟΥΣ , ΜΕΓΑΛΟΗΘΟΠΟΙΟΥΣ , ΜΕΓΑΛΟΚΑΛΛΙΤΕΧΝΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΓΑΛΠΟΔΟΣΦΑΙΡΙΣΤΕΣ ΝΑ ΠΑΙΖΟΥΝ ΜΕ ΕΚΑΤΟΜΜΥΡΙΑ ΕΥΡΩ.

ΤΗΝ ΕΚΜΕΤΑΛΛΕΥΣΗ ΑΥΤΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΥΠΟΒΟΣΚΟΥΣΑΣ ΟΡΓΗΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΧΛΙΔΑΤΗ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΩΣΑ ΤΑΞΗ ΑΝΕΛΑΒΑΝ ΝΑ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΝΑΛΙΖΑΡΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΙ ΟΙ ΟΠΟΙΟΙ ΠΡΟΞΕΝΗΣΑΝ ΗΔΗ ΤΕΡΑΣΤΙΕΣ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΡΟΦΕΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΑΘΗΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΑΛΛΑ ΑΣΤΙΚΑ ΚΕΝΤΡΑ.

ΟΜΩΣ ΕΔΩ ΑΚΡΙΒΩΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΟ ΚΑΛΟ.

ΔΕΝ ΞΕΡΟΥΜΕ ΠΩΣ ΘΑ ΕΞΕΛΙΧΘΟΥΝ ΑΥΡΙΟ ΤΑ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΑ.

ΟΜΩΣ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΕΒΓΑΛΑΝ ΣΤΟ ΠΡΟΣΚΗΝΙΟ ΚΑΙ ΡΙΖΟΣΠΑΣΤΙΚΟΠΟΙΗΣΑΝ ΕΝΑ ΜΕΓΑΛΟ ΜΕΡΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΝΕΑΣ ΓΕΝΙΑΣ ΑΣΧΕΤΑ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΜΟΡΦΗ ΕΚΔΗΛΩΣΗΣ ΑΥΤΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΤΑΠΙΕΣΜΕΝΗΣ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΩΝ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΡΟΦΙΚΩΝ ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΩΝ ΤΗΣ.

ΜΠΡΑΒΟ ΛΟΙΠΟΝ ΣΤΟΥΣ ΕΜΠΝΕΥΣΤΕΣ ΑΥΤΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΚΑΤΑΣΤΡΟΦΙΚΩΝ ΕΚΔΗΛΩΣΕΩΝ ΠΟΥ ΟΠΩΣ ΛΕΕΙ ΚΑΙ Ο ΠΑΥΛΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ «ΟΤΙ ΠΡΑΤΤΟΥΝ ΤΟ ΠΡΑΤΤΟΥΝ ΓΙΑ ΙΔΙΟΤΕΛΕΙΣ ΣΚΟΠΟΥΣ».

ΑΥΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΔΕΝ ΕΚΑΝΑΝ ΤΑ ΚΟΜΜΑΤΑ ΤΟ ΕΚΑΝΑΝ ΟΙ ΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΙ.

Η ΕΝΕΡΓΕΙΑ ΑΥΤΗ ΟΜΩΣ ΘΑ ΓΥΡΙΣΕΙ ΜΠΟΥΜΕΡΑΓΚ ΓΙΑΤΙ ΟΤΑΝ ΚΑΤΑΚΑΘΙΣΕΙ Η ΠΡΩΤΗ ΟΡΓΗ ΚΑΙ ΕΠΙΚΡΑΤΗΣΕΙ Η ΣΚΕΨΗ ΤΟΤΕ ΑΥΤΗ Η ΝΕΑ ΓΕΝΙΑ ΘΑ ΒΡΕΙ ΤΟΝ ΕΧΘΡΟ ΤΗΣ ΠΟΥ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΚΑΤΑΣΤΡΟΦΗ ΑΛΛΑ Η ΟΡΓΑΝΩΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΠΑΛΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΟΡΑΜΑΤΟΣ ΤΗΣ.

«ΟΥΔΕΝ ΚΑΚΟ ΑΜΙΓΕΣ ΚΑΛΟΥ«

ΑΡΑΓΕ ΟΙ «ΑΝΤΙΕΞΟΥΣΙΑΣΤΕΣ» ΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΙ ΠΟΥ ΚΑΨΑΝΕ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΕΣ ΣΗΜΑΙΕΣ

ΣΤΗΝ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗ ΜΗΠΩΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΛΒΑΝΟΙ?

Posted in Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Ο ΤΕΤΑΡΤΟΣ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΟΣ ΠΟΛΕΜΟΣ(ΟΜΙΛΙΑ ΤΟΥ Subcomandante Marcos La Realidad, Chiapas, Mexico)

Posted by satyrikon στο Δεκέμβριος 4, 2008

ΑΦΙΕΡΩΝΕΤΑΙ

ΣΤΟΥΣ «ΡΟΖ ΕΠΑΝΑΣΤΑΤΕΣ» ΤΟΥ ΣΥΡΙΖΑ

ΚΑΙ

ΣΤΟΥΣ «ΓΝΩΣΤΟΥΣ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥΣ» ΚΟΥΚΟΥΛΟΦΟΡΟΥΣ

(ΑΝΑΡΧΙΚΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΚΙΑΣ ΣΥΜΦΟΡΑΣ)

The Fourth World War

Subcomandante Marcos

La Realidad, Chiapas, Mexico


Translated by irlandesa

The following text is an excerpt from a talk given by Subcomandante Insurgente Marcos to the International Civil Commission of Human Rights Observation in La Realidad, Chiapas on November 20, 1999. The outline for the talk was published in Letters 5.1 and 5.2 in November of the same year, with the titles «Chiapas: the War: 1, Between the Satellite and the Microscope, the Other’s Gaze,» and 2, «The Machinery of Ethnocide.» Any similarity to the conditions of the current war is purely coincidental. Published in Spanish in La Jornada, Tuesday, October 23, 2001.

The Restructuring of War

As we see it, there are several constants in the so-called world wars, in the First World War, in the Second, and in what we call the Third and Fourth.

One of these constants is the conquest of territories and their reorganization. If you consult a map of the world you can see that there were changes at the end of all of the world wars, not only in the conquest of territories, but in the forms of organization. After the First World War, there was a new world map, after the Second World War, there was another world map.

At the end of what we venture to call the «Third World War,» and which others call the Cold War, a conquest of territories and a reorganization took place. It can, broadly speaking, be situated in the late 80’s, with the collapse of the socialist camp of the Soviet Union, and, by the early 90’s, what we call the Fourth World War can be discerned.

Another constant is the destruction of the enemy. Such was the case with nazism in the second World War, and, in the Third, with all that had been known as the USSR and the socialist camp as an option to the capitalist world.

The third constant is the administration of conquest. At the moment at which the conquest of territories is achieved, it is necessary to administer them, so that the winnings can be disbursed to the force which won. We use the term ‘conquest» quite a bit, because we are experts in this. Those States, which previously called themselves national, have always tried to conquer the Indian peoples. Despite those constants, there are a series of variables which change from one world war to another: strategy, the actors, or the parties, the armaments used and, lastly, the tactics. Although the latter change, the former are present and can be applied in order to understand one war and another.

The Third World War, or the Cold War, lasted from 1946 (or, if you wish, from the bombing of Hiroshima in 1945) until 1985-1990. It was a large world war made up of many local wars. As in all the others, at the end there was a conquest of territories which destroyed an enemy. Second act, it moved to the administration of the conquest and the reorganization of territories. The actors in this world war were: one, the two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union and their respective satellites; two, the majority of the European countries; three, Latin America, Africa, parts of Asia and Oceana. The peripheral countries revolved around the US or the USSR, as it suited them. After the superpowers and the peripherals were the spectators and victims, or, that is, the rest of the world. The two superpowers did not always fight face to face. They often did so through other countries. While the large industrialized nations joined with one of the two blocs, the rest of the countries and of the population appeared as spectators or as victims. What characterized this war was: one, the arms orientation and, two, local wars. In the nuclear war, the two superpowers competed in order to see how many times they could destroy the world. The method of convincing the enemy was to present it with a very large force. At the same time, local wars were taking place everywhere in which the superpowers were involved.

The result, as we all know, was the defeat and destruction of the USSR, and the victory of the US, around which the great majority of countries have now come together. This is when what we call the «Fourth World War» broke out. And here a problem arose. The product of the previous war should have been a unipolar world – one single nation which dominated a world where there were no rivals – but, in order to make itself effective, this unipolar world would have to reach what is known as «globalization.» The world must be conceived as a large conquered territory with an enemy destroyed. It was necessary to administer this new world, and, therefore, to globalize it. They turned, then, to information technology, which, in the development of humanity, is as important as the invention of the steam engine. Computers allow one to be anywhere simultaneously. There are no longer any borders or constraints of time or geography. It is thanks to computers that the process of globalization began. Separations, differences, Nation States, all eroded, and the world became what is called, realistically, the global village.

The concept on which globalization is based is what we call «neoliberalism,» a new religion which is going to permit this process to be carried out. With this Fourth World War, once again, territories are being conquered, enemies are being destroyed and the conquest of these territories is being administered.

The problem is, what territories are being conquered and reorganized, and who is the enemy? Given that the previous enemy has disappeared, we are saying that humanity is now the enemy. The Fourth World War is destroying humanity as globalization is universalizing the market, and everything human which opposes the logic of the market is an enemy and must be destroyed. In this sense, we are all the enemy to be vanquished: indigenous, non-indigenous, human rights observers, teachers, intellectuals, artists. Anyone who believes themselves to be free and is not.

This Fourth World War uses what we call «destruction.» Territories are destroyed and depopulated. At the point at which war is waged, land must be destroyed, turned into desert. Not out of a zeal for destruction, but in order to rebuild and reorder it. What is the primary problem confronted by this unipolar world in globalizing itself? Nation States, resistances, cultures, each nation’s means of relating, that which makes them different. How is it possible for the village to be global and for everyone to be equal if there are so many differences? When we say that it is necessary to destroy Nation States and to turn them into deserts, it does not mean doing away with the people, but with the peoples’ ways of being. After destroying, one must rebuild. Rebuild the territories and give them another place. The place which the laws of the market determine. This is what is driving globalization.

The first obstacle is the Nation States: they must be attacked and destroyed. Everything which makes a State «national» must be destroyed: language, culture, economy, its political life and its social fabric. If national languages are no longer of use, they must be destroyed, and a new language must be promoted. Contrary to what one might think, it is not English, but computers. All languages must be made the same, translated into computer language, even English. All cultural aspects that make a French person French, an Italian Italian, a Dane Danish, a Mexican Mexican, must be destroyed, because they are barriers which prevent them from entering the globalized market. It is no longer a question of making one market for the French, and another for the English or the Italians. There must be one single market, in which the same person can consume the same product in any part of the world, and where the same person acts like a citizen of the world, and no longer as a citizen of a Nation State.

That means that cultural history, the history of tradition, clashes with this process and is the enemy of the Fourth World War. This is especially serious in Europe where there are nations with great traditions. The cultural framework of the French, the Italians, the English, the Germans, the Spanish, etcetera – everything which cannot be translated into computer and market terms – are an impediment to this globalization. Goods are now going to circulate through information channels, and everything else must be destroyed or set aside. Nation States have their own economic structures and what is called «national bourgeoisie» – capitalists with national headquarters and with national profits. This can no longer exist: if the economy is decided at a global level, the economic policies of Nation States which try to protect capital are an enemy which must be defeated. The Free Trade Treaty, and the one which led to the European Union, the Euro, are symptoms that the economy is being globalized, although in the beginning it was about regional globalization, like in the case of Europe. Nation States construct their political relationships, but now political relationships are of no use. I am not characterizing them as good or bad. The problem is that these political relationships are an impediment to the realization of the laws of the market. The national political class is old, it is no longer useful, it has to be changed. They try to remember, they try to remember, even if it is the name of one single statesman in Europe. They simply cannot. The most important figures in the Europe of the Euro are people like the president of the Bundesbank, a banker. What he says is going to determine the policies of the different presidents or prime ministers inflicted on the countries of Europe.

If the social fabric is broken, the old relationships of solidarity which make coexistence possible in a Nation State also break down. That is why campaigns against homosexuals and lesbians, against immigrants, or the campaigns of xenophobia, are encouraged. Everything which previously maintained a certain equilibrium has to be broken at the point at which this world war attacks a Nation State and transforms it into something else.

It is about homogenizing, of making everyone equal, and of hegemonizing a lifestyle. It is global life. Its greatest diversion should be the computer, its work should be the computer, its value as a human being should be the number of credit cards, one’s purchasing capacity, one’s productive capacity. The case of the teachers is quite clear. The one who has the most knowledge or who is the wisest is no longer valuable. Now the one who produces the most research is valuable, and that is how his salary, his grants, his place in the university, are decided.

This has a lot to do with the United States model. It also so happens, however, that this Fourth World War produces an opposite effect, which we call «fragmentation.» The world is, paradoxically, not becoming one, it is breaking up into many pieces. Although it is assumed that the citizen is being made equal, differences as differences are emerging: homosexuals and lesbians, young people, immigrants. Nation States are functioning as a large State, the anonymous State-land-society which divides us into many pieces.

If you look at a world map of this period – the end of the Third World War – and analyze the last eight years, a restructuring took place, most especially – but not only – in Europe. Where there was once one nation, now there are many nations. The world map has been fragmented. This is the paradoxical effect that is taking place because of this Fourth World War. Instead of being globalized, the world is fragmenting, and, instead of this mechanism hegemonizing and homogenizing, more and more differences are appearing. Globalization and neoliberalism are making the world an archipelago. And it must be given a market logic. These fragments must be organized into a common denominator. It is what we call «financial bomb.»

At the same time that differences appear, the differences are multiplied. Each young person has his group, his way of thinking, such as punks and skinheads. All of which are in every country. Now the different are not only different, but their differences are multiplied and they seek their own identity. The Fourth World War is obviously not offering them a mirror that allows them to see themselves with a common denominator. It is offering them a broken mirror. As long as it has control of the archipelago – of human beings – the powers are not going to be very upset.

The world is breaking into many pieces, large and small. There are no longer continents in the sense that I would be a European, African or American. What the globalization of neoliberalism is offering is a network built by financial capital, or, if you would prefer, by financial powers. If there is a crisis in this node, the rest of the network will cushion the effects. If there is prosperity in a country, it does not produce the effect of prosperity in other countries. It is, thus, a network which does not function. What they told us about the size of the world was a lie, a speech repeated by the leaders of Latin America, whether Menem, Fujimori, Zedillo, or others leaders of compromised moral character. In fact what is happening is that the network has made Nation States much more vulnerable. It is useless for a country to struggle to construct an equilibrium and its own destiny as a nation. Everything depends on what happens in a bank in Japan, or what the mafia in Russia or a speculator in Sydney does. In one way or another, Nation States are not saved, they are permanently condemned. When a Nation State agrees to join this network – because there is no other choice, because they force it, or out of conviction – it is signing its death certificate.

In short, what this great market wants is to turn all of these islands into commercial centers, not nations. One can go from one country to another and find the same products. There is no longer any difference. In Paris or in San Cristóbal de las Casas you can consume the same thing. If you are in San Cristóbal de Las Casas, you can simultaneously be in Paris getting the news. It is the end of Nation States. And not just that: it is the end of the human beings who make them up. What matters is the law of the market, and that is what establishes how much you produce, how much you are worth, how much you buy, how much you are worth. Dignity, resistance, solidarity all disturb. Everything which prevents a human being from turning into a producing and purchasing machine is an enemy, and it must be destroyed. That is why we are saying that the human species is the enemy for the Fourth World War. It is not destroying it physically, but it is destroying its humanness.

Paradoxically, by destroying Nation States, dignity, resistance and solidarity are built anew. There are no ties stronger, more solid, than those which exist between different groups: between homosexuals, between lesbians, between young people, between migrants. This war, then, goes on to also attack those who are different. That is what those campaigns are owing to, so strong in Europe and in the United States, against the different, because they are dark, speak another language or have another culture. The means of cultivating xenophobia in what remains of the Nation States is to make threats: «These Turkish migrants want to take away your job.» «These Mexican immigrants came to rape, they came to steal, they came to sow bad habits.» Nation States – or the few of them that remain – delegate to those new citizens of the world – computers – the role of getting rid of those immigrants. And that is when groups like the Ku Klux Klan proliferate, or persons of such probity as Berlusconi reach power. They all build their campaigns based on xenophobia. Hate for the different, persecution against anything that is different, is worldwide. But the resistance of anything that is different is also worldwide. Faced with that aggression, these differences are multiplied, they are solidified. This is how it is, I am not going to characterize it as good or bad, that is how it is happening.

The War Is Not Only Military

In strictly military terms, the Third World War had its logic. It was, in the first place, a conventional war, conceptualized in such a way that, if I put in soldiers, and you put in soldiers, we confront each other, and whoever is left alive wins. This took place in a specific territory which, in the case of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO, forces, and the Warsaw Pact, was Europe. Starting from a conventional war, between armies, a military and weapons oriented path was established.

We are going to look at the details a bit more. This [he shows a rifle], for example, is a semi-automatic weapon, and it’s called an AR-15 automatic rifle. They manufactured it for the Vietnam conflict, and it can be taken apart very easily [he disarms it], there it is. When they made it, the Americans were thinking about a conventional war scenario, that is, large military contingents which confronted each other. «We’ll collect a lot of soldiers, we’ll advance, and in the end someone will have to be left.» At the same time, the Warsaw Pact was developing the Kalashnikov automatic rifle, which is commonly called the AK-47, a weapon with a lot of firing volume at short range, up to 400 meters. The Soviet concept involved large waves of troops: a mountain of soldiers would advance, firing, and, if they died, a second and a third wave would arrive. The one who had the most soldiers would win.

The Americans then thought: «The old Garand rifle from the Second World War isn’t of any use anymore. Now we need a weapon that has a lot of short-range firing power.» They took out the AR-15 and tested it in Vietnam. The problem was that it broke down, it didn’t work. When they attacked the Viet Cong, the mechanism remained open, and when they fired it went «click.» And it wasn’t a camera, it was a weapon. They tried to solve the problem with an M16-A1 model. Here the trick is in the bullets, which are called two different things. One, the civilian, 2.223 of an inch – can be bought in any store in the United States. The other – 5.56 millimeter – is for the exclusive use of NATO. This is a very fast bullet and it has a trick to it. In war, the objective is to see that the enemy has losses, not deaths, and an army considers itself to have casualties when a soldier can no longer fight. The Geneva Convention – an agreement to humanize war – forbids expanding bullets, because at the point at which it enters it destroys more, and it’s a lot more lethal than a hard tipped bullet.

«Given that the idea is to increase the number of wounded and decrease the number of dead,» – they said – «we are prohibiting expansive bullets.» A shot from a hard bullet leaves you useless, you’re a casualty now, it doesn’t kill you unless it reaches a vital organ. In order to fulfill the Geneva Convention and to dupe them, the Americans created the soft tip bullet which, when it enters the human body, bends and turns. The entrance hole is one size, and the exit hole is much bigger. This bullet is worse than the expanding one, and it doesn’t violate conventions. Nonetheless, if it gets you in the arm…it will blow you up. A 162 bullet goes through you and leaves you wounded, but this one destroys you. Coincidentally, the Mexican government has just bought 16,000 of these bullets.

That is, weapons are created for precise scenarios. We are going to assume they don’t want to use the nuclear bomb. What are they going to use? Many soldiers against many soldiers. And so the NATO and Warsaw Pact conventional war doctrines were created.

The second option was a localized nuclear war, a war with nuclear weapons, but only in some places and not in others. There was an agreement between the two superpowers to not attack each other in their own lands, and to fight only on neutral ground. It remains to be said that that this ground was Europe. That’s where the bombs were going to fall and one would see who would be left alive in Western Europe and what was then called Eastern Europe.

The last option of the Third World War was total nuclear war, which was a huge business, the business of the century. The logic of nuclear war is that there would be no winner. It doesn’t matter who fired first, no matter how quickly he fired, the other would be able to fire also. The destruction was mutual, and, from the beginning, this option was simply renounced. The nature of it came to be what is called in military diplomatic terms, «deterrence.»

So that the Soviets wouldn’t use nuclear weapons, the Americans developed many nuclear weapons, and, so that they wouldn’t use nuclear weapons, the Soviets developed many nuclear weapons, and so on. They called it IBM (Intercontinental Ballistic Missile), and they were the rockets that went from Russia to the United States and from the United States to Russia. They cost a fortune, and now they’re not useful for anything. There were also other nuclear weapons for local use which were the ones they were going to use in Europe in the case of a localized nuclear war.

When this phase began, in 1945, there was a war to be fought because Europe was divided in two. The military strategy – we are speaking of the purely military aspects – was the following: a few forward positions in front of the enemy line, a line of permanent logistics, and the mother country, called the United States or the Soviet Union. The logistical line supplied the forward positions. Large airplanes that were in the air 24 hours a day, the B-52 Fortress, carried the nuclear bombs, and they never had to land. And there were the pacts. The NATO Pact, the Warsaw Pact and the SEATO (South East Asia Treaty Organization) Pact, which is like the NATO of the Asian countries. The model was put into play in local wars. Everything had a logic, and it was logical to fight in Vietnam, which was an agreed scenario. The local armies and insurgents were in the role of the forward positions. In the role of permanent logistics were the lines of clandestine or legal arms sales, and, in the role of the mother countries, the two superpowers. And there was also an agreement about the places where they had to remain as spectators. The clearest examples of these local wars are the dictatorships of Latin America, the conflicts in Asia, especially Vietnam, and the wars in Africa. These apparently had absolutely no logic whatsoever, since the majority of the time what was going on wasn’t understood. But what was happening was part of this outline of conventional war.

It was during this period – and that is important – that the concept of «total war» was being developed. Elements which are no longer military enter into military doctrine. For example, in Vietnam, from the Tet offensive (1968) until the fall of Saigon (1975), the media again became a very important battle front. And so, the idea began to develop in the military that military power was not enough. It was necessary to incorporate others, such as the media. And also that the enemy could be attacked with economic measures, with political measures and with diplomacy, which is the game of the United Nations and of international organizations. Some countries create sabotage in order to secure the condemnation or censuring of others, which is called «diplomatic war.»

All these wars followed the domino theory. It sounds ridiculous, but they were like two rivals playing dominoes with the rest of the population. One of the opponents would put down a piece, and the other would try to put his down in order to cut off the follow-up. It is the theory of that illustrious individual by the name of Kissinger, the Secretary of State for the United States government during the Vietnam era, who said: «We cannot abandon Vietnam because it would mean giving up the game of dominoes in Southeast Asia to the others.» And that is why they did what they did in Vietnam.

It was also about trying to regain the logic of the Second World War. For most of the population, it [the Second World War] had been heroic. There was the image of the Marines liberating France from the dictatorship, liberating Italy from the Duce, liberating Germany from the military, the red army entering from all sides. The Second World War was supposedly waged in order to eliminate a danger for all humanity, that of national socialism. Thus the local wars attempted, one way or another, to regain the ideology of «we are acting in the defense of the free world.» But now Moscow was in the role of national socialism. And Moscow, for its part, did the same thing: both superpowers tried to use the argument of «democracy» and the «free world», as each of them conceived it.

Afterwards came the Fourth World War, which destroyed everything from before, because the world is no longer the same, and the same strategy cannot be applied. The concept of «total war» was developed further: it is not only a war on all fronts, it is a war which can be anywhere, a total war in which the entire world is at stake. «Total war» means: at any moment, in any place, under any circumstances. The idea of fighting for one place in particular no longer exists. Now the fight can take place at any moment. There is no longer the concept of escalation of the conflict with threats, the taking of positions and attempts to reposition oneself. At any moment and in any circumstances, a conflict can arise. It can be domestic problem, it can be a dictator and everything which the last wars of the last five years have been, from Kosovo to the Persian Gulf War. The entire military routine of the Cold War has, thus, been destroyed.

It is not possible to make war, in the Fourth World War, under the criteria of the Third, because now I have to fight any place, I don’t know where I’m going to have to fight, nor do I know when, I have to act rapidly, I don’t even know what circumstances I’m going to have to prosecute this war. In order to resolve the problem, the military first developed the «rapid deployment» war. An example would be the Persian Gulf War, a war which involved a great accumulation of military force in a short period of time, a large military action in a short period of time, the conquering of territories and withdrawal. The invasion of Panama would be another example of rapid deployment. There is, in fact, a NATO contingent which is called «rapid intervention force.» Rapid deployment is a large mass of military force which throws itself against the enemy and which makes no distinction between a children’s hospital and a chemical weapons factory. That is what happened in Iraq: the smart bombs were quite stupid, they made no distinctions. And that’s where they remained, because they realized that this is quite expensive, and it contributes very little. In Iraq they made an entire deployment, but there was no conquest of territory. There were the problems of the local protests, there were the international human rights observers.

They had to withdraw. Vietnam had already taught them that, in these instances, it is not prudent to insist: «No, we can’t do this now,» they said. They then moved on to the strategy of «projection of force.» «Better to have forward positions in North American military bases all over the world, accumulating a great continental force which, in a matter of hours or days, will have the capacity to put in military units any place in the world.» And they can, in fact, put in a division of four or five thousand men in the most distant point in the planet in four days, and more, constantly more.

But the projection of force has the problem of being based on local soldiers, or, rather, on US soldiers. They believe that, if the conflict is not resolved rapidly, the body bags, the dead, will begin arriving, like in Vietnam, and this could provoke many domestic protests in North America, or in whichever country. In order to avoid those problems, they abandoned the projection of force, making – let us be clear – mercantile calculations. They did not make calculations about the destruction of the human forces, or the natural ones, but of publicity and image. And so the war of projection was abandoned, and they went on to a model of war with local soldiers, more international help, more of a supranational body. Now it was not about sending soldiers, but of fighting by means of the soldiers who were there, helping them according to the basis of the conflict, and not using the model of a nation which declares war, but of a supranational body like the UN or NATO. The ones doing the dirty work are the local soldiers, and the ones in the newspapers are the Americans and the international support. This is the model. Protesting no longer works: it is not a war of the United States government. It’s a war by NATO, and, besides, NATO is merely doing the favor of helping the UN.

Throughout the entire world, the restructuring of armies is so that they can confront a local conflict with international support under supranational cover, and under the disguise of humanitarian war. It has to do with saving the population from a genocide by killing it. And that is what happened in Kosovo. Milosevich waged a war against humanity: «If we confront Milosevich, we are defending humanity.» That is the argument the NATO generals used and which brought so many problems to the European left: opposing NATO bombings implied supporting Milosevich, better, then, to support the NATO bombings. And Milosevich, you know, was armed by the United States. The military conception – which is what is now at play – is that the entirety of the world – whether Sri Lanka or any other country, the most distant one can think of – is now the backyard, because the globalized world produces simultaneity. And that is the problem: in this globalized world, anything that happens any place affects the new international order. The world is no longer the world, it’s a village, and everything is very close. Therefore the great policemen of the world – especially the United States – have the right to intervene anywhere, at any time, under any circumstances. They can consider anything as a threat to their domestic security. They can easily decide that the indigenous uprising in Chiapas threatens the domestic security of North America, or the Tamils in Sri Lanka, or whatever you want. Any movement – and not necessarily armed – anyplace can be considered a threat to domestic security.

What is that has happened? The old strategies and old concepts of making war have collapsed. Let us see.

«Theatre of operations» is the military term for indicating the place where the war is going to occur. In the Third World War, Europe was the theatre of operations. Now it is not known where it is going to break out, it could be any place, it is no longer certain that it is going to be in Europe. Military doctrine moves from what is called «system» to what they call «versatility.» «I have to be ready to do anything at any moment. A plan is no longer sufficient: now I need many plans, not just to construct a response to particular incidents, but to construct many military responses to specific incidents.» This is where information technology intervenes. This change leads to moving from the systematic, the inflexible, the rigid, to the versatile, to that which can change from one moment to the next. And that is going to define the entire new military doctrine of armies, of military corps and of soldiers. This will be one element in the Fourth World War. The other will be the movement from «containment strategy» to that of «drawing out» or «extension»: now it is not just about conquering territory, containing the enemy, now it is about prolonging the conflict to what they call «non-war acts.» In the case of Chiapas, this has to do with taking out and putting in governments and municipal presidents, with human rights, with the media, etcetera.

Included in the new military conception is an intensification of the conquest of territory. This means that it is necessary to not only be concerned about the EZLN and its military force, but also about the church, the NGOs, international observers, the press, civilians, etcetera. There are no longer civilians and neutrals. The entire world is part of the conflict.

This implies that national armies are of no use, because they no longer have to defend Nation States. If there are no Nation States, what are they going to defend? Under the new doctrine, national armies go on to play the role of local police. The case of Mexico is quite clear: the Mexican Army is doing more and more police work, like the fight against drug trafficking, or this new body against organized crime which is called the Federal Preventative Police and which is made up of military personnel. It is about national armies turning into local police in the manner of a US comic book: a Super Cop, a Super Police. When the army in the former Yugoslavia was reorganized, it had to turn into a local police force, and NATO is going to be its Super Cop, its senior partner in political terms. The star is the supranational body, in this case NATO or the US army, and the extras are the local armies.

But national armies were built on the basis of a doctrine of «national security.» If there are enemies or dangers to the security of a nation, their work is to maintain security, sometimes against an external enemy, sometimes against destabilizing domestic enemies. This is the doctrine of the Third World War or Cold War. Under these assumptions, national armies develop a national conscious which now makes it difficult to turn them into police friends of the Super Police. Thus the doctrine of national security must now be transformed into «national stability.» The point is no longer defending the nation. Since the main enemy of national stability is drug trafficking, and drug trafficking is international, national armies which operate under the banner of national stability accept international aid or international interference from other countries.

The problem of again reordering national armies exists at the world level. Now we go down to America, and from there to Latin America. The process is a bit similar to that which took place in Europe and which was seen in the Kosovo war with NATO. In the case of Latin America, there is the Organization of American States, the OAS, with the Hemispheric Defense System. According to the former president of Argentina, Menem, all the countries of Latin America are threatened and we need to unite, destroying the national consciences of the armies, and to make a great army under the doctrine of a hemispheric defense system, using the argument of drug trafficking. Given that what is at stake is versatility – or the capacity to make war at any moment, in any place and under any circumstances – rehearsals begin. The few bastions of national defense which still exist must be destroyed by this hemispheric system. If it was Kosovo in Europe, in Latin America it is Colombia and Chiapas. How is this system of hemispheric defense constructed? In two ways. In Colombia, where the threat of drug trafficking is present, the government is asking for everyone’s help: «We have to intervene because drug trafficking not only affects Colombia, but the entire continent.» In the case of Chiapas, the concept of total war is applied. Everyone is a part, there are no neutrals, you are either an ally or you are an enemy.

The New Conquest

In the fragmentation process – turning the entire world into an archipelago – financial power wants to build a new shopping center which will have tourism and natural resources in Chiapas, Belize and Guatemala.

Apart from being full of oil and uranium, the problem is that it is full of indigenous. And the indigenous, in addition to not speaking Spanish, do not want credit cards, they do not produce, they are involved in planting maize, beans, chile, coffee, and they think about dancing to a marimba rather than using a computer. They are neither consumers nor producers. They are superfluous. And everything that is superfluous is expendable. But they do not want to go, and they do not want to stop being indigenous. There is more: their struggle is not to take over power. There struggle is to be recognized as Indian peoples, that their right to exist is recognized, without having to turn into other people.

But the problem is that here, in the land that is at war, in zapatista territory, are the main indigenous cultures, there are the languages and the largest oil deposits. There are the seven Indian peoples who participate in the EZLN, Tzeltal, Tzotzil, Tojolabal, Chol, Zoque, Mam and mestizos. This is the map of Chiapas: communities with an indigenous population and with oil, uranium and precious wood. For neoliberalism everything is merchandise, it is sold, it is exploited. And these indigenous come to say no, that the land is mother, it is the depository of culture, that history lives here, and the dead live here. Absolutely absurd things that cannot be entered on any computer and which are not listed on a stock exchange. And there is no way to convince them to be good, to learn to think right, they simply do not want to. They even rose up in arms. This is why – we say – that the Mexican government does not want to make peace: it is because they want to do away with this enemy and turn this land to desert, afterwards reorganizing it and setting it to operate as a huge shopping center, a Mall in the Mexican Southeast. The EZLN supports the Indian peoples, and is, in this way, an enemy, but not the main one. It is not enough to sort things out with the EZLN, even worse if sorting things out with the EZLN means renouncing this land, because that will mean peace in Chiapas, it will mean renouncing the conquest of a land rich in oil, in precious woods and uranium. This is why they have not done so and are not going to do so.

Published in In Motion Magazine November 11, 2001.

Posted in Μπιλντερμπέργκ, Ξενοφοβία, Ρατσισμός, NWO, Uncategorized | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Σχόλια »

Ο ΧΛΙΔΑΤΟΣ «ΤΑΡΖΑΝ» Η » ΚΑΛΗ ΤΟΥ ΜΟΙΡΑ» ΚΑΙ Η «ΖΟΥΓΚΛΑ» ΤΟΥ ΜΥΑΛΟΥ ΤΟΥ.

Posted by satyrikon στο Μαΐου 22, 2008

Ο «ΡΟΜΠΕΝ ΤΩΝ ΔΑΣΩΝ» ,Ο «ΤΑΡΖΑΝ» Ο «ΦΤΩΧΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΟΝΟΣ ΚΑΟΥ-ΜΠΟΥ»

ΕΙΝΑΙ ΠΡΟΣΩΝΥΜΙΑ ΚΤΗΘΕΝΤΑ ΟΥΧΙ ΕΝ ΤΩ ΣΤΡΑΤΕΥΜΑΤΙ

ΑΛΛΑ ΕΝ ΤΗ ΣΤΡΑΤΕΥΜΕΝΗ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ.
«Ο» ΔΗΜΟΣΙΟΓΡΑΦΟΣ ΛΟΙΠΟΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΤΩΝ ΚΡΥΦΩΝ ΚΑΜΕΡΩΝ ,

ΤΗΣ ΕΝΤΥΠΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑΣ ΕΚΔΟΤΗΣ, ΚΑΙ ΣΥΝΑΝΑΣΤΡΕΦΟΜΕΝΟΣ ΕΚ ΣΠΟΝΤΑΣ

ΤΟΝ «ΚΟΜΙΣΤΗΝ» ΕΖΗΛΩΣΕΝ ΤΗΝ ΔΟΞΑΝ

ΤΗΣ ΗΛΕΚΤΡΟΝΙΚΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑΣ ΠΛΕΟΝ.
ΕΤΟΙΜΑΖΕΙ ΛΟΙΠΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΕΙ ΑΠΟ ΑΥΡΙΟ ,ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΞΥΠΗΡΕΤΗΣΙΝ ΜΑΣ, ΕΙΔΙΚΟ PORTAL ΜΕΣΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΟΠΟΙΟ ΘΑ ΣΥΝΕΧΙΣΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΡΑΓΩΓΗ ΤΟΥ ΣΩΤΗΡΙΟΥ ΕΡΓΟΥ ΤΟΥ ΠΟΥ ΑΠΟΒΛΕΠΕΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΤΟΝΩΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΜΟΝΗΣ ΜΑΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΑ ΑΓΑΘΑ ΤΟΥ ΑΝΑΜΕΝΟΜΕΝΟΥ ΧΡΙΣΤΙΑΝΙΚΟΥ ΠΑΡΑΔΕΙΣΟΥ.
ΜΙΚΡΟΙ ,ΜΕΓΑΛΟΙ ΣΗΚΩΘΗΤΕ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΥΣ ΚΑΝΑΠΕΔΕΣ ΣΑΣ ,

ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΚΡΕΒΒΑΤΙΑ ΣΑΣ , ΝΟΙΚΟΚΥΡΕΣ ΦΥΓΕΤΕ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΝΕΡΟΧΥΤΗ ΣΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΠΕΙΤΕ ΜΑΖΙΚΑ ΣΤΟ ΙΝΤΕΡΝΕΤ ΝΑ ΔΕΙΤΕ «ΤΟ ΕΡΓΟ» ΣΑΣ ΠΟΥ ΘΑ ΠΡΟΒΑΛΛΕΤΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ PORTAL ΤΗΣ ΖΟΥΓΚΛΑΣ.

ΑΝ ΕΙΣΑΣΤΕ ΑΣΧΕΤΟΙ ΦΩΝΑΞΤΕ ΤΑ ΑΝΗΨΙΑ ΣΑΣ, ΤΑ ΕΓΓΟΝΙΑ ΣΑΣ

ΝΑ ΣΑΣ ΒΑΛΟΥΝ ΜΕΣΑ
ΟΣΟΙ ΕΙΣΑΤΕ ΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΕΞΩΤΕΡΙΚΟ ΘΑ ΣΑΣ ΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΕΙ ΜΕ ΠΕΡΙΣΣΗ ΦΡΟΝΤΙΔΑ.
ΜΠΟΡΕΙ ΝΑ ΣΠΟΥΔΑΣΕΤΕ ΚΑΙ ΣΕΙΣ

ΣΑΝ ΤΟΝ ΤΣΕΝΑΥ ΣΤΗΝ ΒΟΣΤΩΝΗ ΤΩΝ ΗΠΑ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΑΠΟΚΤΗΣΕΤΕ ΤΑ ΦΟΝΤΑ ΤΟΥ ΕΠΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΟΥ ΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΗ ΗΓΕΤΗ.
ΟΣΟΙ ΕΙΣΑΣΤΕ ΟΜΟΓΕΝΕΙΣ ΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΕΠΙΣΤΡΕΦΕΤΕ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ,ΑΦΟΥ ΣΤΗΝ ΞΕΝΗΤΕΙΑ ΔΕΝ ΤΑ ΚΑΤΑΦΕΡΑΤΕ,

ΘΑ ΣΑΣ ΚΑΝΕΙ ΕΙΔΙΚΟ ΠΑΡΤΙ ΕΠΙΣΤΡΟΦΗΣ.
ΕΙΔΙΚΑ ΘΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΑΝΑΦΕΡΟΥΜΕ

ΤΟ ΧΛΙΔΑΤΟ ΔΙΑΦΗΜΙΣΤΙΚΟ ΤΡΑΙΗΛΕΡ

ΠΟΥ ΠΡΟΕΒΑΛΕ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΚΠΟΜΠΗ ΤΟΥ.
ΑΥΤΟ ΗΤΑΝ ΑΦΙΕΡΩΜΕΝΟ ΕΙΔΙΚΑ ΣΤΟΥΣ ΧΡΕΩΜΕΝΟΥΣ ΣΤΙΣ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΕΣ, ΣΤΟΥΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΞΙΟΥΧΟΥΣ,

ΣΤΗΝ ΝΕΟΛΑΙΑ ΤΩΝ 350 ΕΥΡΩ ΠΟΥ Ο ΙΔΙΟΣ ΑΝΑΚΑΛΥΨΕ.
ΔΕΙΧΝΕΙ ΤΟΝ ΔΡΟΜΟ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΜΠΟΡΕΣΟΥΝ ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟΙ ΝΑ ΔΟΥΝ ΑΥΤΑ ΠΟΥ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΟΥΝ ΑΠΙΑΣΤΟ ΟΝΕΙΡΟ.
ΑΝ Ο «ΚΟΜΙΣΤΗΣ» ΔΙΑΚΙΝΟΥΣΕ ΜΕΡΙΚΑ ΕΚ. ΕΥΡΩ ΑΥΤΟΣ ΜΑΣ ΔΕΙΧΝΕΙ ΤΙ ΜΠΟΡΕΙ ΝΑ ΚΑΝΕΙ Ο ΚΑΘΕ ΦΤΩΧΟΔΙΑΒΟΛΟΣ ΜΕ ΑΥΤΑ.
ΣΤΗΝ ΤΕΛΕΥΤΑΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΕΚΠΟΜΠΗ ΔΕΝ ΛΕΙΠΕΙ ΚΑΙ Η ΚΑΛΗ ΤΟΥ ΜΟΙΡΑ.
ΛΕΙΠΕΙ Ο ΜΑΡΤΗΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΣΑΡΑΚΟΣΤΗ?
Η ΤΗΛΕΘΕΑΣΗ UBER ALLES!!
Η ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΑ ΔΕΝ ΕΧΕΙ ΑΛΛΑ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ,

ΘΕΛΕΙ ΑΡΤΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΘΕΑΜΑΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΜΟΝΟΜΑΧΟΥΣ ,

ΟΧΙ ΣΤΟΝ ΙΠΠΟΔΡΟΜΟ ΠΙΑ, ΑΛΛΑ ΣΤΑ ΜΜΕ.
Ο ΕΚ-ΑΛΛΙΣΤΟΣ «ΤΑΡΖΑΝ» ΜΕ ΤΑ ΚΑΤΟΡΘΩΜΑΤΑ ΤΟΥ ΜΑΣ ΔΕΙΧΝΕΙ ΤΟ ΔΡΟΜΟ……
ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΑΠΟΒΛΑΚΩΜΕΝΟ ΚΟΙΝΟ ΧΕΙΡΟΚΡΟΤΕΙ!!!
ΚΑΙ Ο ΧΟΡΟΣ ΚΑΛΑ ΚΡΑΤΕΙ….

ΔΕΝ ΤΟΝ ΚΑΤΗΓΟΡΟΥΜΕ ΟΜΩΣ..

ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΞΙΟΣ Ο ΜΙΣΘΟΣ ΤΟΥ…..

ΓΙΑ ΤΟΝ ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΧΝΙΚΟ ΤΡΟΠΟ ΠΟΥ ΠΕΡΝΑΕΙ ΤΑ ΜΗΝΥΜΑΤΑ ΤΗΣ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΟΠΟΙΗΣΗΣ

ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΠΟΒΛΑΚΩΣΗΣ ΣΤΟ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΛΑΟ…

Posted in Αλβανία | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Ο ΑΒΑΝΤΑΔΟΡΙΚΟΣ ΡΟΛΟΣ ΤΗΣ «ΧΡΥΣΗΣ ΑΥΓΗΣ» ΣΤΗΝ ΓΙΓΑΝΤΩΣΗ ΤΟΥ «ΑΝΤΙΦΑΣΙΣΤΙΚΟΥ»,»ΑΝΤΙΡΑΤΣΙΣΤΙΚΟΥ» ΚΙΝΗΜΑΤΟΣ.

Posted by satyrikon στο Φεβρουαρίου 4, 2008

….ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΜΠΑΛΙΝ ΟΠΟΤΕ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΝΑΓΚΑΙΟ. 

Μεγάλη συζήτηση γίνεται για τους φασίστες ,το αυγό του φιδιού, τις επιθέσεις εναντίον μεταναστών και ιδιαίτερα για την γνωστή και μή εξαιρετέα οργάνωση «Χρυσή Αυγή» η οποία δραστηριοποιείται κάθε τόσο χρησιμοποιώντας σωβινιστικά συνθήματα και -όπως καταγγέλουν-βίαιες πράξεις.

Χωρίς να παριστάνουμε τους σοφούς χρησιμοποιώντας την απλή λογική θα θέσουμε υπόψη σας την συνταγή-οχι βέβαια της Ντόρας-που χρησιμοποιείται γενικά για την γιγάντωση του όψιμου και επιδοτούμενου «αντιφασιστικού»,»αντιρατσιστικού» κινήματος.

Η συνταγή είναι η εξής:

Ιδρύουμε μία φασιστική,ακροδεξιά,ρατσιστική -και ότι άλλο επίθετο θέλετε βάλτε -οργάνωση που αποστολή έχει την στρατολόγηση «ακραιφνών Ελλήνων» και την τοποθέτηση παρωπίδων σε αυτούς.

Απο την άλλη μεριά -επειδή θέλουμε να προωθήσουμε το λεγόμενο «αντιφασιστικό»»αντιρατσιστικό»-εδω βάλτε αντι+οτι επίθετο είναι εναντίον του έθνους-ιδρύουμε ΜΚΟ με τέτοιο χαράκτήρα.

Αυτά όπως καταλαβαίνετε τα βάζουμε σε δυό διαφορετικές κατσαρόλες.

Προσθέτουμε σε κάθε μίγμα και μιά πρέζα κρατικής παρέμβασης-άμεσης η έμμεσης-και ανακατεύουμε μέχρι να έρθει η ώρα δράσης.

Θέλουμε τώρα να αρχίσει να βράζει η κατσαρόλα με το αντιρατσιστικό ,αντιφασιστικό μέιγμα?

Βάζουμε σε δράση τους ρατσιστές,φασίστες κλπ-να δείρουν ένα μετανάστη,η να κάνουν μια συγκέντρωση που θα εξελιχθεί σε επεισόδεια.

Αμέσως έχουμε την άμεση αντίδραση των «αντιφα-πάσης αποχρώσεως.

Ετσι λοιπόν η δράση των εθνικιστών αλείφει με βούτυρο το ψωμάκι των αντιφα-πάσης μορφής.

ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΑΝΤΙΣΤΡΟΦΟ.

 Με δυό κουβέντες: βάζω κάποιον να μέ δείρει γιά να έχω το δίκαιο «δικαίωμα» της αντίδρασης και διαμαρτυρίας.

Κάθε φορά λοιπόν που θέλω να μεταστρέψω το ενδιαφέρον της κοινής γνώμης απο τα βιοτικά της συμφέροντα δημιουργώ γεγονότα και δίνω τροφή στα ΜΜΕ για να δημιουργήσουν την εικονική πραγματικότητα.

 

Posted in ΜΚΟ | Με ετικέτα: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Σχόλια »

 
Αρέσει σε %d bloggers: